Hi Folks,

 

Some of you may be old enough to recall Jane visiting North Vietnam.

Kamala strikes me as someone cut from the same cloth as Fonda, only better.

 

There are those who are not able to see the goodness in Jane, or in Kamala, but I am not one who is so blind.

 

So, the Question Is:

 

If, this November, there were only two candidates running, and if Jane was running to be the next Republican president, which I must say, she would have to be, considering the politics of Kamala, then which honey would garner your vote?

 

I do not mind telling you that I am a Fonda Fan, and she would get my vote, just as she always has had my unwavering support.

 

What about you?

Which girl is for you?

Or, would you prefer both, at once...

One for Prez, and one for V-Prez, and why.

 

What is it about these pair that causes such utter fascination among the voting public?

 

Just in case you forget which is which, here are two images I found.

And, once again, Kamala is no match for Jane, as we can plainly see.

 

 

 

You Jane,
Me, Kamala....

 

Best regards,

Gamma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 22, 20241 yr by GammaGlobulin

Gamma for PREZ !

1 minute ago, save the frogs said:

Gamma for PREZ !

 

Only if I could have Jane for my running mate.

 

Take a tip from former PREZ, Gamma.

 

If you ever get lost, all you need is a little faith and a Magical Pistachio to guide you to safety. 

 

 

Camel Toe or bust!

fake bikini pic.

Angel Reese

 

 

Both LOSERS!

 

Two of the most expensive hookers in America.

Edited July 22, 20241 yr by G_Money

9 hours ago, G_Money said:

Both LOSERS!

 

Two of the most expensive hookers in America.

Just ask Ted Turner and Willie Brown.

Edited July 23, 20241 yr by G_Money

17 hours ago, G_Money said:

Just ask Ted Turner and Willie Brown.

 

Voting for Kamala is completely impossible.

 

Therefore, if both were running, then it would be a landslide for Jane.

 

Any vote for Kamala is absolutely unthinkable.

 

Even Ted Bundy for Prez is more acceptable.

 

 

19 hours ago, G_Money said:

Just ask Ted Turner and Willie Brown.

And don't forget Kamala was Montel Williams' side chick for a brief while back in 2001

It definitely should be Lisa Simpson!

 

On 7/22/2024 at 10:14 PM, GammaGlobulin said:

Hi Folks,

 

Some of you may be old enough to recall Jane visiting North Vietnam.

Kamala strikes me as someone cut from the same cloth as Fonda, only better.

 

There are those who are not able to see the goodness in Jane, or in Kamala, but I am not one who is so blind.

 

So, the Question Is:

 

If, this November, there were only two candidates running, and if Jane was running to be the next Republican president, which I must say, she would have to be, considering the politics of Kamala, then which honey would garner your vote?

 

I do not mind telling you that I am a Fonda Fan, and she would get my vote, just as she always has had my unwavering support.

 

What about you?

Which girl is for you?

Or, would you prefer both, at once...

One for Prez, and one for V-Prez, and why.

 

What is it about these pair that causes such utter fascination among the voting public?

 

Just in case you forget which is which, here are two images I found.

And, once again, Kamala is no match for Jane, as we can plainly see.

 

 

 

You Jane,
Me, Kamala....

 

Best regards,

Gamma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guess you also forgot her nickname, Hanoi Jane, and why she got it. Kamala is a proven entity and would be a good president, and her being elected would get Trump and his disturbed thinking out for good.

3 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Voting for Kamala is completely impossible.

 

Therefore, if both were running, then it would be a landslide for Jane.

 

Any vote for Kamala is absolutely unthinkable.

 

Even Ted Bundy for Prez is more acceptable.

 

 

Kamala is a unique opportunity for racists and misogynists to present a united front.

 

Will you be voting for Trump, or abstaining?

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

Kamala is a unique opportunity for racists and misogynists to present a united front.

 

Will you be voting for Trump, or abstaining?

Race card already 

What about the woman card? 

5 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Guess you also forgot her nickname, Hanoi Jane, and why she got it. Kamala is a proven entity and would be a good president, and her being elected would get Trump and his disturbed thinking out for good.

 

And, let's not forget calamity Jane.

 

And, for that matter...

 

Kalamity Kamala.

 

I would NEVER vote for that nitwit.

Poorly educated.

Not of my culture, either.

Send her back to India, with that former PM, what's-his-face.

 

If I want Indian Kulture, then I will just book a flight to Kalcutta.

 

Oh, Kalcutta!

 

5 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Kamala is a unique opportunity for racists and misogynists to present a united front.

 

Will you be voting for Trump, or abstaining?

 

I never vote in the USA elections.

There is no percentage in it for me.

 

Why should I vote for anybody in the US?

I am never there.

Have not been there since 1979.

Do not plan to be there, in the future.

 

And, where should I register to vote, anyway?

 

Maybe I could register to vote in Vermont, and vote for Bernie, I suppose....

But, I prefer the state of Maine, it being on the coast.

 

Speaking of Vermont...

 

I miss the culture of America....

Seven decades ago, and before.

 

She's even better in this rendition....:!

 

Edited July 24, 20241 yr by GammaGlobulin

3 hours ago, susanlea said:

What about the woman card? 

 

You always take the woman's point of view, it seems....

 

34 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

And, let's not forget calamity Jane.

 

And, for that matter...

 

Kalamity Kamala.

 

I would NEVER vote for that nitwit.

Poorly educated.

Not of my culture, either.

Send her back to India, with that former PM, what's-his-face.

