On 12/20/2024 at 2:03 PM, Social Media said:

In September 2022, armed officers from Police Scotland raided Edward’s residence, seizing an alarming cache of weapons that included a crossbow, machetes, a tomahawk, a samurai sword, knuckledusters, an extendable baton, a stun gun, and a variety of knives—some adorned with Nazi and SS insignia. Additional items recovered included an air pistol, a skull mask resembling SS regalia, goggles, a respirator, hardened-knuckle gloves, and hunting tips for crossbow arrows. Prosecutors referred to the collection as an “armoury,” an intimidating, if not impressive, Halloween costume collection.

 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

It's a shame they can't be so thorough and motivated for potential attacks from the cultural enrichers.

 

But i guess that would be racist or [chooseaword]phobic. 

I could even tell them which building the weapons are apparently stored in if being told to drop them off there is a clue.

This T0sser should really stop playing Dungeons and Dragons and put away his Game of Thrones DVDs.

5 minutes ago, mokwit said:

I could even tell them which building the weapons are apparently stored in if being told to drop them off there is a clue.

 

Yep. Muslims are advised by the police to hide the weapons in the mosque. 

 

Non Muslims get 10 years for possession.

 

2 tier Britain.

 

 

1 hour ago, mokwit said:

The rise of Nazism according to Chomper.

 

It started with the terms of the Armistice and the Wiemar Republic.

 

I suggest you educate yourself beyond the 'as seen on TV' version if you are going to comment. There are some French made documentaries on youtube which seem to try and describe what happened in fairly neutral terms.

 

Who are these uniformed jackbooted street thugs?

 

I’ll be delighted to educate myself on the terms within the Armistice Agreement that required Germany to establish a Nazi Party, if you can be so kind as to provide the specific clauses of the Armistice I’ll gladly read them.

 

If you can also provide the Armistice terms that required the formation of a Nazi Party in the United States, those too will be added to my self education reading list.

 

Thank goodness he couldn't get his hands on guns.

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

It's a shame they can't be so thorough and motivated for potential attacks from the cultural enrichers.

 

But i guess that would be racist or [chooseaword]phobic. 

 

'Whataboutery' as a defence for a neo-Nazi.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ll be delighted to educate myself on the terms within the Armistice Agreement that required Germany to establish a Nazi Party, if you can be so kind as to provide the specific clauses of the Armistice I’ll gladly read them.

 

If you can also provide the Armistice terms that required the formation of a Nazi Party in the United States, those too will be added to my self education reading list.

 

You are being ridiculously pedantic to the point of childishness. Once again you are using the tactic of demanding that I accept an artificially narrow definition that suits your agenda. The terms of the Armistice created the backdrop against which the Nazi party could achieve traction. I suggest you read up on the chaos in Germany in 1918 and onwards into the 1920's and the economic and political conditions in the Wiemar Republic.

 

The earliest of Hitlers speeches I can find online is 1921. I suggest you read that to educate yourself as to the backdrop.

 

As for the US Nazi party, in the 1930's Germany was admired for having pulled itself out of the depression that still continued in other countries including the US (hint: it helps if you take control of your central bank). Quite possibly there was an element of antisemitism driving this also - a feeling that Americans were losing control to Jewish interests, This was the period in which Henry Ford wrote The International Jew. Antisemitism was not invented by Hitler, it was present in many countries before the war, and after.

31 minutes ago, mokwit said:

You are being ridiculously pedantic to the point of childishness. Once again you are using the tactic of demanding that I accept an artificially narrow definition that suits your agenda. The terms of the Armistice created the backdrop against which the Nazi party could achieve traction. I suggest you read up on the chaos in Germany in 1918 and onwards into the 1920's and the economic and political conditions in the Wiemar Republic.

 

The earliest of Hitlers speeches I can find online is 1921. I suggest you read that to educate yourself as to the backdrop.

 

As for the US Nazi party, in the 1930's Germany was admired for having pulled itself out of the depression that still continued in other countries including the US (hint: it helps if you take control of your central bank). Quite possibly there was an element of antisemitism driving this also - a feeling that Americans were losing control to Jewish interests, This was the period in which Henry Ford wrote The International Jew. Antisemitism was not invented by Hitler, it was present in many countries before the war, and after.

