Jump to content

Judge Rejects Trump’s Immunity Claim in Hush Money Case, Conviction Stands


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Again, you and facts appear to be merely nodding acquaintances. The bull<deleted> lie was Harris lost in a landslide. The facts are the felon barely squeeked by.

 

1.5% is NOT a landslide. Try to keep up.

 

When you folks can't behave like adults and deal honestly with the truth, no one can take you seriously.

The winners  ,The WH, 7 out of 7 swing states , popular vote,  2130 counties, down ballot house , down ballot senate  , majority 6 gop on the Scotus!


The forever losers showing, a defeatist speech!

Your side’s showing ,20 million in the hole after blowing 1.5 billion!

The landslide is a mudslide!

The Abc network  lost in a embarrassing interview, 15 million to a Trump charity and GS had to pay out 1 m and a  apology !

 

Stayed tuned more winning to come.

 

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Some idiot claimed Harris lost in a landslide. Not true.

 

The only idiot here is the one he doesn't see she lost the election by a landslide 32% of the electoral vote.

The popular vote doesn't determine the election result

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

This "judge" hit rock bottom  and is trying to dig his way out.

 

We need full forensic investigations into Merchan and family members to make sure all was on the up and up. That nobody was making $$ by bringing this case, and that every other company that was alleged to have aimed high when looking for a loan that was paid back in full decades ago were charged 34 felonies or at least like for like.

 

Persecuting Trump on ginned up charges coodinated with the white house would IMO warrant the death penalty for all involved. We should not be copying Venezuela or NK justice system no matter how much we fear our team losing in an election.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Persecuting Trump on ginned up charges coodinated with the white house would IMO warrant the death penalty for all involved.

What a pathetic and sad comment!

I suggest YOU go and get a life before calling for the death of others!

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What a pathetic and sad comment!

I suggest YOU go and get a life before calling for the death of others!

We just need to make sure that every case is treated equally without prejudice or favor. After all, the 2 mantras that were rammed down my throat

Nobody is above the law, and

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear

Should mean we are ALL in fzvour of working out why Trump is the only American alive to have expired misdemeanors brought back to life on steroids and charged as 34 felonies at such a critical time.

 

Just can't understand why big democrats can inflate their property values and Bragg doesnt go after them  like

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/jon-stewart-fraud-donald-trump-b2520072.html

But Trump does and its crime of the century.

 

Investigations must be done for all our sakes, and if these people really did destroy democracy to "get Trump" like they campaigned on, then firing up ole sparky is certainly on the cards as a warning to others that might allow personal hatred to cause such damage to judicisl systems.

 

Perhaps I can offer a mantra for the left to consider.

If you take a shot at the king, you'd better not miss🤣

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
2 hours ago, riclag said:

The winners  ,The WH, 7 out of 7 swing states , popular vote,  2130 counties, down ballot house , down ballot senate  , majority 6 gop on the Scotus!


The forever losers showing, a defeatist speech!

Your side’s showing ,20 million in the hole after blowing 1.5 billion!

The landslide is a mudslide!

The Abc network  lost in a embarrassing interview, 15 million to a Trump charity and GS had to pay out 1 m and a  apology !

 

Stayed tuned more winning to come.

 

 

 

It’s the crowing over your own narrative that immediately paints you as MAGA. There’s no gray. There’s no middle. There’s no compromise. That’s what’s so frightening about you lot. And that’s why you get constantly compared to a cult. 
Everyone has failings. Everyone makes bad decisions but your lot see no fault in Trump and the continued identity politics you always play. 
“Your side” like it’s a football team or some other tribal following. “Your side” is your fellow Americans. People who disagree with the most egregious of what Trump says are constantly hearing that it’s going to be ok like he’s Jesus. Complete blind and utter devotion to one man rarely works out. That’s what everyone is telling you with the facts that keep getting presented to all MAGA’s but ultimately you all just follow the cult of personality and revert to sides. My side won. That’s all that matters. 
It’s why we think you’re blinded. 
 

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

 

The only idiot here is the one he doesn't see she lost the election by a landslide 32% of the electoral vote.

