The age factor election: "A vote for Trump could easily be a vote for a President Vance"

[Inderpland]

The president can essentially be fired by the vice president should he become significantly impaired

 

 

If that happens it's time to hide behind the sofa..............wait a minute..🤔

[xylophone]

35 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

The president can essentially be fired by the vice president should he become significantly impaired

 

 

If that happens it's time to hide behind the sofa..............wait a minute..🤔

Very possible as trump is more than halfway there with regards to senility and cognitive decline and this goes to prove it:-

 

Asked if he would “commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support during a Q&A session at the Economic Club of New York Thursday, Trump said:…….

 

“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.

"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.

"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”

 

What the fark was that all about????

[Inderpland]

8 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Very possible as trump is more than halfway there with regards to senility and cognitive decline and this goes to prove it:-

 

Asked if he would “commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support during a Q&A session at the Economic Club of New York Thursday, Trump said:…….

 

“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.

"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.

"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”

 

What the fark was that all about????

The usual word vomit. Yet somehow the MAGA crowd thinks he's fit to lead.😂

[Srikcir]

18 hours ago, Inderpland said:

The president can essentially be fired by the vice president should he become significantly impaired

Not exactly. Removal of the POTUS by other than impeachment of Congress (House & Senate), requires a majority vote of the POTUS Cabinet and VP to do so.

As the POTUS nominates his cabinet members for confirmation by the Senate, Trump would probably want pro-Trump MAGA candidates and a very grateful VP candidate.

In fact removal of POTUS Trump early in his administration was apparently discussed among some cabinet members but as I recall, VP Pence would not agree with Trump's removal.

[Captain Monday]

He won't last 4 years

JD Vance is running for President

Trump is running to stay out of Jail

 

I could see a scenario where Trump resigns early

Once  enthroned , completely without any legal guardrails or re-election concerns. His most base fascist instincts animated. Protected from any prosecution by his hand picked political operatives on the SCOTUS, and project 2025 is fully implemented he may just retire to one of his  Golf courses. 

Edited October 16 by Captain Monday

[Wrwest]

On 10/15/2024 at 1:53 PM, Inderpland said:

The president can essentially be fired by the vice president should he become significantly impaired

 

 

If that happens it's time to hide behind the sofa..............wait a minute..🤔

Nope ... incorrect.

[Hanaguma]

JD would be a great president.  IMHO probably more effective than Trump, and better at dealing with a hostile or very closely split Congress.  Lifting himself out of poverty to serve in the Marine Corps, graduate of Yale Law School, successful in business, bestselling author, Senator, devoted husband and father of three.  No wonder the Democrats are so scared of him. 

[Will B Good]

6 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

JD would be a great president.  IMHO probably more effective than Trump, and better at dealing with a hostile or very closely split Congress.  Lifting himself out of poverty to serve in the Marine Corps, graduate of Yale Law School, successful in business, bestselling author, Senator, devoted husband and father of three.  No wonder the Democrats are so scared of him. 

 

Trump has the most to fear.

 

Vance is playing a blinder.

 

Either way he will be running in 2028.

[Jingthing]

18 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

JD would be a great president.  IMHO probably more effective than Trump, and better at dealing with a hostile or very closely split Congress.  Lifting himself out of poverty to serve in the Marine Corps, graduate of Yale Law School, successful in business, bestselling author, Senator, devoted husband and father of three.  No wonder the Democrats are so scared of him. 

Not successful in business. Backed by an oligarch. A complete failure in his short career as a venture capitalist. Did nothing in the senate. 

[Jingthing]

Neither one is qualified to be anywhere near the oval office.

[Jingthing]

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Trump has the most to fear.

 

Vance is playing a blinder.

 

Either way he will be running in 2028.

Well assuming Trump (hopefully) loses, yes he will likely run in 2028 but he will face stiff primary opposition as a LOSER, and if he loses in a landslide, it would be stupid to even run at all. 

