Opinion: Harm to Science of Promoting the Covid Lab Leak Hypothesis

[blaze master]

1 minute ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." -Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

 

Biden is super duper mentally fit and 51 agents say the laptop is so nof real.

 

What's your point.

[NoDisplayName]

33 minutes ago, rabas said:

but the confidence level was low

 

GIGO

[johng]

For what it's worth.

[johng]

Ohh dear !!! yet more crumbling of the narrative.

 

New York Times

"We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives"

 

when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China.

 

Read the full article here

https://archive.ph/dVWFI

 

 

[Red Phoenix]

4 hours ago, johng said:

Ohh dear !!! yet more crumbling of the narrative.

 

New York Times

"We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives"

 

when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China.

 

Read the full article here

https://archive.ph/dVWFI

 

What about the 3rd hypothesis that gets 'no airplay' at all and is ridiculed with no actual evidence to dismiss it, i.e. that there was no sickness-creating virus.  Note that this does not mean that people did not get sick from 'something'.  It simply means that we should question the actual existence of any sickness-causing virus. Toxins can make you sick, and the debris of dead cells can be (willfully) mistaken for a virus. 

But strange as it may seem for anyone bombarded and indoctrinated by the theory that 'invisible' germs are causing people to get sick, a living virus has NEVER been isolated.  The whole field of 'virology' is nothing more than pseudo-science and a sick joke (pun intended).   

[Stiddle Mump]

4 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

What about the 3rd hypothesis that gets 'no airplay' at all and is ridiculed with no actual evidence to dismiss it, i.e. that there was no sickness-creating virus.  Note that this does not mean that people did not get sick from 'something'.  It simply means that we should question the actual existence of any sickness-causing virus. Toxins can make you sick, and the debris of dead cells can be (willfully) mistaken for a virus. 

But strange as it may seem for anyone bombarded and indoctrinated by the theory that 'invisible' germs are causing people to get sick, a living virus has NEVER been isolated.  The whole field of 'virology' is nothing more than pseudo-science and a sick joke (pun intended).   

Well said Red.

 

I dispute that the 'virus' - as in covid - only became apparent to all professionals in 2020. It was on the table in the last quarter of 2019. a couple of pointers:

 

The Times of Israel had a front page splash in November of 2019 saying that a pandemic was on its way.

 

Bill Gates said (on the record) that Moderna was going to be big the following year. Moderna had tried to get their mRNA stuff through the US regulatory authorities; but failed. Only a pandemic, where there was no other relief or cure, would see the jabs authorised (under emergency use). Droxy and Iver anyone? Even vitamins were demonised.

 

Moderna had a 300 page patent ready to go on 2019. 

 

IMO, it was all planned, and orchestrated, by a handful of evil people. They in turn enlisted people in key positions, and the other white-coats followed like sheep.

 

Lab leak and wet market and bats? All utter drivel for the dumbsters to keep believing in a mystical virus. As Red says; one that has never been shown to exist by isolation.

[johng]

4 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

What about the 3rd hypothesis that gets 'no airplay' at all and is ridiculed with no actual evidence to dismiss it, i.e. that there was no sickness-creating virus

 

At this point I can't rule anything out  given the lies,deceit and  propaganda of the

last few years..they really did shoot themself in the foot this time, a large portion of the population will never believe a word they say ever again.

[Stiddle Mump]

2 minutes ago, johng said:

 

At this point I can't rule anything out  given the lies,deceit and  propaganda of the

last few years..they really did shoot themself in the foot this time, a large portion of the population will never believe a word they say ever again.

Quite a few will not be alive to believe them either.

 

Dr D Cahill reckons that anyone who had a 'hot' jab will have serious reactions within 5 years.