Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigns after Trump shooting security lapses

[CharlieH]

 

Kimberly Cheatle resigned from her position as director of the U.S. Secret Service after facing pressure from lawmakers who called for her to step down in the wake of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.

Cheatle announced her plans to leave her position in a letter to agency staff on Tuesday.

"As I've stated, the Secret Service will move forward with our investigatory and protective mission in a steadfast manner. We do not retreat from challenge. However, I do not want my calls for resignation to be a distraction from the great work each and every one of you do towards our vital mission," Cheatle said. "In light of recent events, it is with a heavy heart that, I have made the difficult decision to step down as your Director."

 

As reported in mainstream media.

 

2024-07-24

 

 

[JonnyF]

Great news. 

 

Now maybe the secret service can return to hiring the most suitable people for the job instead of pandering to some flawed DEI agenda.

 

Let's hope such incredible levels of incompetency are never seen again. 

[mikeymike100]

Well, after the utter incompetence shown by her staff, and she did say..'the buck stops here', plus the grilling she had in the 'house' she really had no choice.

[john donson]

sometimes you need the right person, not some diversity bull

[thaipo7]

11 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

Well, after the utter incompetence shown by her staff, and she did say..'the buck stops here', plus the grilling she had in the 'house' she really had no choice.

Had to make sure the First Lady was the most protected, who we have all the looneys out there who want to kill Trump.  Then we have Iran wanting to assassinate him too.  Personally I don't know how Trump has made it this long.  He is not protected enough.

[thaipo7]

The Great Prosecutor against the Convicted Felon

 

Soros Prosecutor Bragg and Biden's acting state judge Merchan gave the Democrat Party what they wanted to run on.  The media is fine with this but much of America is not.  Kamala Harris gets the nomination without a challenge. If they held a real Democrat nomination process, she would not be the nominee.  The media wants Harris because they like the Biden Harris policies.  They want Harris because they want the extreme Marxist, Islamic agenda.  She has made it very clear that she stands with the River to the Sea crowd.  She made it clear she would not meet with Netanyahu.  She is a radical and this is why she can get the nomination.  The media that lied to you about Russian collusion, Hunter's laptop, and Biden's sharpness, are lying to you again.    

 

The NYT has the story that they wanted years ago against President Trump.  It is the Great Prosecutor and the Convicted Felon.  First the felon is appealing his conviction.  It will probably be overturned but not before the election which is all the media wanted for this election.  Second, what is the true history of this Great Prosecutor?  It seems that it is not so great.

 

Mark Levin went on the Internet to see how many cases and appellate cases Harris has tried herself.  CNN does not have an answer.  MSNBC does not have an answer.  The NYT and the Washington Post don't have an answer.  CBS, NBC or ABC don't have an answer.  We are waiting for the Harris campaign to give us an answer.  We were told that she was a tough Prosecutor or maybe not.  Just want to know what did she personally prosecute.  What were the cases?  Maybe someone would like to look at them.  We all know how tough on crime San Francisco is.  So what cases?  

 

What we do know is that cases prosecuted by her were a disaster.  5 times, Prosecutor Harris, got the wrong guy and she did not give a damn.  Alana Goodman of the Washington Examiner.  This is from a few years back stating Kamala Harris has been receiving criticism from fellow Democrats when she was a top prosecutor.  During last month's Democratic debate Harris was slammed for blocking DNA testing that could have exonerated Edwin Cooper on death row. The murder took place in 1983.  This was not the only case like this.  There are 5 other cases where Harris fought against prison reform.  

 

In 2010, Reality Star Jamal Truelove, was convicted of murdering a 28 year old woman based on only one witness.  He received 50 years and Harris praised the lone witness but failed to mention that the witness was paid $60,000 by the Prosecution and given new housing under the Witness Protection Program.  An appeals court overturned the conviction after finding out prosecutors working under Harris the DA had mischaracterized the witness to the jury.  Truelove received a $13 million settlement from the city.  This was not mentioned by the media today.  There are 4 others like this I am not going to write about.  You get the idea.  

 

But today in the NYT we have the story that she is a tough Prosecutor against a convicted felon.  See how phony this is?  First, Trump is appealing the case.  The whole case was a Stalinist farce by the Democrat Party.  They do this for her and then name her this fierce prosecutor.   The media should investigate this but they won't.   

