The Increasing Dilemma of Prince Andrew: A Royal Scandal Exposed

[Social Media]

 

King Charles, despite his short reign, has faced numerous challenges, but none seems as persistent as the "Prince Andrew problem." As this issue continues to fester, the situation is about to become even more complicated with the upcoming release of a dramatization on Amazon Prime, titled *A Very Royal Scandal*. The show, which delves into the Duke of York's fall from grace, is expected to paint a rather unflattering portrait of the prince, with actor Michael Sheen portraying Andrew as arrogant, delusional, and deeply unpleasant. 

 

In the series, Andrew is depicted as striding through Buckingham Palace, hurling expletives at staff members. His first words in the show are reportedly "f*** off," directed at a footman, a phrase he uses liberally throughout the series. The portrayal suggests a man who is simultaneously pompous and weak, prone to barking orders and insulting those around him, including referring to the Queen’s press secretary as “a little shit” and his loyal aide Amanda Thirsk as “a fatty.”

 

This characterization only adds to the narrative that Andrew’s behavior is intolerable, raising further questions about why King Charles continues to support his non-working brother financially, particularly as the Royal Lodge costs the King over £5 million annually in security and other expenses.

 

The tension between the brothers is palpable, with King Charles making it clear that Andrew must either find a way to fund his own lifestyle or move to the more modest Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. However, Andrew remains defiant, refusing to move while lacking the financial means to sustain his current living arrangements.

 

The new series suggests that after his infamous *Newsnight* interview with Emily Maitlis, where he offered bizarre alibis, Andrew continued to dig himself deeper into scandal. One particularly excruciating scene depicts Andrew traveling to New York to meet with Jeffrey Epstein, essentially begging the convicted sex offender for money to settle his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson’s debts. Epstein agrees, stating the money is a “gift” and that “it’s gone.”

 

Although the series is a dramatization and includes a disclaimer that some scenes have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes, it will be easy for many viewers to believe that such conversations might have taken place behind the closed doors of the palace. The show portrays Andrew as increasingly isolated, clinging to a semblance of dignity as he refuses to leave the Royal Lodge, despite mounting pressure from his brother. 

 

The conflict between Charles and Andrew has reached a point where those close to the King describe it as "the siege of Royal Lodge." Despite no longer being an official working member of the royal family, Andrew seems determined to maintain his status, even as the King's frustration grows. Charles, aware of the damage this situation could cause to the royal family’s reputation, is determined to resolve the issue, emphasizing that Andrew’s association with a convicted sex offender is a stain that could tarnish the monarchy.

 

The dramatization ends with a scene that may soon reflect reality: Andrew, isolated and alone, staring out of the window as his world crumbles around him. As those close to King Charles suggest, life may soon imitate art if Andrew does not heed the warnings he has been given. The King’s patience is running thin, and unless Andrew finds a way to support himself, the offer of Frogmore Cottage may soon be withdrawn, leaving him with little choice but to face the consequences of his pride.

 

Credit: The Times 2024-09-13

 

 

 

Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

[thaibeachlovers]

Seriously, does anyone care about "Randy Andy" now?

 

It's not like he'll become King or do anything useful with whatever is left of his life, IMO.

 

I don't know much about his relationship with Charles to know if Charles cares, but IMO Charles must regret that his family is pretty much a collection of strangers that have been held up to ridicule for many years. Unfortunately, it's not a time to hand it over to the only popular member left, given Kate's health problems.

Edited Thursday at 09:23 PM by thaibeachlovers

[Lacessit]

His grandfather was an over-privileged boor, shagging maids of honor. His father was an adulterer. He continues the tradition.

 

Why anyone except the Brits should give a sh!t about this collection of dysfunctional anachronisms is beyond my comprehension.

.

 

 

[RayC]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

His grandfather was an over-privileged boor, shagging maids of honor. His father was an adulterer. He continues the tradition.

 

Why anyone except the Brits should give a sh!t about this collection of dysfunctional anachronisms is beyond my comprehension.

.

 

 

 

I'm a Brit, Are you suggesting that I should give a <deleted>?

[Lacessit]

47 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

I'm a Brit, Are you suggesting that I should give a <deleted>?

Up to you, it's your King and Queen, not mine.

 

I am still waiting for Australia to grow up.

[JonnyF]

Send him to Montecito. 

 

He can move in with the bitter ginger stepchild and his handler. 

