Haley: Election a ‘Wake-Up Call’ for ‘Woke’ Corporations, Government & Political Parties

[Social Media]

 

Former Republican White House candidate Nikki Haley has urged both sides of the political spectrum, as well as corporate and government institutions, to take the recent election results as a critical “wake-up call.” With her former primary rival, President-elect Donald Trump, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris, Haley emphasized the need for reflection and recalibration within the spheres of politics, business, and governance.

This election was a wake up call. Here's what companies, government, and political parties should take away. #NikkiHaleyLive on @SIRIUSXM @Spotify @ApplePodcasts pic.twitter.com/zLnK3g42Ul

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 7, 2024

 

“I think at the end of the day, this should be a wake-up sign for companies that had gone woke,” Haley stated during her Sirius XM radio show. She continued, “This should be a wake-up sign for government, where they got so arrogant they started telling Americans what they should and shouldn’t do. This should be a wake-up call for the Democrat Party that… you don’t need to be leaning left, you need to be coming closer to the center.” 

 

Haley’s words reflect her ongoing concerns about the direction of corporations and government policies that she views as overreaching or increasingly out of touch with mainstream Americans. She has argued that the perception of an elite-driven agenda, whether in boardrooms or in government, has alienated many citizens who feel unheard and dismissed. According to Haley, a recalibration away from what she sees as “woke” ideologies and toward more balanced, center-ground policies could restore a sense of trust and unity within the country.

 

Haley’s endorsement of Trump was a notable turn in her campaign narrative. Though she had been one of Trump’s more outspoken critics on the campaign trail, she ultimately chose to endorse him after dropping out of the race. This decision raised questions about her stance, but Haley has since voiced her support for his candidacy, positioning herself as a pragmatic figure willing to back the Republican cause in hopes of advancing the party’s overall goals.

 

The former South Carolina governor’s remarks add to a broader dialogue within the Republican Party about how best to address national divides and strengthen the party’s appeal to a wider audience. Haley’s call for a return to a more centrist approach suggests her desire to attract a broader base while addressing concerns about an increasingly polarized political climate. For Haley, the recent election isn’t just a Republican victory—it’s a potential moment of reckoning for all players, from corporate leaders to political strategists, as they consider the way forward.

 

Based on a report by the Hill 2024-11-09

 

 

 

[WDSmart]

I am a far-left liberal, and I accept that Trump's election was, in part, a "wake-up call" on what the right-wingers call "woke" issues. However, I think the "wake-up call" should not be taken as a call to change the policies but to try to further educate the public on these issues and what is best for society. I, myself, intend to stay "woke." 

[bradiston]

Now I understand the phrase "word salad". Just a basket of clichés.

[renaissanc]

I don't think that introspection is what Democrat-Marxists do. You can see this from what the elites and the legacy media are now saying. I also don't think that companies will change from being woke because that is their culture now. They'll be hoping that the Democrat-Marxists will win the 2026 elections, though I can't see that happening.

[spidermike007]

There is no question about what she is saying being correct. I'm saying that as a Democrat, the woke thing went way too far, the Democratic party allowed itself to be co-opted by the extreme left, and the election shows how sick and tired of people are of all the woke nonsense, all the trans nonsense, and that stuff being crammed down people's throats on a daily basis. 

 

Personally, I despise PC. And social justice authoritarianism. I think it represents alot of what is wrong with contemporary culture, and especially America today. It is a major form of weakness, when you allow yourself to be easily offended, and take everything personally. Granted, there are things that can be perceived as offensive, but allowing yourself to be offended by tiny little things people say and do is a bit much! But, the people who are offended daily, by things others say, are just weak, and would benefit by growing thicker skin. Life can be rough and caustic at times, and for those of us who have grown thick skin, it is like water off a ducks back. No big deal, at all. Think what you want to think. It just does not mean anything to those with self esteem, and a sense of who and what they are. Granted, these are just my opinions, and some will take offense to them. LOL. 

 

The US is by far the most tolerant country in the world when it comes to the whole trans, non-binary, amorosexual, decide whatever you want today, if it fits mentality. No other country is as loose, driftless, and as silly as the US, except perhaps the UK. 

Edited November 9 by spidermike007

[novacova]

3 hours ago, WDSmart said:

However, I think the "wake-up call" should not be taken as a call to change the policies but to try to further educate the public on these issues and what is best for society. I, myself, intend to stay "woke." 

You don’t get it do you. The public understands fully and conceptually what damage the woke policies are all about and they are frik’n sick and tired of it. The idea of the left “educating the public” is conformity, people don’t like “ideas” imposed upon them and shoved down their throats. I can give a rat’s rearend how other folks choose to live their lives, just don’t insult me with your inclusiveness especially in government institutions.