[Hanaguma]

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Not successful in business. Backed by an oligarch. A complete failure in his short career as a venture capitalist. Did nothing in the senate. 

You sound bitter and jealous. He is the best of the 4 left in the running, no question.  Unlike his opponents, he at least had a career outside of politics. 

[Jingthing]

5 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

You sound bitter and jealous. He is the best of the 4 left in the running, no question.  Unlike his opponents, he at least had a career outside of politics. 

I give him credit for the book.

Being picked to be a tool of an anti democracy oligarch is not what I would be bragging about as any kind of career to be proud of.

[Hanaguma]

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I give him credit for the book.

Being picked to be a tool of an anti democracy oligarch is not what I would be bragging about as any kind of career to be proud of.

Sheer jealousy. Just because you're not packing the gear to interest a giant like Peter Thiel.

[Jingthing]

5 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Sheer jealousy. Just because you're not packing the gear to interest a giant like Peter Thiel.

Moronic comment.

I never had an interest in being a venture capitalist.

All you've got is ad hominem garbage.

[Yellowtail]

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Sheer jealousy. Just because you're not packing the gear to interest a giant like Peter Thiel.

Isn't it interesting how the left love JD until he got out of lockstep. Now he's Hitler, like every other Republican that's running for office. 

 

 

[Hanaguma]

8 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Moronic comment.

I never had an interest in being a venture capitalist.

All you've got is ad hominem garbage.

Sure. And calling someone the "tool of an anti democratic oligarch" is what, exactly? 

[Jingthing]

Just now, Hanaguma said:

Sure. And calling someone the "tool of an anti democratic oligarch" is what, exactly? 

Fact.

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Isn't it interesting how the left love JD until he got out of lockstep. Now he's Hitler, like every other Republican that's running for office. 

 

 

What are you on about? 
Before he got into politics he was just a best selling author of one book. 

[Will B Good]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Isn't it interesting how the left love JD until he got out of lockstep. Now he's Hitler, like every other Republican that's running for office. 

 

 

 

 

I'm confused.....I thought Trump is America's Hitler.....now it's Vance????

[Jingthing]

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

I'm confused.....I thought Trump is America's Hitler.....now it's Vance????

They're both pro insurrectionist fascists. Nobody is saying they are exactly the same as Hitler even Vance when he wondered if Trump was America's Hitler. 

[Hanaguma]

11 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Fact.

I feel like I am from the future...as I typed my question I had the strange feeling that this would be your answer. Thanks for being predictable!

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

I feel like I am from the future...as I typed my question I had the strange feeling that this would be your answer. Thanks for being predictable!

Glad to be of service.

[Hanaguma]

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Glad to be of service.

Let's go back to talking about Israel, where we can agree! 

[Yellowtail]

14 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

I'm confused.....I thought Trump is America's Hitler.....now it's Vance????

They're all Hitler. Reagan was Hitler, both Bushes were Hitler, now Trump and Vance are both Hitler. 

[Yellowtail]

17 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

They're both pro insurrectionist fascists. Nobody is saying they are exactly the same as Hitler even Vance when he wondered if Trump was America's Hitler. 

Pro insurrectionist, that's a hoot. 

[Inderpland]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

They're all Hitler. Reagan was Hitler, both Bushes were Hitler, now Trump and Vance are both Hitler. 

And your hyperbole is getting to be a bit to shrill. Try easing the grip on your emotional pearls, okay?

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Let's go back to talking about Israel, where we can agree! 

Israel is interesting.

Israel attacked a Russian base in Syria and not a word from Moscow about red line being crossied.

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Inderpland said:

And your hyperbole is getting to be a bit to shrill. Try easing the grip on your emotional pearls, okay?

Projecting again?

[retarius]

Better Vance in the White House than Kamala. Imagine Walz, who has that horrible pervert look, and whom I certainly would let babysit my kids, in the White House. Sniffing hair would not be the issue....far more serious things would be amiss.