Jump to content

Revealed, Why Kamala Harris Skipped Joe Rogan Interview


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

A senior adviser to Kamala Harris’ campaign, Jennifer Palmieri, recently revealed new insights into why the Vice President opted not to appear on Joe Rogan's podcast—a decision that sparked debate among political observers and campaign staff alike. Speaking at a Clearing House conference in New York City on Wednesday, Palmieri, a senior adviser to Harris’ husband Doug Emhoff, explained that internal resistance from some progressive members of Harris’ team played a significant role in the decision. According to the *Financial Times*, Palmieri stated, “There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn’t want her to be on it.”

 

Harris’ decision to forego the interview has been a point of criticism among political pundits, especially after former President Donald Trump’s well-received appearance on Rogan’s show, which drew significant attention from male voters. Many analysts believe Harris could have benefited from connecting with Rogan’s large, predominantly male audience—a demographic that, as critics point out, could have been valuable heading into Election Day.

 

Palmieri elaborated on the tense dynamic that arose once Harris began considering the interview, suggesting that the situation became complicated for Rogan as well. “Because all of a sudden he’s on his heels about how his audience is going to react to this, and the demands that they were going to put on him to be tough on her,” she said, hinting that Rogan might have faced pressure to challenge Harris assertively if she had agreed to appear.

 

While Harris has yet to publicly address her decision to pass on the opportunity, the issue has stirred speculation over whether it was a missed chance for her campaign to engage a broader base of voters.

 

Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-15

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a wise move.

 

The more she spoke, the more people realized what an inept, clueless, annoying, empty vessel she was.

 

3 hours with Rogan would have destroyed her. 

 

Kamala Harris. What could have been, unburdened, by what never was. 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

It was a wise move.

 

The more she spoke, the more people realized what an inept, clueless, annoying, empty vessel she was.

 

3 hours with Rogan would have destroyed her. 

 

Kamala Harris. What could have been, unburdened, by what never was. 😄

You called this right.   Where is TUG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that she even had progressive members on her staff is very telling, the progressive left is a large part of the reason why she lost the election, the fealty that Democratic Congress members felt toward the progressive left was a large part of why she lost the election. Everything about the extreme side of the progressive left is toxic and they should be cast aside.

 

A large part of why Trump won this election was not because he's a great man, or will event turn out to be a mediocre president, but because he was the lesser of two terrible candidates. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...