The popular vote doesn't determine the election result

Yeah but it does determine what people think. Trump may have won but it was no landslide and as usual, he and the GOP benefited massively from the Electoral College. Again. 
An example of a landslide would have been all of you lots wet dream, Ronald Reagan. 
Trump won by 1.5% of the vote. Some 2 million Americans. In any other democracy it gets him a split government at best. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
12 hours ago, johnnybangkok said:

It’s the crowing over your own narrative that immediately paints you as MAGA. There’s no gray. There’s no middle. There’s no compromise. That’s what’s so frightening about you lot. And that’s why you get constantly compared to a cult. 
Everyone has failings. Everyone makes bad decisions but your lot see no fault in Trump and the continued identity politics you always play. 
“Your side” like it’s a football team or some other tribal following. “Your side” is your fellow Americans. People who disagree with the most egregious of what Trump says are constantly hearing that it’s going to be ok like he’s Jesus. Complete blind and utter devotion to one man rarely works out. That’s what everyone is telling you with the facts that keep getting presented to all MAGA’s but ultimately you all just follow the cult of personality and revert to sides. My side won. That’s all that matters. 
It’s why we think you’re blinded. 
 

The msnbc is strong in you .

 

 

No state or federal judge can push aside the decisions of the SCOTUS!

 

Thats exactly whats going on in this case! 
 

My cult  likes make America great again as opposed to make open borders great , the allowing of millions of unvetted  immigrants from over hundred  countries  , I detest DEI policy Supporters  such as BLACK LIVES MATTER , Pro Hamas Marxist propaganda towards the west  ,idea of oppressed and colonialism and its burn it all down mentality!

 

I like Tradition ,not guys dressing up as ladies and pronouns while woke politicians so deranged try to implement federal funds for their sex change!

 

I love my make america great again cult as opposed to you’re Woke cult.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Please explain how the actions of a presidential candidate can be seen as actions from a president acting in his official capacity.

Your part of the non citizens crowd that thinks Trump isn’t deserving of the rights 

of Past Presidents!

Merchan rule doesn’t supersede the SCOTUS.

 

SCOTUS decisions aren’t negotiable!

SCOTUS DECISIONS ARE final!

See you in court!

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted

In an unapproved source, I read from Dershowitz that one of the judge's motives is the New York law that doesn't allow appeals until after the sentencing.  So Trump has to wait until 2029 to even appeal the case.

 

He described it as "clever but wrong" if anyone wants to Google it...

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, riclag said:

Merchan was handpicked for this case as opposed to being randomly selected.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/know-juan-merchan-judge-trump-indictment-case-rcna77611


Merchan donated to Biden.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/18/judge-juan-merchan-trump-trial-political-contributions

 

State bar in NY said contributions  arent appropriate,experts call this bias, he shouldn’t even be the presiding judge!

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/17/nyregion/trump-trial-judge-merchan-donations.html

 

Merchan contributed to a group 

to stop the gop & Trump.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/18/judge-juan-merchan-trump-trial-political-contributions

 

Merchan’s daughter is a Dem organizer  , raised millions  against Trump and the Gop.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/

 

 

Cnn  law expert Elie Honig , case targeted to Trump and couldn’t succeed outside the anti Trump

district in NY said , Honig, who discloses he is a friend and former colleague of Bragg, wrote: "It's over now; Bragg's case will never reach a conclusion, and Trump is headed back to the White House. He's not getting sentenced now or in 2029. The DA has done enough damage. It's time to let it go."

https://www.newsweek.com/alvin-bragg-poisoned-well-every-donald-trump-trial-elie-honig-1990606

 

 

 

And now Merchan is defying the SCOTUS !

Enter the new administration Jan 20 ,25 . 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And  how is he defying the SCOTUS? Explain your thinking on that 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, impulse said:

In an unapproved source, I read from Dershowitz that one of the judge's motives is the New York law that doesn't allow appeals until after the sentencing.  So Trump has to wait until 2029 to even appeal the case.

 

He described it as "clever but wrong" if anyone wants to Google it...

 

So if he had sentenced Trump before the election, you would not have complained about it as election interference?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, riclag said:

Your part of the non citizens crowd that thinks Trump isn’t deserving of the rights 

of Past Presidents!

Merchan rule doesn’t supersede the SCOTUS.

 

SCOTUS decisions aren’t negotiable!

SCOTUS DECISIONS ARE final!

See you in court!

 

 

 

So nothing on this.

"explain how the actions of a presidential candidate can be seen as actions from a president acting in his official capacity.".

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...