Transparency - the day that AI changed American politics forever.

[Dan O]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:58 AM, Airalee said:

No more of this….

 

 

Its unfortunate that you post a sound bite from a long interview and its taken out of the complete context of the interview and discussion. Typical GOP tactic to twist info for a hidden agenda. Post the whole interview if you wont to be taken seriously, 

[bubblegum]

So, that went well in the house 

[Airalee]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

Its unfortunate that you post a sound bite from a long interview and its taken out of the complete context of the interview and discussion. Typical GOP tactic to twist info for a hidden agenda. Post the whole interview if you wont to be taken seriously, 

It’s unfortunate that you are so dishonest.  It was part of a big steaming pile of word salad.  How you can support bills being passed without it being a legal requirement for them to actually be read by the congress members is disgusting.  Shame on you.

 

 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:55 AM, theblether said:

One of the provisions was a vast increase in pay for Congress as well as enhanced health benefits. X users cracked

It seems you believes what the X owner tweeted (or Xed or whatever).

Maybe check your facts before you believe that guy - or anybody else.

 

As far as I am concerned AI makes people only stupider. They "think" they can rely on AI - they can't.

There was also a time when people thought if it was printed it was true - a long time ago.

[OneMoreFarang]

It's somehow funny that people think Musk and Trump will work in the interest of ordinary people.

What gives you that idea?

[Dan O]

35 minutes ago, Airalee said:

It’s unfortunate that you are so dishonest.  It was part of a big steaming pile of word salad.  How you can support bills being passed without it being a legal requirement for them to actually be read by the congress members is disgusting.  Shame on you.

 

 

 

You go watch and listen to the whole interview , Not the You Tube edited version, and what was posted earlier was completely out of the context of the whole conversation that happened. 1 sentence extracted does not make it a fact. Twisting information is what makes many have no credibility in any way as they shortcut thinking for sound bites to appear like they are intelligent. 

 

I like how you want to blame me for the rules of congress not requiring bills to be read in their entirety. No where did I say that the bills shouldnt be read completely or that the bills were even good ones. But dont post crap and act like you know what your talking about. I guessing you dont even know that the bills are not even written by the actually elected officials in either house but their assistants, legal aides and office aides. 

[Lacessit]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:58 AM, theblether said:

And I note the Democrats new attack line, describing Musk as "President Musk." They are enraged that he has brought upon them the one thing they could not afford to lose - the end of their grip on the news narrative. 

 

$44 billion for Twitter was cheap. And Grok AI alone ( part of Twitter ) has already changed the political narrative. 

$400 million for the Presidency was even cheaper.

[rwilem]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:58 AM, Airalee said:

No more of this….

 

 

You would hope, but no.

[rwilem]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:58 AM, Airalee said:

No more of this….

 

 

You would hope, but no.

[rwilem]

On 12/19/2024 at 10:58 AM, Airalee said:

No more of this….

 

 

Excuse the duplicate posts, some issues with that.

Can add, from a GOP staffer, “It’s silly to pretend this is just a skinny CR,” one GOP staffer told said. “It’s a three-month spending bill with ornaments hanging all over it.”

[Lacessit]

On 12/19/2024 at 1:52 PM, theblether said:

 

Do you subscribe to Politico? The difference here is that the more controversial aspects of the bill were exposed to a worldwide audience in minutes. 

Is it not strange when AI does this it is being applauded, when Assange did it the establishment screamed bloody murder?

[theblether]

5 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Is it not strange when AI does this it is being applauded, when Assange did it the establishment screamed bloody murder?

 

Assange directly undermined national security. I didn't have a strong opinion on his fate as I could see why people supported him. 

 

Equally government officials should be free to have internal discussions without fear of exposure. A prime example was the Enigma decoder. 

 

Would Assange have told the Germans that the Allies had cracked the code? 

[Lacessit]

26 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

Assange directly undermined national security. I didn't have a strong opinion on his fate as I could see why people supported him. 

 

Equally government officials should be free to have internal discussions without fear of exposure. A prime example was the Enigma decoder. 

 

Would Assange have told the Germans that the Allies had cracked the code? 

I have seen enough criminal activity in so-called respected companies I have worked for, to know people take shortcuts and break the law, either for money or advancement.

 

I don't know what it is like in other countries. Being a whistleblower in Australia is certain to bring down the wrath of the establishment, quite apart from being a career killer.

 

Assange is a villain because he makes government machinations visible. Zuckerberg is a business hero that sells the personal information Facebook harvests to the highest bidder, including hackers and foreign countries. Go figure.