Social Media Posted November 13, 2024 Posted November 13, 2024 Special Counsel Jack Smith is reportedly planning to retire before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, effectively sidestepping any immediate attempts by the incoming president to remove him from office. This early retirement would prevent Trump, who has vowed to “fire” Smith within “two seconds” of taking the oath of office, from taking direct action against the man responsible for leading high-profile investigations against him. Smith, whose work has focused on federal criminal cases tied to Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election and his handling of classified documents, is aiming to conclude his cases ahead of Trump’s anticipated return to the presidency on January 20, 2025. According to sources cited by the New York Times, Smith’s choice to retire ahead of Trump’s inauguration aligns with his commitment to complete his prosecutorial responsibilities while avoiding direct confrontation with the next administration. This decision highlights the longstanding Department of Justice policy of avoiding the prosecution of a sitting president, a principle that has shaped Smith’s timeline. DOJ officials reportedly believe that pursuing charges against a sitting president would be both legally and practically challenging, given the power of the executive office. Therefore, as Trump’s presidency looms, the DOJ appears ready to wrap up its pursuits to ensure that any remaining cases can be handled without direct presidential interference. Smith’s proactive departure reflects the broader strategy among federal prosecutors and officials who anticipate Trump’s potential moves to dismiss or undermine those involved in any criminal cases against him. Trump’s statement that he would waste no time firing the special counsel underscores his discontent with Smith’s investigations and hints at his likely approach to handling those in government positions linked to actions against him. By retiring before the presidential handover, Smith not only completes his work on his own terms but also reinforces a protective boundary against political retribution. The decision ultimately highlights the tension between presidential power and the Department of Justice’s mission of upholding the rule of law. For Smith, retiring early becomes both a professional safeguard and a message of independence, signaling that his work concludes on his own timeline and not at the behest of the new administration. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-12
Popular Post Purdey Posted November 14, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 14, 2024 He should reveal his evidence, if that is what it is, to the public before retiring. 3
HK MacPhooey Posted November 14, 2024 Posted November 14, 2024 A bit like DeNiro and others vowing to leave the US is Trump is re-elected - we’ll believe it when we see it😃 1
illisdean Posted November 14, 2024 Posted November 14, 2024 He will resign and hold his recent Judge Cannon ruling appeal in "abeyance" as he has already so done. Biden's DOJ and Smith fear the 11th circuit ruling which likely upholds Cannons ruling disqualifying Smith as a legitimate special counsel in the MAL doc case and that puts him/ them up $hit creek with no paddle. As well, despite having ZERO legal merit these Biden / DOJ lawfare cases against Trump were designed to imprison him and prevent his re-election. They have FAILED as democrats usually do and without any tangible political value now post Trump election LANDSLIDE victory, it's all over for the feckless SC Jack Smith. Trump / MAGA are in charge of the gov't and running the country. 2
Skeptic7 Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 On 11/14/2024 at 12:29 PM, illisdean said: Biden's DOJ and Smith fear the 11th circuit ruling which likely upholds Cannons ruling disqualifying Smith No fear by the DOJ nor Smith. The 11th Circuit has already sternly overturned Cannon twice for ignorantly and arrogantly overstepping her authority...and likely will do so again.
illisdean Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 3 hours ago, Skeptic7 said: No fear by the DOJ nor Smith. The 11th Circuit has already sternly overturned Cannon twice for ignorantly and arrogantly overstepping her authority...and likely will do so again. Won't get the chance, appeals in abeyance now and incoming Trump DOJ $hit-cans both the doc case AND Jack Smith, if he's dumb enough to hang around. He should probably lawyer up too.
thaibeachlovers Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 Trump isn't even POTUS and the rats are abandoning the sinking ship ( the Democrats ) already. Well done Mr Trump.
illisdean Posted November 25, 2024 Posted November 25, 2024 Oh looky here, more good news for Trump haters and it's all bad. Remember that J6 insurrection indictment....ah, I mean the charge of violating the Ku Klux Klan Act, Third Enforcement Act, Third Ku Klux Klan Act, Civil Rights Act of 1871...thats the one, well the feckless and illegitimately appointed SC Jack Smith just dismissed the J6 indictment against President Trump. Another big MAGA win (albeit expected WIN). Please leave your comments showing support of this huge win for Trump and democracy, constitutional rule of law and justice. UPDATE: SC Jack Smith just OFFICIALLY $hit-canned the MAL documents case too.
illisdean Posted November 25, 2024 Posted November 25, 2024 12 minutes ago, illisdean said: Another big MAGA win (albeit expected WIN) Bogus indictments meant only to jail Trump and prevent him from being re-elected. Biden/Harris are perfect failures, and Americans are on to them. The MAGA LANDSLIDE election victory is proof. 1
Patong2021 Posted November 25, 2024 Posted November 25, 2024 22 minutes ago, illisdean said: Bogus indictments meant only to jail Trump and prevent him from being re-elected. Biden/Harris are perfect failures, and Americans are on to them. The MAGA LANDSLIDE election victory is proof. The indictments were not "bogus". Try as he might, trump never could have the charges dismissed prior to the election. Trump's walking away from the charges comes because of a legal technicality and not because he was not guilty of the charges. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now