Jump to content

IRA Bomb Survivor Urges Gerry Adams to Reveal the Truth


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Jonathan Ganesh, a survivor of the 1996 IRA bombing in London's docklands, has called on Gerry Adams, the former president of Sinn Féin, to provide clarity about his alleged involvement with the IRA. The attack claimed the lives of two people and injured many others, including Ganesh, who was working as a security guard while pursuing law studies.

 

image.png

 

Ganesh is among three individuals pursuing a civil case against Adams, seeking symbolic damages of £1 for "vindicatory purposes." The other plaintiffs are John Clark, a survivor of the Old Bailey bombing in 1973, and Barry Laycock, injured in the Manchester IRA bombing of 1996. Adams, who has consistently denied membership in the IRA, is expected to testify in his defense during a High Court hearing set for 2026.

 

Speaking to BBC Radio Ulster’s Good Morning Ulster, Ganesh described the decision to initiate legal action as difficult but necessary. "It wasn't an easy decision to make," he said, "but we believe it was the right decision. It might be the last opportunity that victims of IRA terrorism have."

 

When asked about his expectations from Adams during the court proceedings, Ganesh was unequivocal: "Just tell us the truth. Were you in the IRA or not in the IRA?" He emphasized the importance of accountability, stating, "We must have some sort of closure for the victims. The Troubles in Northern Ireland have left an awful legacy."

 

Ganesh acknowledged that their civil case would not lead to criminal repercussions. "We appreciate they are not going to put anyone in prison," he noted. However, he expressed hope that Adams could provide answers due to his vocal support for the IRA during the conflict. "Because Mr. Adams was so vocal with his support for the IRA, we do believe he may be able to give us some answers. We just need to get that closure."

 

Reflecting on the bombing's impact, Ganesh described the enduring pain it caused. "The injuries I suffered in the bomb have had a terrible impact on my life. I think it will always be there. It will always haunt me," he said. Yet, he considers himself fortunate to have survived. "I describe myself as one of the lucky ones," he added.

 

Despite the physical and emotional scars, Ganesh revealed that he has chosen to forgive those responsible for the attack. "I have forgiven the people that hurt me and my two friends who were killed because forgiveness allows me to move forward with my life," he explained. Nonetheless, he maintained the necessity of accountability. "There must be some accountability," he insisted.

 

Ganesh also underscored the importance of the Northern Ireland peace process, noting its success while highlighting unresolved issues. "The peace process has worked and we support that… but there is something left that we have to resolve," he concluded.

 

For Ganesh and the other plaintiffs, the pursuit of truth and accountability remains an essential step toward healing the wounds left by decades of violence.

 

Based on a report by BBC 2024-12-23

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Posted

Gerry Adams, a justifiably proud Irish Republican has consistently denied being a member of the IRA or having any involvement in IRA activities.

 

The police and security services have never produced any evidence to contradict Adams statements on the matter and has endured death threats to himself and his family for having done so.

 

He is a far too rare example of a man willing to engage in diplomacy to end a war. 


Ganesh and his joint plaintiffs have the wrong man.

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, jippytum said:

Gerry Adams is a liar and a murderer. He denied his involvement in the IRA. and betrayed hls own comrades  to further his  political career.

 Watch the 2024 movie 'say nothing ' 

Your evidence is a drama!

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 5
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, jippytum said:

History is the proof


Adams playing a part in the ending of the conflict is the history, it’s backed by

documents and records rather than a drama.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Adams playing a part in the ending of the conflict is the history, it’s backed by

documents and records rather than a drama.

 

 

 Unlike some IRA  supporters people wishing to attone  help make truefull  movies about Adams without fear of legal repicusions because the contents are truthful. They do so to expose this killer. 

 

 watch the 2024 movie

SAY NOTHING

 

 

People with blood ontheir 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, jippytum said:

People with blood ontheir 

Sorry i lost connection. 

People who wish to atone help make movies to expose Adams. 

they do do without legal repucussions because the contents are factual. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, wombat said:

as produced by the fantasy factory?

As produced by the ex IRA London bombers testimony

 

 

 

Posted

What still has me mystified was I was watching a documentary and this Irish bloke  from Northern Ireland talking with a Irish accent saying "I'm British not Irish "

 

Could of fooled me talking with a Irish accent!

 

Anyway why do you want to be known as British ?. Especially if you have a Irish accent 

 

Hardly anything to be proud of is it 

,If I had a choice I would rather be Irish 

 

As soon as they get that Union jack off the Australian flag and replace it with a Rainbow flag all the better !

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Much hope of getting details out of Adams as a truth out of Starmer

Or sense out of Chomper!

"Gerry Adams, a justifiably proud Irish Republican has consistently denied being a member of the IRA or having any involvement in IRA activities.

 

 

 

The police and security services have never produced any evidence to contradict Adams statements on the matter and has endured death threats to himself and his family for having done so.

 

 

 

He is a far too rare example of a man willing to engage in diplomacy to end a war. "

 

The real question of course, is was he a tout?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...