 

This is not too old.  Kalama Harris backed the Freedom Fund that put murderers and rapists back on the streets is still up and running.  This started back in 2020 and is still taking donations.  Back in 2020 when BLM was rioting in the streets of MN, $41 million was donated with a fraction actually being used to free the rioters.  Oh, she is a tough Prosecutor.  Soros who backs these soft prosecutors says lets all get behind Harris.  What does he know that we don't?

 

Now she has the whole Democrat machine including the Democrat media as one machine trying to get her elected.    

[candide]

47 minutes ago, thaipo7 said:

The Great Prosecutor against the Convicted Felon

 

Soros Prosecutor Bragg and Biden's acting state judge Merchan gave the Democrat Party what they wanted to run on.  The media is fine with this but much of America is not.  Kamala Harris gets the nomination without a challenge. If they held a real Democrat nomination process, she would not be the nominee.  The media wants Harris because they like the Biden Harris policies.  They want Harris because they want the extreme Marxist, Islamic agenda.  She has made it very clear that she stands with the River to the Sea crowd.  She made it clear she would not meet with Netanyahu.  She is a radical and this is why she can get the nomination.  The media that lied to you about Russian collusion, Hunter's laptop, and Biden's sharpness, are lying to you again.    

 

The NYT has the story that they wanted years ago against President Trump.  It is the Great Prosecutor and the Convicted Felon.  First the felon is appealing his conviction.  It will probably be overturned but not before the election which is all the media wanted for this election.  Second, what is the true history of this Great Prosecutor?  It seems that it is not so great.

 

Mark Levin went on the Internet to see how many cases and appellate cases Harris has tried herself.  CNN does not have an answer.  MSNBC does not have an answer.  The NYT and the Washington Post don't have an answer.  CBS, NBC or ABC don't have an answer.  We are waiting for the Harris campaign to give us an answer.  We were told that she was a tough Prosecutor or maybe not.  Just want to know what did she personally prosecute.  What were the cases?  Maybe someone would like to look at them.  We all know how tough on crime San Francisco is.  So what cases?  

 

What we do know is that cases prosecuted by her were a disaster.  5 times, Prosecutor Harris, got the wrong guy and she did not give a damn.  Alana Goodman of the Washington Examiner.  This is from a few years back stating Kamala Harris has been receiving criticism from fellow Democrats when she was a top prosecutor.  During last month's Democratic debate Harris was slammed for blocking DNA testing that could have exonerated Edwin Cooper on death row. The murder took place in 1983.  This was not the only case like this.  There are 5 other cases where Harris fought against prison reform.  

 

In 2010, Reality Star Jamal Truelove, was convicted of murdering a 28 year old woman based on only one witness.  He received 50 years and Harris praised the lone witness but failed to mention that the witness was paid $60,000 by the Prosecution and given new housing under the Witness Protection Program.  An appeals court overturned the conviction after finding out prosecutors working under Harris the DA had mischaracterized the witness to the jury.  Truelove received a $13 million settlement from the city.  This was not mentioned by the media today.  There are 4 others like this I am not going to write about.  You get the idea.  

 

But today in the NYT we have the story that she is a tough Prosecutor against a convicted felon.  See how phony this is?  First, Trump is appealing the case.  The whole case was a Stalinist farce by the Democrat Party.  They do this for her and then name her this fierce prosecutor.   The media should investigate this but they won't.   

 

This is not too old.  Kalama Harris backed the Freedom Fund that put murderers and rapists back on the streets is still up and running.  This started back in 2020 and is still taking donations.  Back in 2020 when BLM was rioting in the streets of MN, $41 million was donated with a fraction actually being used to free the rioters.  Oh, she is a tough Prosecutor.  Soros who backs these soft prosecutors says lets all get behind Harris.  What does he know that we don't?

 

Now she has the whole Democrat machine including the Democrat media as one machine trying to get her elected.    

You guys always have a conspiracy theory about any issue! 😀

[JCauto]

On 7/24/2024 at 8:20 AM, JonnyF said:

Great news. 

 

Now maybe the secret service can return to hiring the most suitable people for the job instead of pandering to some flawed DEI agenda.

 

Let's hope such incredible levels of incompetency are never seen again. 

 

Can you provide a reference source that she was a DEI hire? I believe that this is a stated fact so requires backup evidence according to my interlocutors from the Right.

[JonnyF]

18 hours ago, JCauto said:

 

Can you provide a reference source that she was a DEI hire? I believe that this is a stated fact so requires backup evidence according to my interlocutors from the Right.

 

Already provided. Please check my previous posts.

[JCauto]

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Already provided. Please check my previous posts.

 

Just looked through this thread - it's not here. A link to another post would work.