Jump to content

Tourist Arrested in Fatal Jet Ski Incident at Phuket Beach


Recommended Posts

Posted

According to the earlier report the accident happened in the dark. Would be important information to establish if the jetski rider could see the swimmer.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, stevenl said:

According to the earlier report the accident happened in the dark. Would be important information to establish if the jetski rider could see the swimmer.

Certainly not dark in the CCTV still above although the quoted time of death at the time he was found would suggest it was a lot later.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

Scratches and paint damage on a rented jet-ski is not real evidence... but hey.. TiT

Sure it does, if the vehicle was in good shape when it was rented out and returned damaged. That would be clearly documented by photos before and after as most rental joints take photos.

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

These jetskis bounce up and down a lot, and can hit even small waves with force. So not unthinkable he thought he hit a wave.

Hard to imagine that he didn’t see the swimmer at least at the last moment, high visibility in an open field riding a jet ski beside it was obviously a hard hit and normally after hitting something one would go and inspect the object they hit…

IMG_6997.jpeg.e9a27e0d3f63f72fd1fe3fb030c76f70.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, stevenl said:

What Aussie?

 

These jetskis bounce up and down a lot, and can hit even small waves with force. So not unthinkable he thought he hit a wave.

I’ve driven jet skis a lot and you’ll definitely know it if you hit a person.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, impulse said:

If that's the actual photo, I doubt that was cause by a collision with a swimmer.  And I see quite a bit of Bondo, indicating previous damage.

Don’t know what picture you looked at but I don’t see any bondo.

  • Confused 1
Posted

I watched the video and it looks like the guy on the jet ski was trying to maneuver to avoid the swimmer. They changed him with wrongful death of another person. I read some of the comments here and it’s always the same nonsense of faulting the Thai people. Well no Thai person was involved in the accident so blame the cops for jumping to conclusions. If a Thai person was involved in the accident then you would blame them and their so called lack of education. The cops here did their job, traced the culprit and nabbed him.  Someone was killed, try not to forget that.

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Scratches and paint damage on a rented jet-ski is not real evidence... but hey.. TiT

 

If there was more than one jet ski on CCTV (there were at least 2 according to the OP), and the only criteria they used to determine which one hit the swimmer was "damage", I think they have, at best, a 50:50 chance of having the right guy.  Even lower if there were several jet skis out at the time.

 

If witnesses and/or CCTV could differentiate between the riders, so be it.  Good on the police for getting the guy.  But it needs to be based on something other than damage shown in that photo.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
15 hours ago, khunJam said:

No it’s not. You want it to be to find blame on some Thais instead of the white perpetrator

 

I want them to base their accusation on something the beside dock rash in that photo, and get the right guy. 

 

I've hit submerged and floating objects on a jet ski and never had damage like the photo, especially so far above the water line.

 

BTW, what do you call that 3mm thick white layer below the peeling black paint?   We call it Bondo.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
21 hours ago, khunJam said:

I watched the video and it looks like the guy on the jet ski was trying to maneuver to avoid the swimmer. They changed him with wrongful death of another person. I read some of the comments here and it’s always the same nonsense of faulting the Thai people. Well no Thai person was involved in the accident so blame the cops for jumping to conclusions. If a Thai person was involved in the accident then you would blame them and their so called lack of education. The cops here did their job, traced the culprit and nabbed him.  Someone was killed, try not to forget that.

Did anyone blame a Rhai  you seem obsessed with protecting Thais  even when no need to

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I want them to base their accusation on something the beside dock rash in that photo, and get the right guy. 

 

I've hit submerged and floating objects on a jet ski and never had damage like the photo, especially so far above the water line.

 

BTW, what do you call that 3mm thick white layer below the peeling black paint?   We call it Bondo.

 

You in no way you know whether or not if that is bondo, you’re just playing detective pretending to see things that the police somehow missed and you are making an swing assumption that the entire case relies on that piece of evidence. You don’t know all of what evidence that has been gathered. For all we know the police probably have surveillance video of him from the incident back to the hotel. The police don’t immediately necessarily show all the evidence to the media or the perpetrator, they will give the perp the chance to confess then if he doesn’t they cook him with the evidence.

  • Confused 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

Did anyone blame a Rhai  you seem obsessed with protecting Thais  even when no need to

Yeah well that makes no sense, try again.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, khunJam said:

You in no way you know whether or not if that is bondo, you’re just playing detective pretending to see things that the police somehow missed and you are making an swing assumption that the entire case relies on that piece of evidence. You don’t know all of what evidence that has been gathered. For all we know the police probably have surveillance video of him from the incident back to the hotel. The police don’t immediately necessarily show all the evidence to the media or the perpetrator, they will give the perp the chance to confess then if he doesn’t they cook him with the evidence.

 

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck and swims like a duck, that's probably a picture of a duck.

 

Duck2.jpg.444eca42a8ebbcbc279710a0cdae1ff7.jpg

 

It's the same with pictures of Bondo.

 

Bondo2.jpg.01788541f02dfcf977099adaa0fa7fcc.jpg

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, khunJam said:

Yeah well that makes no sense, try again.

Pedantic so and so... now, counter my comment.

Posted
On 12/21/2024 at 10:16 AM, john donson said:

safety swimming zone?

 

not victim blaming

 

but as I know of thai jet ski maffia scammers, would never rent one

 

I made the same point asking about 'swimming zones' and accountability of those swimming in open water outside of swimming zones and was immediately accused of victim-blaming by a virtue-signaller. 

 

 

Someone swimming in open water not so easy to see, this could have been any vessel striking the swimmer. 

Its a tragic death, but I'm not sure the guy on the Jet-Ski should be or can be held accountable unless they'd strayed into a portioned off designated swimming only area. 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...