Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, marin said:

The whole election can be broken down to this.

 

 

ballot.jpg

Can you imagine being that crappy of a candidate that you get beat by that LOL 5555555555555555555

Posted

About the actual for trans inmates I would say providing hormones is reasonable but surgery isn't. 

I'm not aware of a specific Harris position on this issue.

If she had one would it even matter for anything but federal prisons?

As usual fascist racist criminally corrupt Putin loving Trump is happy to demagogue any hot button issue that gets his mouth breather cult all hot and bothered.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

About the actual for trans inmates I would say providing hormones is reasonable but surgery isn't. 

I'm not aware of a specific Harris position on this issue.

If she had one would it even matter for anything but federal prisons?

As usual fascist racist criminally corrupt Putin loving Trump is happy to demagogue any hot button issue that gets his mouth breather cult all hot and bothered.

Well if you arent aware, why are you giving an opinion? Oh wait, you support Kamal Harris, so hide or ignore or spin the fact that she supports the radical homsexual and transgender (both so called, I prefer confused sexuality due to mental illness) paedophiliac agenda while spewing the Iranian bot insults of Russia, criminal, etc. Got it.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

 

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

How is thread allowed to run???

 

No links, no evidence.......?????

Thats how they roll, gnetle readers, constantly screech that which was proven untrue and hide what is, and when they are hung on their own petards, they screech for censorship.

 

Here ya go, enjoy. Dont forget taxpayer mutilations on illegal aliens. You can go back to your Fatty Arbuckle fan club now.

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

 

Thats how they roll, gnetle readers, constantly screech that which was proven untrue and hide what is, and when they are hung on their own petards, they screech for censorship.

 

Here ya go, enjoy. Dont forget taxpayer mutilations on illegal aliens. You can go back to your Fatty Arbuckle fan club now.

 

 

 

I wasn't asking for a link or evidence.

 

I was asking why the thread was allowed to run without either .....doh!

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Most of them are stark raving mad.

'Stark raving mad'? That's a bit harsh, isn't it? I wouldn't call you MAGA cultists stark raving mad (although the jury is still out on a few of you).

Low information, delusional, racist, misogynist, mean and bitter old men - yes. Stark raving mad - (in general) no.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 9/28/2024 at 1:51 AM, Yagoda said:

No. I looked at some of my recent posts and admit I had a mental breakdown. Only a  drunkenloon would vote for her. I think I was on a binge.

 

Looks like we have a ton of loons here though, defending the right of murderers to become women at taxpayer expense and then go off to womens prison. If you vote for her, thats what you support.

 

I just watched Comrade Kamalas border speech. I cant wait to see the Kamala cheerleaders and obsessive Trump haters spin that one.

 

Isn't it the GOP and Trump that stymied the Border bill because they didn't want the Democrats to get the credit for it?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Yagoda said:

i have a great sense of humour. I that Kamalas positions on the issues are funnier than watching Filipino and Thai trannies fight it out for turf on Soi 11. 

 

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Lets analyze this. Clearly a Kamala voter. Clearly a man that therefore celebrates trannies. Yet, he tries to imply that because I know that trannies were fighting on Soi 11 and that it was funny, that is my "home". Ergo, Im a tranny lover and so there is your insult.

Let's analyze this.  Clearly a man that is familiar with activities on Soi 11, or maybe just fabricating, or just spreading gossip.  None of those explanations would be considered a feather in your cap.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
On 9/28/2024 at 7:51 AM, Yagoda said:

No. I looked at some of my recent posts and admit I had a mental breakdown. Only a  drunkenloon would vote for her. I think I was on a binge.

 

Looks like we have a ton of loons here though, defending the right of murderers to become women at taxpayer expense and then go off to womens prison. If you vote for her, thats what you support.

 

I just watched Comrade Kamalas border speech. I cant wait to see the Kamala cheerleaders and obsessive Trump haters spin that one.

Not to be flippant about mental health (indeed a serious issue) but judging by the shrill and, frankly, hysterical tone of your posts are you sure your 'mental breakdown' episode is over?

PM me if you need to talk.

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

Isn't it the GOP and Trump that stymied the Border bill because they didn't want the Democrats to get the credit for it?

