Starmer Defends Decision to Deny Compensation for Waspi Women Amid Backlash

[Seppius]

Kudos's to Diane Abbot (never thought I would say that)

 

 

 

Hard to argue with anything in this link

 

https://brexitbites.quora.com/Labour-s-Broken-Promises

[JonnyF]

Rayner was telling porkies as well.

 

What a surprise.

 

Seems they are all liars. 

 

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

3 hours ago, roquefort said:

Oh, so they can tell all the bare-faced lies they want as long as they're not in the manifesto?

What a bizarre view of political integrity.

Odd logic.

[herfiehandbag]

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s only a U-Turn if it’s a retreat from a Manifesto pledge or a policy that is announced while in Government.

 

It’s not a U-Turn.

Fornicate with my ancient military footwear - you really are struggling on this one aren't you Chomper!

[scottiejohn]

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s only a U-Turn if it’s a retreat from a Manifesto pledge or a policy that is announced while in Government.

Who says, apart from you?

[scottiejohn]

5 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

He will be gone within 12 months.

Let us hope so along with R from accounts!

[Chomper Higgot]

40 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Fornicate with my ancient military footwear - you really are struggling on this one aren't you Chomper!

Not at all.

 

That so many here are unaware (perhaps deliberately so) that Governments are elected to deliver their manifesto is something of a surprise.

 

But then the UK is nation I which people choose to stop working before they reach their retirement age and then expect t to be compensated when it turns out they got their math wrong.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

21 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Who says, apart from you?

Governments stand for election on the basis of their manifesto.

 

It’s why, for example, the House of Lords doesn’t get to prevent legislation that is in the Government’s manifesto, it’s what the electorate voted for.

 

You might recall the Salisbury convention from back when you were learning how your Government functions.

 

 

[scottiejohn]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Governments stand for election on the basis of their manifesto.

 

It’s why, for example, the House of Lords doesn’t get to prevent legislation that is in the Government’s manifesto, it’s what the electorate voted for.

 

You might recall the Salisbury convention from back when you were learning how your Government functions.

 

 

I suggest that you try answering questions without pointless waffle!

[PETERTHEEATER]

2 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

 

It cannot be long before any Pro-Labour agendas are put to the side.

 

Here is Rachel from Customer Complaints

 

 

 

A Labour Minster by the name of Tulip Siddiqi and her family, are currently under investigation for their part in £4 Billion worth of bribes related to a Nuclear Power Plant.

 

Clear and transparent Keir will get to the bottom of it and it will be move along, nothing to see here.

Oooh! 🤭

[mokwit]

7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s only a U-Turn if it’s a retreat from a Manifesto pledge or a policy that is announced while in Government.

 

It’s not a U-Turn.

Rubbish. It is disgusting dishonesty. Starmer, Rayner Reeves and Cooper were all saying they would support it as a way of projecting an image of themselves as politicians and their party. Footage of them actually with the campaigners so that their support was widely disseminated. Just more evidence of them saying anything to try and garner popularity when in opposition. Same with taking care of pensioners and then cutting the winter fuel allowance, or are you going to tell me nobody will be affected if they are only paying it via a payment to those eligible for pension credits.

 

The problem with these people is that there are too many things that weren't in the manifesto and should have been.

 

These people are without a moral compass, but then that is the problem with the Left.

[mokwit]

31 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not at all.

 

That so many here are unaware (perhaps deliberately so) that Governments are elected to deliver their manifesto is something of a surprise.

 

But then the UK is nation I which people choose to stop working before they reach their retirement age and then expect t to be compensated when it turns out they got their math wrong.

 

 

Where was it in the Blair Government manifesto that they were going to open the floodgates to mass immigration and top down enforced multiculturalism?. A Labour manifesto means NOTHING.

[The Cyclist]

2 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Where was it in the Blair Government manifesto that they were going to open the floodgates to mass immigration and top down enforced multiculturalism?. A Labour manifesto means NOTHING.

 

Manifesto's are worthless. Hence there is currently a push to make them legally binding.

 

Now that would be worth voting for.

[mokwit]

2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Manifesto's are worthless. Hence there is currently a push to make them legally binding.

 

Now that would be worth voting for.

Agree. They are not supposed to be deliberate deception to get elected and then get down to what they really had planned.

[mokwit]

12 hours ago, Social Media said:

Starmer acknowledged the frustrations of women affected by changes to their retirement age but maintained that meeting their demands would not be financially viable.

GBP 22bn for Millibrand to siphon off amongst his cronies is though, along with other multibillion gifts.

[mokwit]

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

No wonder the BBC are refusing to play it. Doesn't really sit well with their Pro-Labour agenda. 😃

 

https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1990410/bbc-christmas-slammed-gb-news-Patrick-Christys

 

There is no reason not to play this other than totalitarian political control.

[mokwit]

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What was in the Manifesto on which Labour were elected?

 

 

Lies and omissions, clearly.