Turns out he was reported to "Prevent" 3 times before he did the murder.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/world/europe/trial-southport-stabbings-uk-axel-rudakubana.html

 

I guess the police were too busy with other things like policing social media for hurty tweets. 

 

15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Nice puff piece in there with the obligatory "first day at school" picture. 😄

 

"Puff piece"?  Did you read the article??  It details all of his violent past, all the details of his attacks on teachers and pupils, his obsession with violence. 

Yet Jonny screen grabs something from the bottom of the article which details his childhood, and you picked two sentences that are followed by stories of his neighbours telling how police were regular visitors and how he went about the killings.

You can't be taken seriously anymore (not that you ever could).

Post the entire article. Here, I can do it for you. Maybe other people actually read things:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqx949jzjlyo

The full facts will hopefully be known in time, as the government have ordered a Public Inquiry into the attack and the circumstances around it.

Not looking good for Starmer now he no longer silence everyone on the basis of "prejudicing the trial".

 

Another cover up it would seem.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/01/20/keir-starmer-police-covered-up-southport-terror-farage/

 

7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Not looking good for Starmer now he no longer silence everyone on the basis of "prejudicing the trial".

 

Another cover up it would seem.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/01/20/keir-starmer-police-covered-up-southport-terror-farage/

 

How’s that not looking good for Starmer?

 

9 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Not looking good for Starmer now he no longer silence everyone on the basis of "prejudicing the trial".

 

Another cover up it would seem.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/01/20/keir-starmer-police-covered-up-southport-terror-farage/

 

How can there be a cover-up if there's going to be a full Public Inquiry?

1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

How can there be a cover-up if there's going to be a full Public Inquiry?

You're looking at this from in the real world, you have to imagine what it's like in Jonny's head. In that maelstrom of paranoia I am sure it makes sense.

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How’s that not looking good for Starmer?

 

 

Because it will be revealed what the government knew and when they knew it.

 

Us Brits do not like being lied to by our so called leaders. 

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Because it will be revealed what the government knew and when they knew it.

 

Us Brits do not like being lied to by our so called leaders. 

Once again you display that ability to predict the outcome of an inquiry that has not taken place.

 

As for not liking being lied to… ‘warm sunlit uplands’.

 

13 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

How can there be a cover-up if there's going to be a full Public Inquiry?

 

Same way as the rape gangs were. 

 

It generally involves some talking head being put in charge of the inquiry, who looks in the wrong place, finds little wrongdoing and then surprisingly gets a cushy promotion. 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again you display that ability to predict the outcome of an inquiry that has not taken place.

 

I've displayed my ability to predict a lot of things.

 

The Brexit result, the Trump win being two of the more notable ones. 

12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Because it will be revealed what the government knew and when they knew it.

 

Us Brits do not like being lied to by our so called leaders. 

£350m a week to the NHS?

Taking back control of the borders?

Massive trade deals?

Cheaper food?

21 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I've displayed my ability to predict a lot of things.

 

The Brexit result, the Trump win being two of the more notable ones. 

Predicting binary events is a 50:50 chance of being correct.

 

Predicting findings of an inquiry not so.

 

All you’ve done is display your bias.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Predicting binary events is a 50:50 chance of being correct.

 

Best you stay away from betting on sports. 😄

40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Same way as the rape gangs were. 

 

It generally involves some talking head being put in charge of the inquiry, who looks in the wrong place, finds little wrongdoing and then surprisingly gets a cushy promotion. 

So you were against a new, full public inquiry being set up for the 'grooming/rape gangs'?  I'm confused!

2 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

So you were against a new, full public inquiry being set up for the 'grooming/rape gangs'?  I'm confused!

 

Yes you seem quite confused. 

 

You asked how there could be a cover up, so I explained it to you. 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes you seem quite confused. 

 

You asked how there could be a cover up, so I explained it to you. 

Thanks.  Maybe I was confusing you with @Bkk Brian who was furious with Labour for not setting up a new Public Inquiry.

1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Thanks.  Maybe I was confusing you with @Bkk Brian who was furious with Labour for not setting up a new Public Inquiry.

I would respond on that topic if it was not off topic @brewsterbudgen

Update:

 

Southport Killer Sentenced to Minimum of 52 Years for 'Pure Evil' Murders