Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, petermik said:

After many weeks Greater Manchester Police and the CPS have charged two Asian men with assault following a well reported incident in July at Manchester Airport in which a female Police officer suffered a vicious assault resulting in a broken nose....no police officer is being charged with any criminal offence relating to their actions in response to apprending the individuals....:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:


Ah, so the investigation is complete (made more difficult because of the complaints over the police use of force when one of them stamped on the head of one of the accused) and now charges are being pressed and the police complaint dismissed.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c627e37v21eo

Pretty much that is how the justice system works and is supposed to work, all good.

Where's @JonnyF??

Posted
Just now, Bkk Brian said:

These Muslim thugs broke the nose of a policewoman and assaulted other officers at the airport all captured on cctv. I hope they reap the sword of justice.

 

 

I hope your wish comes true..........................why do I feel skeptical about the success of that?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

News released on Friday afternoon  just before the two week Christmas holiday 

And reported in the main stream media (which was, supposedly, biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people).

Did you have a point?

Posted
2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

And reported in the main stream media (which was, supposedly, biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people).

Did you have a point?

 

  It is rather inappropriate  to call them "brown people" in this day and age . 

   Try to think of some other word to describe the people whom you want to describe 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  It is rather inappropriate  to call them "brown people" in this day and age . 

   Try to think of some other word to describe the people whom you want to describe 


Ok, so you completely missed my main point - instead nitpicking over nomenclature. Never mind, I can't be bothered.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Ok, so you completely missed my main point - instead nitpicking over nomenclature. Never mind, I can't be bothered.

 

   I don't want to sit and talk online about "brown people" , so either think of a better descriptive word or go and talk to someone else about "brown people"  .

   Its a rude and derogatory term 

Posted
14 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

And reported in the main stream media (which was, supposedly, biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people).

Did you have a point?

If you're going to make claims about other members supposedly making claims that the press is biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people, then its quite ironic that you yourself then make a very derogatory term to group all ethnic groups under "brown people". Some of those would be very offended by that.

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

If you're going to make claims about other members supposedly making claims that the press is biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people, then its quite ironic that you yourself then make a very derogatory term to group all ethnic groups under "brown people". Some of those would be very offended by that.


Really, you're offended by it? I am just saying what the people who make these claims are too scared to say - they use dehumanising terms like "immigrants" when we all know they mean "brown people" as white immigrants don't seem to bother them.

I also find it amusing that the right wing are so easily triggered by hurty words.

  • Confused 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Really, you're offended by it? I am just saying what the people who make these claims are too scared to say - they use dehumanising terms like "immigrants" when we all know they mean "brown people" as white immigrants don't seem to bother them.

I also find it amusing that the right wing are so easily triggered by hurty words.

Read my post again and point out where I said I was offended by it? Let alone triggered by hurty words?

 

Then point out where I ever claimed to be right wing? Not that this should matter whether I was or not. Are you stereotyping right wing people now? Do all left wingers refer to a multitude of ethnic groups as "brown people" even when some of them are white and others would certainly not class themselves as brown?

 

You are sounding very racist to me.

 

Not doing well here are you.

Posted
8 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Really, you're offended by it? I am just saying what the people who make these claims are too scared to say - they use dehumanising terms like "immigrants" when we all know they mean "brown people" as white immigrants don't seem to bother them.

I also find it amusing that the right wing are so easily triggered by hurty words.

 

  Just because you are a Lefty, that doesn't mean that you get a free pass to racially abuse people .

   You don't get a free pass to speak  deperogarily about a group of people .

   BTW , the White E.U immigrants did seem to bother them  , that's why they voted for Brexit . 

  Departed from the E.U and joined Asian Countries , so. stop your race baiting 

  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

And reported in the main stream media (which was, supposedly, biased and told not to report bad stuff from brown people).

Did you have a point?

 

   Yes, my point was that there could well have been public protests about the decision whether to prosecute the Police or not and to stop any public protests , they released to news on the Friday before the holidays 

  • Agree 1
Posted

The Manchester police should have prosecuted immediately the CCTV evidence was shown. It is clear that the alleged perpetrators had brown skin, although the colour of skin makes no difference. A poster above may have alluded that the reason for them not being charged so soon, may have been skin colour. I tend to agree.

 

Now, in the UK, people with brown skin are immigrants, or descended from immigrants. British people are white skinned. So are many European immigrants. 

 

Many, or most, brown skinned immigrants are from a different religion than the main religion in the UK. White skinned immigrants are not. These are facts. Not racist beliefs (before any lefties chime in).

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, soi3eddie said:

The Manchester police should have prosecuted immediately the CCTV evidence was shown. It is clear that the alleged perpetrators had brown skin, although the colour of skin makes no difference. A poster above may have alluded that the reason for them not being charged so soon, may have been skin colour. I tend to agree.

 

Now, in the UK, people with brown skin are immigrants, or descended from immigrants. British people are white skinned. So are many European immigrants. 

 

Many, or most, brown skinned immigrants are from a different religion than the main religion in the UK. White skinned immigrants are not. These are facts. Not racist beliefs (before any lefties chime in).

 


Sigh. 

My point was that the posters such as @JonnyF who have refused to participate in this thread (wonder why?) have polluted numerous threads saying these people are not being charged because they are Muslim/brown and "two tier Kier" blah blah blah whilst white Southport rioters were charged. Apples and oranges.

It was explained to them many times that the case was under investigation and was complicated by the fact there were complaints against the police of excessive force as there is CCTV of an officer stamping on one of the offenders heads. The fact is the investigation is now complete, the police have been cleared and charges have been filed against the Muslim people which @JonnyF and others said would never happen because the police force and UK justice is biased against white people.

I'm sure they'll be along soon to apologise and acknowledge they were wrong. Any minute.

Posted
1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:


Sigh. 

My point was that the posters such as @JonnyF who have refused to participate in this thread (wonder why?) have polluted numerous threads saying these people are not being charged because they are Muslim/brown and "two tier Kier" blah blah blah whilst white Southport rioters were charged. Apples and oranges.

It was explained to them many times that the case was under investigation and was complicated by the fact there were complaints against the police of excessive force as there is CCTV of an officer stamping on one of the offenders heads. The fact is the investigation is now complete, the police have been cleared and charges have been filed against the Muslim people which @JonnyF and others said would never happen because the police force and UK justice is biased against white people.

I'm sure they'll be along soon to apologise and acknowledge they were wrong. Any minute.

 

   Give jonnyf a break , he hasn't been online since this thread was posted ,

  This thread was posted 5 hours ago and he hasn't been online here for 8 hours .

    He could be doing other things at the moment 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Give jonnyf a break , he hasn't been online since this thread was posted ,

  This thread was posted 5 hours ago and he hasn't been online here for 8 hours .

    He could be doing other things at the moment 


Fair enough. I look forward to his return. (Never thought I'd say that)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...