1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

The Military cannot stop the immigrants under international law!

International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974

 

47 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

It can if they aren't on the water.

 

17 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Under SOLAS and other International Rules and treaties they cannot be ordered to do so legally!

 

51 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The UK military  is still necessary for guarding our nuclear deterrent.

 

 

So we've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great.

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

 

Edited November 12, 20241 yr by BruceWayne

3 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

 

 

 

So we've established that they either can't or won't defend the borders.

 

So still wondering what the point of the UK army is.

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

 

What a ranting and stupid response!

I suggest you get off the bar stool, go home and go for a sleep!

37 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

 

 

 

So we've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great.

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

31 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What a ranting and stupid response!

I suggest you get off the bar stool, go home and go for a sleep!

 

Too thick to answer the question so resort to whataboutery & insults. 

Classy 👍

 

C'mon someone, anyone:

 

We've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great - might as well fire them and save taxpayers the money..

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

Edited November 12, 20241 yr by BruceWayne

21 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

To thick to answer the question so resort to whataboutery & insults. 

Classy 👍

 

C'mon someone, anyone:

 

We've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great.

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

Yet more incoherent  ramblings! 

2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Yet more incoherent  ramblings! 

 

27 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

Too thick to answer the question so resort to whataboutery & insults. 

Classy 👍

 

C'mon someone, anyone:

We've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great - might as well fire them and save taxpayers the money..

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

 

Edited November 12, 20241 yr by BruceWayne

50 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Under SOLAS and other International Rules and treaties they cannot be ordered to do so legally!

 

My comment was not related to your SOLAS reference. Don't mix things up.

43 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

 

 

 

So we've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great.

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

 

 

 

 

The only thing that you have established is that you are a prat.

57 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Under SOLAS and other International Rules and treaties they cannot be ordered to do so legally!

 

Under SOLAS regs these flaky rubber ducks should not be at sea in the first place. Talk to the French.

25 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

The only thing that you have established is that you are a prat.

 

58 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

Too thick to answer the question so resort to insults. 

Classy 👍

 

C'mon someone, anyone:

 

We've established that they either can't or won't defend the UK's borders.

Great - might as well fire them and save taxpayers the money..

 

Only need a couple of hundred 'to protect our nuclear 'deterrent' (you actually think someone's gonna steal them?) but

what about the rest of the 10s of thousands of expensive to run grifters in green?

 

Are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

UK army should grow a set or get a proper job imho.

 

You know this is accurate:

 

What’s more triggering?

A veteran hearing a loud bang?

 

Or us getting our tax bills that pay for all their fun adventures?

 

Definitely the tax bills.

 

I don’t even think loud bangs scare them, it’s a ploy to get free Oxy and reduced fees for boarding schools.

 

Anyway, are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

YOU / Your 'heroes' irl:

 

Edited November 12, 20241 yr by BruceWayne

1 hour ago, sungod said:

Most kids only have 1 set of parents, I don’t think military kids are any different unless you know better?

 

I'm trying to figure out if you're so dim you didn't notice the obvious error, or so childish that you would point out such an obvious mistake, ignoring the content, just to be unpleasant...  🤔

40 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

What’s more triggering?

A veteran hearing a loud bang?

 

Or us getting our tax bills that pay for all their fun adventures?

 

Definitely the tax bills.

 

I don’t even think loud bangs scare them, it’s a ploy to get free Oxy and reduced fees for boarding schools.

 

Anyway, are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

YOU / Your 'heroes' irl:

 

 

I'll have to have a word with Alfred about increasing your medication, Batpig.

9 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

I'll have to have a word with Alfred about increasing your medication, Batpig.

 

Anyway, since the UK army can't or won't defend UK boprders, are they just there to kill brown people cos some American or other politician commands them to? - is that the whole point or WHAT???

 

WHAT *EXACTLY* ARE WE PAYING YOU FOR???

 

At least Thai Army do a coup whenever the politicians get out of hand.

 

 

15 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Both sets of parents?

Still looking for a non existent reason to attack military families I see.

If a family live in military housing, when the one in the military ( could be either ) is deployed they lose the house they were living in, as they get another one on the new base. Are you suggesting that only one deploys and the other stays behind for years and years, and that they be provided with 2 different accommodations, one in each location? If they did that you'd be complaining that the military was wasting money on too much accommodation.

11 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I'm trying to figure out if you're so dim you didn't notice the obvious error, or so childish that you would point out such an obvious mistake, ignoring the content, just to be unpleasant...  🤔

I worked it out, but are you really saying that parents should be split up for years and years? Good way to increase the divorce rate.

11 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

I'll have to have a word with Alfred about increasing your medication, Batpig.

I think it's a case beyond the help of medication.

12 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

The only thing that you have established is that you are a prat.

It's people like that that are the first to complain that the military wasn't fast enough to save their ass when they are sitting on their roof top above the flood or suchlike.

