Far-right activists from Germany spent US election day at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago

[RayC]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Why lose the chance to educate others. I started the topic, its there, lets see how smart you Socialist apologists a

 

You can "educate" others by answering a direct question directly rather than by evasion. 

 

I'll report the question for the ease of reference: "How does the concept of 'Volkesgemeinschaft' explain the relationship between Socialism and National Socialism?'

[Yagoda]

5 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

You can "educate" others by answering a direct question directly rather than by evasion. 

 

I'll report the question for the ease of reference: "How does the concept of 'Volkesgemeinschaft' explain the relationship between Socialism and National Socialism?'

Well that can be answered only if you understand what socialism is. Got that issue ready for you

[RayC]

29 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well that can be answered only if you understand what socialism is. Got that issue ready for you

 

I'm comfortable debating the history and philosophy of socialism, so I don't need a primer from you although I appreciate the offer.

 

What I would like is for you to justify your proposition that the concept of 'volksgemienshaft' explains how 'National Socialism' derived from 'Socialism': I have lost count of the number of times I have asked you to elaborate on your premise, but nothing has been forthcoming from you other than tangential rhetoric.

 

You know what? Call me cynical but I'm beginning to think that you don't have an answer to my question.

 

There is, of course, an easy way to dispell my doubts: Answer the question directly No evasion, no equivocation, no new thread, no tangential discussion, etc. Just an answer which directly addresses the question. 

 

Btw: It's perfectly ok to change your mind if, with hindsight, you no longer believe in your original proposition. Simply say so and that will be the end of it.

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

I'm comfortable debating the history and philosophy of socialism, so I don't need a primer from you although I appreciate the offer.

 

What I would like is for you to justify your proposition that the concept of 'volksgemienshaft' explains how 'National Socialism' derived from 'Socialism': I have lost count of the number of times I have asked you to elaborate on your premise, but nothing has been forthcoming from you other than tangential rhetoric.

 

You know what? Call me cynical but I'm beginning to think that you don't have an answer to my question.

 

There is, of course, an easy way to dispell my doubts: Answer the question directly No evasion, no equivocation, no new thread, no tangential discussion, etc. Just an answer which directly addresses the question. 

 

Btw: It's perfectly ok to change your mind if, with hindsight, you no longer believe in your original proposition. Simply say so and that will be the end of it.

Sorry pal, Im not burying an important debate in an different topic.

 

Still no reponses LOL...cluck cluck cluck

[RayC]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Sorry pal, Im not burying an important debate in an different topic.

 

Still no reponses LOL...cluck cluck cluck

 

Your response is risible.

 

Whether Germany is the primary source of Socialist thought is debatable. What is not debatable is that your latest missive is yet another statement which has no bearing on your original proposition i.e. National Socialism evolved from Socialism or your subsequent ridiculous attempt to 'justify' that statement by banding around the word, "volksgemienshaft".

 

No more confirmation is now required.  You clearly have absolutely no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the concept of socialism as a political philosophy.

 

To steal @Simple1's comment, "I really cannot be bothered any further. Play your games with someone else".

 

I'll pre-empt your response: I'm not conceding the field to you. It's simply impossible to have a reasoned discussion with someone who is unable to justify their position using a rational argument. 

 

Have a nice day.

[Yagoda]

6 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Your response is risible.

 

Whether Germany is the primary source of Socialist thought is debatable. What is not debatable is that your latest missive is yet another statement which has no bearing on your original proposition i.e. National Socialism evolved from Socialism or your subsequent ridiculous attempt to 'justify' that statement by banding around the word, "volksgemienshaft".

 

No more confirmation is now required.  You clearly have absolutely no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the concept of socialism as a political philosophy.

 

To steal @Simple1's comment, "I really cannot be bothered any further. Play your games with someone else".

 

I'll pre-empt your response: I'm not conceding the field to you. It's simply impossible to have a reasoned discussion with someone who is unable to justify their position using a rational argument. 

 

Have a nice day.

Translation: I join my fellows with white feathers

[RayC]

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Translation: I join my fellows with white feathers

 

Cowardice? Not guilty.

Stupidity? Guilty.

 

What possessed me to (continually) talk to a human brick wall and expect a coherent answer?🤦

[George FmplesdaCosteedback]

This sounds more like Hard Left propaganda. Anything now that is vaguely patriotic, or simply does not follow the "liberal" woke codes is portrayed as racist and far right There is no center, or conservative leaning it is just branded as evil, when in fact the National Party in 1930s Germany was "Socialist" by name and many of its policies.

[Lacessit]

On 12/7/2024 at 4:54 PM, impulse said:

I'd suggest staying well hydrated so shedding all those liberal tears doesn't cause a urinary tract infection.

 

 

AFAIK a cranial laxative has not been developed yet. I'll let you know when it does, so you can be first in line.