 

If I want Indian Kulture, then I will just book a flight to Kalcutta.

 

Oh, Kalcutta!

 

Kamala Harris was born in California. If you don't want to vote, or don't vote, why bother posting topics involving voting? She has a bachelors from Stanford and a J.D. from Howard, so she's hardly poorly educated. I'm not a political person, seeing things as they are from the outside, but she seems to have the stuff to be a decent president, and anyone not blind sees trump for what he is.

Edited July 24, 20241 yr by fredwiggy

21 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

I never vote in the USA elections.

There is no percentage in it for me.

 

Why should I vote for anybody in the US?

I am never there.

Have not been there since 1979.

Do not plan to be there, in the future.

 

And, where should I register to vote, anyway?

 

Maybe I could register to vote in Vermont, and vote for Bernie, I suppose....

But, I prefer the state of Maine, it being on the coast.

 

Speaking of Vermont...

 

I miss the culture of America....

Seven decades ago, and before.

 

She's even better in this rendition....:!

 

You can fill out an FPCA, send it in, and receive your ballot in the mail, but again, you said you don't vote so it's moot point. If you miss the "cultures" of America, meaning it's a combination of many, move back,as I will.

4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Kamala Harris was born in California. If you don't want to vote, or don't vote, why bother posting topics involving voting? She has a bachelors from Stanford and a J.D. from Harvard, so she's hardly poorly educated. I'm not a political person, seeing things as they are from the outside, but she seems to have the stuff to be a decent president, and anyone not blind sees trump for what he is.

 

WHAT ARE you TALKING ABOUT?

 

Check again.

NOT Harvard!

 

She graduated from HOWARD university.

I already pointed out that her SAT scores were probably super low, compared to students able to enter Harvard for a BA degree.

 

Howard is an ALL BLACK school.

 

NO COMPARISON!

 

 

 

So, please STOP with the dreaming and misinformation.

Tks.!

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You can fill out an FPCA, send it in, and receive your ballot in the mail, but again, you said you don't vote so it's moot point. If you miss the "cultures" of America, meaning it's a combination of many, move back,as I will.

 

What.

 

You gonna move BACK IN TIME?

 

How?

 

The American "culture" that I miss NO LONGER exists!

 

Let's be clear, here....OK?

 

 

Just now, GammaGlobulin said:

 

WHAT ARE you TALKING ABOUT?

 

Check again.

NOT Harvard!

 

She graduated from HOWARD university.

I already pointed out that her SAT scores were probably super low, compared to students able to enter Harvard for a BA degree.

 

Howard is an ALL BLACK school.

 

NO COMPARISON!

 

 

 

So, please STOP with the dreaming and misinformation.

Tks.!

 

 

 

 

That was a mistake I corrected. I knew it was started with a H. You can't point out guessing at anyone's scores, as you don't know them. In any event, she graduated. Doesn't matter if you're a valedictorian or had all B's. Being the president doesn't require much in the way of high intelligence, as has been proven, especially the last one.

1 minute ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

What.

 

You gonna move BACK IN TIME?

 

How?

 

The American "culture" that I miss NO LONGER exists!

 

Let's be clear, here....OK?

 

 

You're the one making statements based on opinions and videos, not actually being there. I was there from 1956 to 6 years ago, and have visited, plus have many friends and family still there. It's still the same besides the larger population and growth from it. If you lived in the country of Vermont or anywhere else small town , and didn't wander much past that, then you're still stuck in that mentality, as all who still live in small town USA are. I lived in big cities, just outside them, and in the country, and it's still much the same besides that urban sprawl. Can't guess if you haven't been there for decades.

I'll let you in on a secret... a Willie will be coming out of the closet soon

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You're the one making statements based on opinions and videos, not actually being there. I was there from 1956 to 6 years ago, and have visited, plus have many friends and family still there. It's still the same besides the larger population and growth from it. If you lived in the country of Vermont or anywhere else small town , and didn't wander much past that, then you're still stuck in that mentality, as all who still live in small town USA are. I lived in big cities, just outside them, and in the country, and it's still much the same besides that urban sprawl. Can't guess if you haven't been there for decades.

 

I am not "STUCK".

 

The US is NOT the same now, as it was during the period I am referring to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is plenty of land in Mexico.

 

Mexican Land for the Mexicans!

I say.

 

I prefer homogeneous cultures.

I will never leave Asia.

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

I am not "STUCK".

 

The US is NOT the same now, as it was during the period I am referring to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is plenty of land in Mexico.

 

Mexican Land for the Mexicans!

I say.

 

I prefer homogeneous cultures.

I will never leave Asia.

 

 

 

 

Showing your prejudice there GG. I lived 32 years next to San Antonio, and had many friends and acquaintances that are Mexican. Like the food, music is okay, and they're mostly Christians like myself. Never a problem with them at all. A mixture of cultures is what makes America great. More to choose from. Asia has millions of other foreigners living in all Asian countries, so you're out of luck looking for an area with just Asians, unless you hide in the country. And again, you haven't been to the US, living there, for decades, so you can't comment on it. It's still much the same besides like I said, more people.

Edited July 24, 20241 yr by fredwiggy

23 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

That was a mistake I corrected. I knew it was started with a H.

 

At least we can agree on this.

 

But, on almost everything else, it seems....

Fundamentally, we disagree.

 

Just now, GammaGlobulin said:

 

At least we can agree on this.

 

But, on almost everything else, it seems....

Fundamentally, we disagree.

 

Yes, I go by facts, and you make guesses based on others opinions.