Jump to content

Trump criminal case: Full 12-person jury seated in Manhattan


Social Media

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TorquayFan said:

Ric - with all respect - Democracy has a meaning in it's own right.

 

Irrespective of Political Parties, the USA has a Constitution AND Laws - under which, for offences against, Trump has been caught out by acts he made and the events he created.

 

Trump recognises no higher Authority than himself and will as a result of his hubris, fail in his endeavours. Which WILL be for the greater benefit of the USA and the World. IMHO !

 

I wanted to reply to points in your posts l but could find only blind stuff. If you think this is some kind of conspiracy or plot, lets see how it goes in this NY trial, Florida, Georgia and Washington DC. And the 'Class Action' about 'Truth Social".

 

Future happenings there will be based in FACTS and LAW.

 

GN

With all respect, perverted facts & law!

 McCarthy, Turley Barr , experts in law proclaimed , its all politics .

People like you would rather see him

Be stripped of a mouth for daring to call it like it is ! 

What country did you say you’re from?

Edited by riclag
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He paid stormy to keep quiet and then misreported the payment as legal fees to hide it. 

 

Meanwhile in New York, the same AG is releasing criminal illegal aliens that have been arrested for illegals drug and gun charges on their own recognizance.    

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again you misrepresent the facts of the case.

 

Refer the indictment handed down by the Grand Jury.

That's what I was referring too, did you not know that? 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yellowtail said:

That's what I was referring too, did you not know that? 

You clearly were not.

 

Because each of the 34 indictments are felonies, not misdemeanors.

 

Its not the fraud, it’s the fraud pursuant of another crime - Felony!

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again you misrepresent the facts of the case.

 

Refer the indictment handed down by the Grand Jury.

"Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursement payments to former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for the money paid to adult film actress Stormy Daniels." 

 

Is this not exactly how I have been representing the facts? Your nose is growing...

Donald Trump-Stormy Daniels alleged relationship timeline of events (usatoday.com)

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You clearly were not.

 

Because each of the 34 indictments are felonies, not misdemeanors.

 

Its not the fraud, it’s the fraud pursuant of another crime - Felony!

Right, the other "crime" being complain finance violations. The state says the payment should have been listed as a campaign expense.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Right, the other "crime" being complain finance violations. The state says the payment should have been listed as a campaign expense.

 

 

The other crime being election interference.

 

Stay tuned.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The other crime being election interference.

 

Stay tuned.

How? Nothing about paying to keep people quiet here:

"No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President..."

Civil Rights Division | Title 52- Voting and Elections- Subtitle I and II (justice.gov

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, riclag said:

“If you believe Donald Trump should get no special treatment from the law because he’s a former president, that he should be treated like any other American accused of a crime, ask yourself this:

Would you, as an ordinary American, ever face a prosecutor who rose to power vowing to get you”?

 

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/philboas/2023/03/31/trump-indictment-alvin-bragg-act-political-aggression/70068894007/

 

This is the rub ! You see the far left has taken over the cities justice system!

Dem judge ( this and LetishaJames

Dem prosecutors ( this and LethisaJames)

87 % of the voters are dem!

 

No fair trial , its Dem justice!

Its perverted and never can be  Accepted ( if found guilty)by real  Americans who treasure the 

values of the republic founding.

It sounds like you are about to set yourself on fire.

 

Seriously, Trump allegedly committed crimes, and is now on trial. Why are you so worked up over it?

 

There is no end of people who were unjustly prosecuted, why aren't you posting about them? Do you know about the Central Park Five?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How? Nothing about paying to keep people quiet here:

"No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President..."

Civil Rights Division | Title 52- Voting and Elections- Subtitle I and II (justice.gov

Don't worry, the Prosecution will lay out the case soon.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidence is not Evidence until it is admitted in Court. One only has to look at the Georgia case where the Raffensperger 'find me 11K votes' phone call was the impetus for the whole investigation and indictment. Recording and transcript readily available.

 

Tossed by Judge McAfee on an indictment wording technicality.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-throws-6-counts-trumps-georgia-election-interference/story?id=108079326

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...