Jump to content

Trump appeal against ridiculous fine looks like a winner


theblether

Recommended Posts

Gordon Gecko famously said in the movie Wall Street "greed is good." Sometimes controlling your appetite for revenge is the better course. While he may lose the appeal against conviction, he'll almost certainly get the amount of the fine reduced.

 

"A five-judge New York appellate panel questioned both the size and validity of a judgment of more than $450 million against Donald J. Trump at a hearing."

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/26/nyregion/trump-civil-fraud-penalty-appeals-court.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


41 minutes ago, theblether said:

Gordon Gecko famously said in the movie Wall Street "greed is good." Sometimes controlling your appetite for revenge is the better course. While he may lose the appeal against conviction, he'll almost certainly get the amount of the fine reduced.

 

"A five-judge New York appellate panel questioned both the size and validity of a judgment of more than $450 million against Donald J. Trump at a hearing."

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/26/nyregion/trump-civil-fraud-penalty-appeals-court.html

So, you're just posting your hopes and dreams. OK then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Yes, I agree posting a link to a source hidden behind a paywall is quite laughable.

 

 

 

It wasn't behind a paywall for me but hey, try google - there's plenty of free sources for the same story out there. You'll even read reports on <removed> websites. You'll know where to find them, eh? 

 

Carry on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

It wasn't behind a paywall for me but hey, try google - there's plenty of free sources for the same story out there. You'll even read reports on <removed> websites. You'll know where to find them, eh? 

 

Carry on. 

Then post links to the free sources, instead of wasting people's time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump will get at least a major reduction in the fine.

I agree, they will probably roll it back to the initial fine, but I think they should make a provision that the next time he denounces her again $5 million gets added at each update.  Each of these appeals costs him plenty even without the fine.  Maybe during breaks in the court proceeding he can hawk watches in Foley Square (the location of the courthouse) to try to raise cash for the attorneys.  Or if a Black person comes along he can try to sell them the sneakers.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bendejo said:

I agree, they will probably roll it back to the initial fine, but I think they should make a provision that the next time he denounces her again $5 million gets added at each update.  Each of these appeals costs him plenty even without the fine.  Maybe during breaks in the court proceeding he can hawk watches in Foley Square (the location of the courthouse) to try to raise cash for the attorneys.  Or if a Black person comes along he can try to sell them the sneakers.

 

Different case.

 

This is the NY State case against the Trump Organization.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""