[WDSmart]

1 minute ago, novacova said:

You don’t get it do you. The public understands fully and conceptually what damage the woke policies are all about and they are frik’n sick and tired of it. The idea of the left “educating the public” is conformity, people don’t like “ideas” imposed upon them and shoved down their throats. I can give a rat’s rearend how other folks choose to live their lives, just don’t insult me with your inclusiveness especially in government institutions.

I do get it. Don't take Trump's victory here as the public's complete abandonment of liberal values. People are sick and tired of worrying about the cost of living and how they are going to adequately support their families. I get that. What I don't get is why they think someone like Trump is going to fix that and "save" them. He won't. His right-wing policies will fail, or he will abandon them and then blame the failure on someone else.

Inclusiveness (DEI) is what a society should be all about, in my opinion. I've always said the difference between the right wing and left wing is the first letter of a two-letter word. Right-wingers are only concerned about Me, whereas left-wingers are concerned about We.

Right now, the majority (slim, 51%/47%) of the US voters are more concerned about themselves and their own families. They think Trump will do something to change that. I would actually love to see Trump do something to help them, but I have no faith that he will be able to do that whatsoever. I predict we are in for at least four years of chaos and turmoil, but not the type of violent turmoil and aggression that Trump inspired after the last election. This will be pitiful social turmoil. 

[James105]

16 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Inclusiveness (DEI) is what a society should be all about, in my opinion. I've always said the difference between the right wing and left wing is the first letter of a two-letter word. Right-wingers are only concerned about Me, whereas left-wingers are concerned about We.

 

Every implementation of DEI I have seen excludes straight white people, so is the complete opposite of inclusiveness.  Not sure how leftists are completely blind to this and expect white people to bend the knee and accept being second class citizens in their own countries.  

[oxo1947]

4 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I think the "wake-up call" should not be taken as a call to change the policies b

 

yer ... Great keep everything all the same way that made you lose to a landslide-----that really does encompass the Woke generation --- "Even when we are wrong--its just a matter of making everyone think the wrong way to"... .......

 

 

" but to try to further educate the public"

The arrogance--they really do think that they are the Educators... ...

 

[WDSmart]

19 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Every implementation of DEI I have seen excludes straight white people, so is the complete opposite of inclusiveness.  Not sure how leftists are completely blind to this and expect white people to bend the knee and accept being second class citizens in their own countries.  

DEI might seem to "exclude" straight White people (only right-handed ones 😉 ) because, before DEI and its predecessor, Affirmative Action, preference was given to straight White people. DEI is an attempt to make sure that kind of preference is not practiced anymore.

White people don't have to accept being "second-class citizens." They have to accept now that all others are also "first-class citizens." 

Historical Context of DEI in the Workplace - Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Blog Post By Juan Taveras (He/Him/His)

Edited November 9 by WDSmart

[James105]

3 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

DEI might seem to "exclude" straight White people (only right-handed ones 😉 ) because, before DEI and its predecessor, Affirmative Action, preference was given to straight White people. DEI is an attempt to make sure that kind of preference is not practiced anymore.

White people don't have to accept being "second-class citizens." They have to accept now that all others are also "first-class citizens." 

Historical Context of DEI in the Workplace - Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Blog Post By Juan Taveras (He/Him/His)

 

On this you are correct, which is why they voted in Trump.   Using racist policies to correct previous racist policies from decades ago is racist.   Do better, be less racist by treating everyone equally and maybe then people will give the left a chance again.  

[RichardColeman]

The democrats have seen that a far left agenda wins them nothing but the worst defeats in decades. They have two choices, expel the far woke left and run on a more moderate line, or try to please moderates and far liberal lefties at the same time  and end up in the same chaos in 4 years time. 

 

Personally I think Trump might be the person that rebuilds the democrats into a more reasonable party.

 

 

 

 

[novacova]

1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

Inclusiveness (DEI) is what a society should be all about

100% erroneous. Society should be about merit not doling out awards based on looks. Stop insulting yourself.

1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

This will be pitiful social turmoil.

You really sound hopeful.

Edited November 9 by novacova

[WDSmart]

8 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

On this you are correct, which is why they voted in Trump.   Using racist policies to correct previous racist policies from decades ago is racist.   Do better, be less racist by treating everyone equally and maybe then people will give the left a chance again.  

DEI is not Affirmative Action, which was an attempt to "correct" situations arising from White-favoring racist policies in the past. DEI is only trying to ensure that no racist (or other prejudicial) policies will continue in the present.

