connda Posted Thursday at 01:51 PM Posted Thursday at 01:51 PM Russian RS-26 Rubezh ICBM delivering conventional MIRVs to the Dnipro region. "Putin's Bluffing - hit them with more Storm Shadows and ATACAMs. GRRR!" Got Bunker? Anyone want to revisit my poll about a nuclear war starting before the end of 2024? hold.mp4 1
Popular Post jas007 Posted Thursday at 03:41 PM Popular Post Posted Thursday at 03:41 PM So far, Putin seems to be showing a lot of restraint. Giving Ukraine and their Western masters every opportunity to come to their senses. 2 2 3
thaibeachlovers Posted Thursday at 07:56 PM Posted Thursday at 07:56 PM 4 hours ago, jas007 said: So far, Putin seems to be showing a lot of restraint. Giving Ukraine and their Western masters every opportunity to come to their senses. I expected the destination to be Kiev, so it's more a message than a serious attack.
connda Posted Friday at 04:57 AM Author Posted Friday at 04:57 AM 13 hours ago, jas007 said: So far, Putin seems to be showing a lot of restraint. Giving Ukraine and their Western masters every opportunity to come to their senses. 8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: I expected the destination to be Kiev, so it's more a message than a serious attack. Russian is walking the escalation ladder in a measured manner. I imagine that hitting Kiev is another couple of steps up the escalator. The next response if the US/UK/France insists on continuing to launch their missiles (Ukraine is not launching them) will probably be a demonstration of more powerful conventional warheads. If the West keeps pushing, then Russia hits Kiev and destroys the governmental infrastructure. This de-escalates by the West standing down on the missile launches. Not sure they will do that. And for all the pro-war fan-boys urging the US/UK/France on - if this sh*t continues we all die. You morons can't grasp that. 1 3 1 1
Hanaguma Posted Friday at 05:11 AM Posted Friday at 05:11 AM Absolute fvcking idiocy. There arent enough of the missiles to do anything but be irritating. But...they CAN be used to escalate the war, to be an excuse for ever more bloodshed. Whoever is running the US government is now bordering on criminal by doing this. President Biden forbade it for more than a year, yet suddenly now it is permitted? Utter stupidity, and an obvious attempt to sabotage the incoming Trump administration. 1 3 1
jas007 Posted Friday at 05:44 AM Posted Friday at 05:44 AM (edited) 47 minutes ago, connda said: This de-escalates by the West standing down on the missile launches. Not sure they will do that. And for all the pro-war fan-boys urging the US/UK/France on - if this sh*t continues we all die. You morons can't grasp that. At this point, it certainly doesn't appear as though there will be any movement towards standing down on the missile launches, especially by France and the UK. The US is definitely involved as well, but their involvement may well have a political component - sabotaging Trump. So that's some hope. If Putin continues his patience, and if Trump makes it into office, then I can see a deal happening that would end the hostilities. I'm not sure the US wants to annihilate humanity just because of an Eastern European squabble over Russia's border and NATO membership for Ukraine. As for all the "pro-war fanboys"? The rank and file of that group have been well and truly brainwashed by years of Western propaganda. And they don't comprehend the results of a nuclear war. They think Russia and Putin are evil. And they're being told that Putin is "bluffing." Or, what's worse, the entire situation is not even part of what's reported as news. Edited Friday at 05:49 AM by jas007 To finish the post 1 1 1 1
3NUMBAS Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The new icbm did little damage as you can’t aim em at anything on the move ,expensive and brutal
0james0 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 11/21/2024 at 8:51 PM, connda said: ICBM ICBM’s have never hurt anyone!
0james0 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 11/21/2024 at 8:51 PM, connda said: Anyone want to revisit my poll about a nuclear war starting before the end of 2024? No- it’s not going to happen this year or next. Please relax and enjoy your life.
NoDisplayName Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 11/22/2024 at 12:44 PM, jas007 said: especially by France and the UK They aren't worried. Targets would be tank factories in Germany, and staging depots for wonder waffles in Poland.
NoDisplayName Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, 3NUMBAS said: The new icbm did little damage as you can’t aim em at anything on the move ,expensive and brutal Tank factories, weapons depots, hydrothermal plants, ports, airstrips, bunkers, railyards,..............these are not particularly mobile. 1
3NUMBAS Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago Experimental expensive missile not in production yet no good for ships
Yagoda Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago On 11/22/2024 at 11:57 AM, connda said: Russian is walking the escalation ladder in a measured manner. I imagine that hitting Kiev is another couple of steps up the escalator. The next response if the US/UK/France insists on continuing to launch their missiles (Ukraine is not launching them) will probably be a demonstration of more powerful conventional warheads. If the West keeps pushing, then Russia hits Kiev and destroys the governmental infrastructure. This de-escalates by the West standing down on the missile launches. Not sure they will do that. And for all the pro-war fan-boys urging the US/UK/France on - if this sh*t continues we all die. You morons can't grasp that. Joe Bidens payback to America for electing Trump
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now