[newbee2022]

5 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

King Charles, despite his short reign, has faced numerous challenges, but none seems as persistent as the "Prince Andrew problem." As this issue continues to fester, the situation is about to become even more complicated with the upcoming release of a dramatization on Amazon Prime, titled *A Very Royal Scandal*. The show, which delves into the Duke of York's fall from grace, is expected to paint a rather unflattering portrait of the prince, with actor Michael Sheen portraying Andrew as arrogant, delusional, and deeply unpleasant. 

 

In the series, Andrew is depicted as striding through Buckingham Palace, hurling expletives at staff members. His first words in the show are reportedly "f*** off," directed at a footman, a phrase he uses liberally throughout the series. The portrayal suggests a man who is simultaneously pompous and weak, prone to barking orders and insulting those around him, including referring to the Queen’s press secretary as “a little <deleted>” and his loyal aide Amanda Thirsk as “a fatty.”

 

This characterization only adds to the narrative that Andrew’s behavior is intolerable, raising further questions about why King Charles continues to support his non-working brother financially, particularly as the Royal Lodge costs the King over £5 million annually in security and other expenses.

 

The tension between the brothers is palpable, with King Charles making it clear that Andrew must either find a way to fund his own lifestyle or move to the more modest Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. However, Andrew remains defiant, refusing to move while lacking the financial means to sustain his current living arrangements.

 

 

The new series suggests that after his infamous *Newsnight* interview with Emily Maitlis, where he offered bizarre alibis, Andrew continued to dig himself deeper into scandal. One particularly excruciating scene depicts Andrew traveling to New York to meet with Jeffrey Epstein, essentially begging the convicted sex offender for money to settle his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson’s debts. Epstein agrees, stating the money is a “gift” and that “it’s gone.”

 

Although the series is a dramatization and includes a disclaimer that some scenes have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes, it will be easy for many viewers to believe that such conversations might have taken place behind the closed doors of the palace. The show portrays Andrew as increasingly isolated, clinging to a semblance of dignity as he refuses to leave the Royal Lodge, despite mounting pressure from his brother. 

 

The conflict between Charles and Andrew has reached a point where those close to the King describe it as "the siege of Royal Lodge." Despite no longer being an official working member of the royal family, Andrew seems determined to maintain his status, even as the King's frustration grows. Charles, aware of the damage this situation could cause to the royal family’s reputation, is determined to resolve the issue, emphasizing that Andrew’s association with a convicted sex offender is a stain that could tarnish the monarchy.

 

The dramatization ends with a scene that may soon reflect reality: Andrew, isolated and alone, staring out of the window as his world crumbles around him. As those close to King Charles suggest, life may soon imitate art if Andrew does not heed the warnings he has been given. The King’s patience is running thin, and unless Andrew finds a way to support himself, the offer of Frogmore Cottage may soon be withdrawn, leaving him with little choice but to face the consequences of his pride.

 

Credit: The Times 2024-09-13

 

 

 

Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Andrew's a stupid useless scumbag. Charly should kick him out to earn his living by himself. ☹️

[Thingamabob]

Met Andrew a few times at chambers of commerce meetings in HK and Singapore. Friendly enough on a one on one basis, but could be rude and bombastic in a crowd. Generally the Saxe-Coburg Gothas/Windsors have a lot to answer for over the years, starting with Britain's totally unnecessary entrance into WW1. I'm not an anti-monarchist in general, however the performance of this bunch over the years leaves a lot to be desired. They may not have direct power but they have enormous influence which they have failed to exercise in the best interests of the UK. 

[Purdey]

I really cannot fathom what job he is qualified to do, should the king kick him out of house and home.

[herfiehandbag]

4 hours ago, Purdey said:

I really cannot fathom what job he is qualified to do, should the king kick him out of house and home.

His Majesty has offered him what must be a good deal, Frogmore Cottage is quite a decent gaffe for a retired single man, even if he does have a "live in divorced wife".

 

He would be a fool not to take it; unfortunately with or without Amazon Prime's drama, it's already established that he is a fool!

Edited Friday at 09:19 AM by herfiehandbag

[impulse]

I'm a Yank, and I'd actually carve out 2 hours or so to watch a historically accurate documentary about how the Royal Family got into the situation they are over the past 80 years (maybe 120 years to include WW1).

 

But I'm going to watch the reviews before deciding whether to watch a docu-drama on Amazon.  I have Prime already, but my time and patience are worth something.  I've already wasted half an hour each of a bunch of crappy movies before deciding I couldn't stomach the next hour and a half.