Kamala Harris supports the Radical Trans and Homosexual Agenda

[Yagoda]

Just now, Yellowtail said:

How is Project 2025 radically anti LGBT? 

Because he said so.

[cjinchiangrai]

31 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Because he said so.

Deliberate ignorance does not reinforce your position.

[Yagoda]

2 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Deliberate ignorance does not reinforce your position.

You havent read it either.

 

You seem sort of personally offended by this topic.

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

You havent read it either.

 

You seem sort of personally offended by this topic.

Most people in Thailand would be offended. Is is full of deliberately misleading and offensive content. Trans people have done nothing to you and yet you claim entitlement to discriminate against them.

[Yellowtail]

6 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Deliberate ignorance does not reinforce your position.

How is Project 2025 radically anti LGBT? 

[Yagoda]

38 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Most people in Thailand would be offended. Is is full of deliberately misleading and offensive content. Trans people have done nothing to you and yet you claim entitlement to discriminate against them.

It doesnt concern people in Thailand, but US society. And there is no discrimination in opposing non consensual genital mutilation is there?

 

 

[bubblegum]

There is no radical transgender homosexual agenda. You're just scared of the booky man under your bed. Or in your "closet"?

 

 

[cjinchiangrai]

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

It doesnt concern people in Thailand, but US society. And there is no discrimination in opposing non consensual genital mutilation is there?

 

 

There is no SRT or HRT available for minors. It is propaganda pushing a right wing narrative that does not exist.

[Yagoda]

Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

There is no SRT or HRT available for minors. It is propaganda pushing a right wing narrative that does not exist.

I dont understand what those acronyms are, seems you are familiar with them tho. Did you fail to read the links earlier?

 

You are an adult so no one cares if you want to "transition", but why should you be permitted to waggle your willy in a girls restroom?

[Yagoda]

7 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

There is no radical transgender homosexual agenda. You're just scared of the booky man under your bed. Or in your "closet"?

 

 

Its a "boogyman". 

And what does my assumed sexuality have to do with the argument?

 

 

[cjinchiangrai]

11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I dont understand what those acronyms are, seems you are familiar with them tho. Did you fail to read the links earlier?

 

You are an adult so no one cares if you want to "transition", but why should you be permitted to waggle your willy in a girls restroom?

So you are not working from further ignorance: SRT=Sexual Reassignment Therapy, HRT=Hormone Replacement Therapy. Anyone knowledgeable about transitioning would know this.

Edited September 6 by cjinchiangrai
spelling

[Lacessit]

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I dont understand what those acronyms are, seems you are familiar with them tho. Did you fail to read the links earlier?

 

You are an adult so no one cares if you want to "transition", but why should you be permitted to waggle your willy in a girls restroom?

AFAIK women's restroom do not have male urinals where one can waggle their willy.

 

Women have cubicles. They have to pee sitting down. Willy waggling would occur in the privacy of a cubicle.

 

Perhaps these biological differences between men and women escaped you, leading a sheltered life.

[Yagoda]

9 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

So you are nor working from further ignorance: SRT=Sexual Reassignment Therapy, HRT=Hormone Replacement Therapy. Anyone knowledgeable about transitioning would know this.

You mean genital mutilation and chemical castration?

 

Im sure you are knowledgeable about transitioning. 

Edited September 6 by Yagoda

[cjinchiangrai]

12 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You mean genital mutilation and chemical castration?

 

Im sure you are knowledgeable about transitioning. 

Not exactly, but close. Note that the last word in each is therapy. This designates medically supervised procedures performed in the interest of the patient.

 

Genital mutilation is reserved for minority women and the unfortunate accident when they slipped during your circumcision.

[proton]

I would be more concerned about her giving away $25k dollars for people to put a deposit on a house. It's easy to give away other peoples money, that's the problem with socialism, eventually you run out of other people's money- and have to start taxing them more.

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, proton said:

I would be more concerned about her giving away $25k dollars for people to put a deposit on a house. It's easy to give away other peoples money, that's the problem with socialism, eventually you run out of other people's money- and have to start taxing them more.

Better to give it to Exxon and Elon?

 

[stats]

A trolling post and ensuing reply have been removed.

 

[Yagoda]

17 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Not exactly, but close. Note that the last word in each is therapy. This designates medically supervised procedures performed in the interest of the patient.

