Trump Moves Forward with Hardline Immigration Strategy

[thaibeachlovers]

15 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

So, going by your rhetoric, rich people have a right to use their wealth to buy up bank repossessed mortgages, thereby transferring wealth even faster from the poor to the rich.

Deflection.

[radiochaser]

On 11/12/2024 at 9:47 PM, pattayasan said:

 

You never mentioned 90 trillion?

You asked for a link for the 90 trillion.   You got a link for the 90 trillion.   I included a copy and paste from the article itself. 

Did click and go to read the article?  If you had done that you would have also read this ..  100 trillion over 20 years.   

 

"In 2009, Jacobson helped write a Scientific American article, the main findings of which were later published in a peer-reviewed paper, that concluded it would cost about $100 trillion over 20 years to wean the world entirely off fossil fuels. Since then, he has been focused on producing U.S.- and state-specific plans."

https://www.climatecentral.org/news/90-trillion-climate-cookbook-18035

[illisdean]

The strategy is Tom Homan and his message to the cartels: "you're DONE". Illegal immigration will "evaporate" under Trump. just as he promised.

 

 

[Hawaiian]

2 hours ago, illisdean said:

The strategy is Tom Homan and his message to the cartels: "you're DONE". Illegal immigration will "evaporate" under Trump. just as he promised.

 

 

Harris and her loony supporters are a disgrace to America.  She doesn't even come close to talking sense.

[candide]

7 hours ago, radiochaser said:

You asked for a link for the 90 trillion.   You got a link for the 90 trillion.   I included a copy and paste from the article itself. 

Did click and go to read the article?  If you had done that you would have also read this ..  100 trillion over 20 years.   

 

"In 2009, Jacobson helped write a Scientific American article, the main findings of which were later published in a peer-reviewed paper, that concluded it would cost about $100 trillion over 20 years to wean the world entirely off fossil fuels. Since then, he has been focused on producing U.S.- and state-specific plans."

https://www.climatecentral.org/news/90-trillion-climate-cookbook-18035

I don't think that anyone hopes to get rid of 100% of fossil energy.

 

Actually 100 trillions over 20 years is not that expensive. It's 5 trillion/year and the world GDP is currently around 110 trilion (and increases every year).

There are also too many unknown aspects as technologies and costs are evolving fast, so any cost forecast will be rapidly obsolete.

[ModdaPunk]