Court Hears Accusations of 'Web of Lies' in Conor McGregor Rape Trial

[Social Media]

 

A woman who alleges she was raped by Irish mixed martial arts star Conor McGregor in 2018 has faced intense cross-examination in a Dublin court, with defense lawyers accusing her of fabricating parts of her story. Nikita Hand, who is seeking civil damages from McGregor and another man, claims she was sexually assaulted by McGregor in a hotel room in December 2018. 

 

 

During her testimony, Hand described a harrowing encounter in which she says McGregor pinned her to a bed and raped her. The case, which has drawn considerable attention, saw Hand recount the trauma of the alleged assault, though her credibility came under close scrutiny as the defense raised inconsistencies in her statements.

 

Hand's emotional testimony was followed by pointed cross-examination from Remy Farrell SC, the defense attorney representing McGregor. Farrell highlighted a key contradiction in Hand’s account: she had allegedly told her ex-partner that McGregor had threatened to kill her after the assault.

 

However, when questioned, Hand struggled to recall whether McGregor had made such a threat. "You told your former partner that 'he told me he'd kill me'. That was a reference to McGregor, wasn't it?" Farrell asked. Hand confirmed the statement but then failed to substantiate the claim during subsequent police interviews or in court. "Is that something that happened or didn’t?" Farrell pressed. Hand’s response was unclear: "I can't remember."

 

Further discrepancies were uncovered as the defense challenged Hand on statements she made about the events following the alleged assault. She had reportedly told her ex-partner she had taken a taxi with a friend after leaving the Beacon Hotel, where the attack supposedly took place. Hand admitted under cross-examination that this was untrue and that she had been alone in the taxi. She explained she had made the statement to reassure her ex-partner that she was okay, but Farrell suggested that these fabrications were part of a broader "web of lies" she had woven.

 

"You were telling lies to your ex-partner and he was catching you out on some," Farrell remarked. Hand responded tearfully, explaining that she had been in a state of shock and distress after the alleged assault. "I was raped and battered a few hours before that, so my mind wasn’t perfect at the time," she said. "I didn’t care about anything at the time. All I cared about was my body and how hurt I was."

 

Meanwhile, another aspect of the case involving James Lawrence, a co-defendant, was raised during the trial. Lawrence, who is accused of being involved in the events of that night, was implicated in the case primarily due to his own statements to police. Lawrence had reportedly told authorities in January 2019 that he and Hand had engaged in consensual sex. His defense lawyer, John Fitzgerald SC, further claimed that during the evening in question, McGregor and Hand were heard having "pleasurable" sex in the hotel room, while Lawrence and Hand’s friend were also engaged in sexual activity in the next room.

 

Fitzgerald suggested that Hand was fully aware of what was happening with her friend and Lawrence, alleging that she had seen them together. "I think this is another made-up story," Hand responded firmly, denying Fitzgerald's assertions.

 

The defense also questioned Hand's denial of having sex with Lawrence, who reportedly told police they had engaged in intercourse twice. "Lies," Hand declared, dismissing the claim as untrue. When asked directly by Fitzgerald, "You think he's lying about having sex with you?" she responded with a resolute "Absolutely."

 

As the trial continues, the contrast between Hand's testimony and the defense’s claims has raised significant questions about the truth of her allegations. Hand’s emotional distress and contradictions in her statements have complicated the narrative of what transpired on that night in December 2018, as the court grapples with the complex and contentious nature of the case. 

 

The trial is set to continue as both sides prepare to present further evidence. Hand’s pursuit of civil damages remains at the heart of the legal battle, while McGregor and Lawrence continue to deny all allegations.

 

Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-11

 

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

7 minutes ago, Social Media said:

Hand’s pursuit of civil damages remains at the heart of the legal battle,

Seems that is the whole and entire point of allegations of something that apparently she did nothing about for many years.

 

Perhaps she read about Trump paying large for Daniels and thought she could mint it was well. It's simple to lie that consensual sex wasn't, given there will be no written contract.

[JonnyF]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Seems that is the whole and entire point of allegations of something that apparently she did nothing about for many years.

 

Perhaps she read about Trump paying large for Daniels and thought she could mint it was well. It's simple to lie that consensual sex wasn't, given there will be no written contract.

 

She probably found out how much he got paid for the Mayweather fight. 

 

One night stands are getting very dangerous if you happen to be wealthy. 

[fredwiggy]

The rich and famous are targets for opportunists, and also think they can do whatever they want and get away with it. Hardest thing to prosecute without real evidence, and many women don't come forward because of threats or fear of embarrassment. More and more people are supporting a woman's decision to not let this pass, as it isn't their fault when a predator attacks, but some just want to make money and accuse others who are innocent, which is despicable.

[impulse]

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Seems that is the whole and entire point of allegations of something that apparently she did nothing about for many years.

 

Perhaps she read about Trump paying large for Daniels and thought she could mint it was well. It's simple to lie that consensual sex wasn't, given there will be no written contract.

 

It's probably not coincidental that he just said he may run for office.

 

[CallumWK]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

She probably found out how much he got paid for the Mayweather fight. 

 

One night stands are getting very dangerous if you happen to be wealthy. 

 

[Mburo]

The woman did originally press criminal changes against McGregor but the State Prosecutor said there was insufficient evidence to bring a criminal charge, So, she then went the civil route. 

[john donson]

no cctv in the hotel?  her running out half naked and screaming for help and police ?

[RayC]

12 hours ago, Mburo said:

The woman did originally press criminal changes against McGregor but the State Prosecutor said there was insufficient evidence to bring a criminal charge, So, she then went the civil route. 

 

Thanks for posting a fact. Unfortunately, it lives in splendid isolation amongst the bias, misogynist opinion in this thread.

 

I have no idea whether a rape took place as I haven't followed the case or read the evidence. However, trivialities such as having a prior knowledge of the details of the case do not stop the misogynists knowing that McGregor has no case to answer.  Instead, they know intuitively that the woman was an opportunist, who was influenced by McGregor's purse for the Mayweather fight among other things to gain a 'pay day'. 

[thaibeachlovers]

17 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

She probably found out how much he got paid for the Mayweather fight. 

 

One night stands are getting very dangerous if you happen to be wealthy. 

The rich can afford escorts, so they are stupid if they hide the sausage with a stranger.

Remember the rich guy that got slaughtered by some woman that he did it with in a cleaning cupboard at a restaurant, or something like that?

 

Just as well there is no big pay off for women doing the nasty with Joe Bloggs, or the courts would be backed up for years.

[RayC]

12 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 

Just as well there is no big pay off for women doing the nasty with Joe Bloggs, or the courts would be backed up for years.

 

So basically women are money-grabbing prostitutes in your eyes?

[josephbloggs]

12 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The rich can afford escorts, so they are stupid if they hide the sausage with a stranger.

Remember the rich guy that got slaughtered by some woman that he did it with in a cleaning cupboard at a restaurant, or something like that?

 

Just as well there is no big pay off for women doing the nasty with Joe Bloggs, or the courts would be backed up for years.

Leave me out of this.

[darbie-foos]

this Irish loser must have democrat lawyers fit only for parking violations.

[metisdead]

Off topic posts trolling about Trump and the replies have been removed.