 

Genital mutilation is reserved for minority women and the unfortunate accident when they slipped during your circumcision.

OOOOOOOOO reductio ad bigdickums

[bubblegum]

8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Its a "boogyman". 

And what does my assumed sexuality have to do with the argument?

 

 

of topic and thanks for the English lesson

[MicroB]

10 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How is Project 2025 radically anti LGBT? 

https://accountable.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Project-2025-Anti-LGBTQ-Policies-One-Pager.pdf

 

https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

 

Now those are positions you might wholeheartedly support. But they are radical positions, making you a radical. Literally, the definition of a radical is a person who advocates thorough or complete political or social change, or a member of a political party or section of a party pursuing such aims. All of those policies that you are referring to will result in great social change, which you think are for the better, but are, by definition, radical For instance, supporting those invoking  the 1st Amendment as a means to discriminate against some customer, is a pretty radical view. Because the US follows Common Law, using the 1st Amendment as a means to justify some business owners to refuse to serve some customers, because of, essentially lifestyle, might justify someone refusing to serve black people "because they like black music", or women "because women should in the home" etc, or men with asian wives/girlfriends  "because I don't believe in mixing of the races". Its an unwinding of the social contract that has been well established for 30-40 years, and hence a radical change.

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, MicroB said:

https://accountable.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Project-2025-Anti-LGBTQ-Policies-One-Pager.pdf

 

https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

 

Now those are positions you might wholeheartedly support. But they are radical positions, making you a radical. Literally, the definition of a radical is a person who advocates thorough or complete political or social change, or a member of a political party or section of a party pursuing such aims. All of those policies that you are referring to will result in great social change, which you think are for the better, but are, by definition, radical For instance, supporting those invoking  the 1st Amendment as a means to discriminate against some customer, is a pretty radical view. Because the US follows Common Law, using the 1st Amendment as a means to justify some business owners to refuse to serve some customers, because of, essentially lifestyle, might justify someone refusing to serve black people "because they like black music", or women "because women should in the home" etc, or men with asian wives/girlfriends  "because I don't believe in mixing of the races". Its an unwinding of the social contract that has been well established for 30-40 years, and hence a radical change.

But how is Project 2025 radically anti LGBT, are you not able to actually say? 

Edited September 6 by Yellowtail

[stoner]

On 9/5/2024 at 1:01 PM, Jingthing said:

and is only running to dodge prison.

 

oops. 

[stoner]

11 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

and the unfortunate accident when they slipped during your circumcision.

 

wait so you make a trolling comment about another posters dick and its cool ? 

 

 

[cjinchiangrai]

2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

wait so you make a trolling comment about another posters dick and its cool ? 

 

 

After he accuses me of stalking bathrooms? Sure

[stoner]

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

After he accuses me of stalking bathrooms? Sure

 

Why fall for it. Puts you both on the same level. 

[riclag]

18 hours ago, Rob Browder said:

 

Once again, I have the CONSISTENT position - opposing ANY sexual-content directed at children.  Yet those who support pushing "gay" porn on kids will call that "bigoted." 

Brilliantly written  , you have out maneuvered a disturbing group who support 

pushing this agenda .imop

Thanks

 

 

[cjinchiangrai]

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

Why fall for it. Puts you both on the same level. 

He still thinks Stalin came from America. I would have to sink a lot to reach that level of stupid.

[Rob Browder]

18 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Its a "boogyman". 

And what does my assumed sexuality have to do with the argument?

Ergo: if you are against robbery, you must REALLY be a "closet thief."  It's just a silly psychological trick, following the "Frankfurt School" playbook.  In this case, it is particularly revealing, because their attempt to personalize an attack frames the behavior they are defending as an insult. 

[Inderpland]

18 hours ago, bubblegum said:

There is no radical transgender homosexual agenda. You're just scared of the booky man under your bed. Or in your "closet"?

 

 

Maybe he doesn't want company in the closet?

[Rob Browder]

17 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Better to give it to Exxon and Elon?

Agree on ending the Corporate-Welfare subsidies.  But, the solution on housing is to enforce the Felony prohibiting employing illegal-aliens (90%+ will go home), and cancel the foreign-worker visas, so that the housing-shortage situation is reversed. Supply and Demand work best, in these situations.

 

Also, prohibit Blackstone, Blackrock, and other corporations from owning single-family housing - often out-bidding regular folks with cash offers - forcing them to be permanent renters.