 

 

You're not allowed to post that...firstly, because it's true...secondly, it only halved the number of immigrants from 10,000 to 5,000.....go figure!!!

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

 

Let's analyze this.  Clearly a man that is familiar with activities on Soi 11, or maybe just fabricating, or just spreading gossip.  None of those explanations would be considered a feather in your cap.

Dude it was all over the news. If you had any connection to Thailand other than talking about politics here, you would have known about it. Purses flying, wigs ripped off, unnatural screaming 55555555.

 

You support the trans agenda, bully for you.

Posted
4 hours ago, NowNow said:

 

Isn't it the GOP and Trump that stymied the Border bill because they didn't want the Democrats to get the credit for it?

No. They stymied it because was a grandstanding act of political huckstering that would have done nothing to solve the problem.

 

Get out your pen Joe Kamala, close the border. Immediate deportation. Declare a National Emergency, otherwise more children will be screaming under the rape trees. 

 

Its that easy.

Posted
4 hours ago, Inderpland said:

Not to be flippant about mental health (indeed a serious issue) but judging by the shrill and, frankly, hysterical tone of your posts are you sure your 'mental breakdown' episode is over?

PM me if you need to talk.

Why would I talk to you LOL. You stand for everything that decent human beings oppose

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

No. They stymied it because was a grandstanding act of political huckstering that would have done nothing to solve the problem.

 

Get out your pen Joe Kamala, close the border. Immediate deportation. Declare a National Emergency, otherwise more children will be screaming under the rape trees. 

 

Its that easy.

 

 

So they stymied it. Thank you for the confirmation.

  • Like 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

 

So they stymied it. Thank you for the confirmation.

Whjy do you need to to confirm. It was a sh*t bill that did nothing, had objectionable provisions and did nothing.

 

Get out the pen Joe, the brutalized women and children are screaming

Posted
19 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Doesn't matter. He will be outside congress, not a part of it. He'll actually be able to be even more of an attack dog on Harris as will have no constraints on what he can say.

His base will love it.

I think much of his base and most of the GOP will abandon him like a rabid dog after he's a second time loser. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I think much of his base and most of the GOP will abandon him like a rabid dog after he's a second time loser. 

Not as long as Washington exists as it does today. The GOP members in congress likely will abandon him but IMO they only went along because they were scared of his base, and disliked him all the time. Without him they can get back to the business of enriching themselves at taxpayer expense, which is IMO why Trump got elected in the first place.

Far as I can see there is very little difference between career GOP and career Democrats- all in it for themselves.

Posted
14 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

 

Let's analyze this.  Clearly a man that is familiar with activities on Soi 11, or maybe just fabricating, or just spreading gossip.  None of those explanations would be considered a feather in your cap.

Having your apparent opinion of activities on Soi 11 does you no credit.

Posted
14 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

You're not allowed to post that...firstly, because it's true...secondly, it only halved the number of immigrants from 10,000 to 5,000.....go figure!!!

Sooooo, you think 5,000 criminals entering the country is acceptable? That's sad.

Posted
4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Not as long as Washington exists as it does today. The GOP members in congress likely will abandon him but IMO they only went along because they were scared of his base, and disliked him all the time. Without him they can get back to the business of enriching themselves at taxpayer expense, which is IMO why Trump got elected in the first place.

Far as I can see there is very little difference between career GOP and career Democrats- all in it for themselves.

So Trump is a selfless saint who has no concerns whatsoever for personal enrichment, and his entire motivation for being in politics is to improve the quality of life for his supporters? Is that correct? 

 

Let me ask you something during the four years of his presidency did you see any hint of him cleaning the swamp? 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

So Trump is a selfless saint who has no concerns whatsoever for personal enrichment, and his entire motivation for being in politics is to improve the quality of life for his supporters? Is that correct? 

 

Let me ask you something during the four years of his presidency did you see any hint of him cleaning the swamp? 

Your attempt at sarcasm does you no credit. I have never claimed such as you likely know very well, and there was nothing in the post you quoted to support that false claim.

 

Had Sessions not been a <deleted>, there is no telling what Trump may have been able to achieve. Trump should have sacked him the same day the <deleted> recused himself.

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...