[WDSmart]

1 minute ago, novacova said:

1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

Inclusiveness (DEI) is what a society should be all about

100% erroneous. Society should be about merit not doling out awards based on looks. Stop insinuating yourself.

Your status in society should not be based on merit—that's a feature of capitalism. Your status in society should be equal to everyone else's—that's a feature of socialism.

[novacova]

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

DEI is not Affirmative Action, which was an attempt to "correct" situations arising from White-favoring racist policies in the past. DEI is only trying to ensure that no racist (or other prejudicial) policies will continue in the present.

The left using race is racist in of itself. Use race as a prop to further a political agenda. This is why so many minorities are waking up to the scam. 

[novacova]

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Your status in society should not be based on merit—that's a feature of capitalism. Your status in society should be equal to everyone else's—that's a feature of socialism.

This idea is the beginning of the fall of a nation. Utter stupidity, plain and simple.

[blazes]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

 

The US is by far the most tolerant country in the world when it comes to the whole trans, non-binary, amorosexual, decide whatever you want today, if it fits mentality. No other country is as loose, driftless, and as silly as the US, except perhaps the UK. 

 

Try Canada....

Edited November 9 by blazes

[James105]

21 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

DEI is not Affirmative Action, which was an attempt to "correct" situations arising from White-favoring racist policies in the past. DEI is only trying to ensure that no racist (or other prejudicial) policies will continue in the present.

 

DEI is racist.  People who support it are racist.   Nobody likes a racist.  This is why the left lost.   

[frank83628]

5 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I am a far-left liberal, and I accept that Trump's election was, in part, a "wake-up call" on what the right-wingers call "woke" issues. However, I think the "wake-up call" should not be taken as a call to change the policies but to try to further educate the public on these issues and what is best for society. I, myself, intend to stay "woke." 

then you will lose again, the majority of people don't want it

[WDSmart]

14 minutes ago, novacova said:

The left using race is racist in of itself. Use race as a prop to further a political agenda. This is why so many minorities are waking up to the scam. 

The left and DEI are not using race (or any other feature) as a "prop to further a political agenda." They are trying to eliminate racism and other prejudices from the workplace.

[WDSmart]

4 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

DEI is racist.  People who support it are racist.   Nobody likes a racist.  This is why the left lost.   

DEI is not racist, nor does it advocate any other prejudices. DEI is an attempt to make sure that racism and other prejudices are not practiced in the workplace. Like I said before, it is not Affirmative Action.

[WDSmart]

5 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

5 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I am a far-left liberal, and I accept that Trump's election was, in part, a "wake-up call" on what the right-wingers call "woke" issues. However, I think the "wake-up call" should not be taken as a call to change the policies but to try to further educate the public on these issues and what is best for society. I, myself, intend to stay "woke." 

then you will lose again, the majority of people don't want it

I will not lose. I didn't lose this time. I will be the same years from now as I am today. The people who lost are the ones who were conned into voting for Trump.

[frank83628]

7 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I will not lose. I didn't lose this time. I will be the same years from now as I am today. The people who lost are the ones who were conned into voting for Trump.

no, they won, WON WON you LOST LOST. but if you dont see that the woke crap is not what the majority want, you ie the woke, will lose again.

[blaze master]

11 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I will be the same years from now as I am today.

 

This luxury you have in life comes from capitalism. Funny that. 

[WDSmart]

20 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

no, they won, WON WON you LOST LOST. but if you dont see that the woke crap is not what the majority want, you ie the woke, will lose again.

It is you who do not understand. I am woke.  I will remain woke. It doesn't matter to me if that's not what the majority of my fellow citizens want right now, and I didn't lose. I kept my values. I only hope more of my fellow citizens will develop those values in the future. I think four more years of Trump might help them see the results of rejecting those values. And actually, I don't think they reject these values. I think they've just put their own interests above them. 

[WDSmart]

23 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

This luxury you have in life comes from capitalism. Funny that. 

The joy and peace I have in life come from my socialist values. 

[blaze master]

3 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

The joy and peace I have in life come from my socialist values. 

 

What a load of dung. Your comfy life comes from the value you were able to obtain over your career at work which now affords you that peace. Your values are grandstanding.

Edited November 9 by blaze master

[WDSmart]

1 minute ago, blaze master said:

 

What a load of dung. Your comfy life comes from the value you were able to obtain over your career at work. 

 

Which now affords you that peace. Your values are grandstanding.

My values are much more important to me than my finances and always have been.

[blaze master]

Just now, WDSmart said:

My values are much more important to me than my finances and always have been.

 

Nonsense. You pursued money as a career and not those values. 

 

Hypocritical at best.