Henry Ford, he of the Dearborn Independent?!

 

 

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Henry afire, he of the Dearborn Independent?!

That too, but I couldn't remember the name and couldn't be bothered to look it up for an answer to you as you never argue your points, only deflect and insult. I would have thought mentioning his book by name pretty much covered that base.

 

You'll have to explain the ''afire' reference to me.

 

Now, your deflection aside, what about my points? In the absence of comment/counter from you I will assume you accept them as accurate.

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

It's a shame they can't be so thorough and motivated for potential attacks from the cultural enrichers.

 

But i guess that would be racist or [chooseaword]phobic. 

its got me beat why....

i am phobic islam.

i fear islam.

islam is bigot me,

12 minutes ago, mokwit said:

That too, but I couldn't remember the name and couldn't be bothered to look it up for an answer to you as you never argue your points, only deflect and insult. I would have thought mentioning his book by name pretty much covered that base.

 

You'll have to explain the ''afire' reference to me.

 

Now, your deflection aside, what about my points? In the absence of comment/counter from you I will assume you accept them as accurate.

It was a typo Mokwit.

 

Your choice to cite Henry Ford, an antisemite, was obviously a choice.

 

I’m still waiting for these clauses in the Armistice Agreement that required Germany to establish a Nazi Party, following your suggestions, I’m keen to educate myself on the matter.

 

 

 

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It was a typo Mokwit.

 

Your choice to cite Henry Ford, an antisemite, was obviously a choice.

 

I’m still waiting for these clauses in the Armistice Agreement that required Germany to establish a Nazi Party, following your suggestions, I’m keen to educate myself on the matter.

 

 

 

I have already answered that but you are using the tactic of demanding that i accept a very narrow definition that suits your purpose just as you did with U Turn and Manifesto in another thread.

 

The board can judge for itself as to whether the rise of the Nazis was a function of conditions in Germany post 1918 in part caused by the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, or whether as you suggest, if there was not a specific clause in the treaty of Versailles calling for the formation of the Nazi party the rise of the Nazis cannot be blamed on the terms of the Treaty (see how ridiculous you sound?, and everyone on the board can see it).

 

As for citing Henry Ford, I deliberately chose that example to illustrate that anti Jewish views were not confined to Germany and seemingly actually fairly mainstream (was Henry Ford regarded as an extremist at the time?). In the UK, antisemitism seemingly started with Edward I.

 

I think I threw it out but Bernard Baruchs autobiography has a photo of him with Henry Ford who he describes in the book as a good friend. Baruch as you know, was pivotal in the formation of Israel post WW2. Whether the friendship in the 20's ended with Ford's views in the 30's I don't know.

On 12/21/2024 at 9:27 AM, john donson said:

10 years and did actually nothing at all, just words

 

keyboard warrior like many here

So what would you have prefered, the police waiting until he actually killed some people first? Their job is to prevent crime, which is exactly what they did.

23 hours ago, RayC said:

 

'Whataboutery' as a defence for a neo-Nazi.

 

Where did I defend him?

 

Oh that's right, I didn't. 😆

24 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Where did I defend him?

 

Oh that's right, I didn't. 😆

 

Then what was the point of your whataboutery? If you support the prosecution of this neo-Nazi why not simply say so rather than voicing your grievance about a completely unrelated matter?

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

Then what was the point of your whataboutery? If you support the prosecution of this neo-Nazi why not simply say so rather than voicing your grievance about a completely unrelated matter?

 

The point was very clear in the original post.

 

If you are not sure, please re-read it. 

 

In the meantime, quit with the strawman nonsense. 

21 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

The point was very clear in the original post.

 

If you are not sure, please re-read it. 

 

In the meantime, quit with the strawman nonsense. 

 

Strawman😂

 

Carry on with the 'whataboutery' and misplaced victimhood and I'll continue to call it out.

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

Strawman😂

 

Carry on with the 'whataboutery' and misplaced victimhood and I'll continue to call it out.

 

Yes, strawman. You claimed I defended the guy. 

 

I did not. 

 

Keep making false claims and I will keep calling them out.