 

 

13 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I'm trying to figure out if you're so dim you didn't notice the obvious error, or so childish that you would point out such an obvious mistake, ignoring the content, just to be unpleasant...  🤔

With the amount of ridiculous questions you keep asking it seems you are the most dim around here, that or just argumentative as you have nothing else going on in your life.

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I worked it out, but are you really saying that parents should be split up for years and years? Good way to increase the divorce rate.

I'm glad someone has worked him out, he's as incoherent as his mate Bruce Wayne to me!

23 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t hold the view that those in private education are all Tarquin/Peregrine and Privileged, nor do I hold the view that the ‘common man’ who does not send his children to private school ‘smoke and drink their way through life’.

 

 

 

 

in the 1950's to mid  early70's most people smoked it  was  social norm that the period i was discussing as thats  the one that affected me

6 hours ago, sungod said:

With the amount of ridiculous questions you keep asking it seems you are the most dim around here, that or just argumentative as you have nothing else going on in your life.

 

Can you give examples?  It's just you sound more like you're being unpleasant than actually making any kind of point (which suggests you do not have one to make).

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I worked it out, but are you really saying that parents should be split up for years and years? Good way to increase the divorce rate.

 

So, if someone is working abroad for the British military, they would earn enough so that their spouse does not have to work, but their children's education will be paid for by the British public?  That's how you think it should be?

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Still looking for a non existent reason to attack military families I see.

 

How have I attacked anyone?  What are you talking about?

 

Don't assume they everyone sees the world in the same way as you.

 

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If a family live in military housing, when the one in the military ( could be either ) is deployed they lose the house they were living in, as they get another one on the new base. Are you suggesting that only one deploys and the other stays behind for years and years, and that they be provided with 2 different accommodations, one in each location? If they did that you'd be complaining that the military was wasting money on too much accommodation.

 

Why do they need to be in military housing?  Where are their wages going?

 

Are you suggesting that simply for being in the military, they should get everything for free?

7 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

How have I attacked anyone?  What are you talking about?

 

Don't assume they everyone sees the world in the same way as you.

 

 

Why do they need to be in military housing?  Where are their wages going?

 

Are you suggesting that simply for being in the military, they should get everything for free?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f48e69ed3bf7f5d7cce63d9/SFA-SLA-Accommodation-Charges.pdf

Another off topic post and video removed @BruceWayne

1 hour ago, BangkokReady said:

Are you suggesting that simply for being in the military, they should get everything for free?

 

 

Yes they are.

 

These guys are mercenary freeloaders.

 

Willing to stop dinghy people invading the UK on a daily basis? 

" I can't - its agAInst dA lAW"

 

Willing to participate in unethical middle eastern escapades that don't benefit the UK population in any way?

Zero hesitation

 

If they want to run around foreign countries they should take that into account and pay for the own kids schooling - with ZERO subsidies.

 

If they're willing, as an organisation, to take a stand against their the ongoing dinghy invasion then maybe.

However, defending the UK should be their number one priority - it's what taxpayyers expect AT MINIMUM

 

Unbelieveable thesde freeloaders can't get their heads around that.

Typical ME, ME, ME merchants - like politicians but without any brains

 

 

9 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

So, if someone is working abroad for the British military, they would earn enough so that their spouse does not have to work, but their children's education will be paid for by the British public?  That's how you think it should be?

Your post bears no relationship to reality, so I am unable to answer it.

7 hours ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

Yes they are.

 

These guys are mercenary freeloaders.

 

Willing to stop dinghy people invading the UK on a daily basis? 

" I can't - its agAInst dA lAW"

 

Willing to participate in unethical middle eastern escapades that don't benefit the UK population in any way?

Zero hesitation

 

If they want to run around foreign countries they should take that into account and pay for the own kids schooling - with ZERO subsidies.

 

If they're willing, as an organisation, to take a stand against their the ongoing dinghy invasion then maybe.

However, defending the UK should be their number one priority - it's what taxpayyers expect AT MINIMUM

 

Unbelieveable thesde freeloaders can't get their heads around that.

Typical ME, ME, ME merchants - like politicians but without any brains

 

 

Given your vile and ignorant posts, I am putting you on ignore so I don't have to read them any more.

7 hours ago, BruceWayne said:

 

Willing to stop dinghy people invading the UK on a daily basis? 

" I can't - its agAInst dA lAW"

 

 

   Would you be in favour of the British Royal navy shooting the dinghies and the occupants all drowning in the sea ?

24 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Would you be in favour of the British Royal navy shooting the dinghies and the occupants all drowning in the sea ?

 

I'll answer the question:  Absolutely.

 

It's an invasion and needs to be stopped.

Illegals stabbing young girls, committing crime etc - currently all OK with 'servicemen'

 

Difficult problems often require difficult solutions.

 

But 

 

 

Edited November 13, 20241 yr by BruceWayne

16 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

I'll answer the question:  Absolutely.

 

 

   So you would favour killing innocent woman and children who were on those boats ?

   What if it was a boat sailing from Gaza with innocent Palestinian woman and children aboard ?

  Kill them all ?