Jump to content

Nigel Farage Offers to Bridge UK Relations with Trump Administration


Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

A bit of self promotion by soothing the petulant child. It's unfortunate that there is a world wide absence of good, decent, pragmatic politicians, in fact it's downright dangerous.

 

My thoughts straight off.....self-promotion, stay in the lime light, only bad publicity is no publicity, trying to gain political credence......God I hope they tell him where to go.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

My thoughts straight off.....self-promotion, stay in the lime light, only bad publicity is no publicity, trying to gain political credence......God I hope they tell him where to go.

I thought Lord Mandelson started this with asking Farage first?

 

 

Mandelson seeks Farage 'help' with Trump and 'not over' for Fury

The Daily Telegraph highlights an unexpected collaboration. It says that Lord Mandelson - the UK's new ambassador to the US - is set to work with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to help him win over the incoming Trump administration. The paper says it will be part of efforts to persuade Trump not to "go to war with Britain on tariffs". The article also says that the move is opposed by some senior Labour figures, who think it might "elevate" the right wing cause.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cre735grx8lo

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

You can't trust the msm headlines..........

 

the UK's new ambassador to the US - is set to work with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage

 

 

Sources say new ambassador ready to engage with Reform UK leader

 

Lord Mandelson is set to call on

 

told The Telegraph that he would be “happy” to act as a link to Mr Trump and Mr Musk for Lord Mandelson if it helped the UK’s national interest.

So another one to add to the list for you, don't trust the BBC. Noted

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Can I just point out that Mandelson is not the new US Embassador, until the thumbs up is given by the Trump administration.

 

Normal protocol is to have this cleared prior to making the announcement. Whether, in this case,  this has been done or not, I have no idea.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

Can I just point out that Mandelson is not the new US Embassador, until the thumbs up is given by the Trump administration.

 

Normal protocol is to have this cleared prior to making the announcement. Whether, in this case,  this has been done or not, I have no idea.

 

The UK is entitled to announce he has been appointed by the UK government.

 

Acceptance by the US is a separate procedure. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

The UK is entitled to announce he has been appointed by the UK government.

 

Acceptance by the US is a separate procedure. 

 

As I said, the normal protocol is to....

Posted
1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

 

As I said, the normal protocol is to....

 

No.

 

The UK government makes its appointments and announces it.

 

The country to which an ambassador is hoping to be appointed, then goes through its own acceptance procedures.

 

Two separate and distinct steps.

 

The UK gov doesn't secretly tell the US who it is going to appoint (although they could if they wished to do so) and then waits to see what the US says......I guess this way it puts subtle 'pressure' on the US administration to accept and not be seen to be mealy mouthed about it.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yep, plenty of topics on it already why don't you go to one of them.

 

No I just wasn't 100% sure you meant the BBC and not me.

Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

No.

 

The UK government makes its appointments and announces it.

 

 

This is not normally announced until the appointment has been cleared by the US side.

 

A protocol that goes back decades.

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

This is not normally announced until the appointment has been cleared by the US side.

 

A protocol that goes back decades.

Agreement (Exequatur): After the UK announces the appointment, the receiving country (in this case, the U.S.) must formally accept the individual. This is called the exequatur process, which involves the host country granting the ambassador official approval to serve.

 

Apparently....through quiet diplomatic channels.......the US should have already been given the nod as to who it is going to be......and maybe accepts unofficially.

 

Maybe the US said no.....and the UK is playing political games announcing it this way.

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Apparently....through quiet diplomatic channels.......the US should have already been given the nod as to who it is going to be......and maybe accepts unofficially.

 

Which is what I said right at the start.

 

In this case, with the change in administration in the US, I don't knowif this has happened, especially with some some of Trumps team openly calling Mandelson a moron.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Which is what I said right at the start.

 

In this case, with the change in administration in the US, I don't knowif this has happened, especially with some some of Trumps team openly calling Mandelson a moron.

 

 

 

Yes...Will Biden quickly accept to annoy Trump?.....which would seem rather childish.

 

Will Biden delay, leaving Trump with an awkward decision to make? Rather childish

 

Or maybe Trump will push Biden to make a decision now ....yes or no..... 

 

Or will Trump persuade Biden to say what Trump would like to say .....yes or no....leaving him clear to do whatever??

  • Haha 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Which is what I said right at the start.

 

In this case, with the change in administration in the US, I don't knowif this has happened, especially with some some of Trumps team openly calling Mandelson a moron.

 

 

 

That is just the usual projection by an administration teeming with utter morons - beginning with exhibit A at the top.

Posted
3 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Good grief, Farage really is desperate to be relevant.  I pity his poor constituents in Clacton, although maybe they're grateful that he's not spending time there!

 

I don't pity the dopes - they elected him.

  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Tiger1980 said:

Like Nigel Farage or not, he is still the only British politician that is respected by the majority of the population. 

The population of where????

Most people I know think he is a loud mouthed, self serving, grifting buffoon who is only out for himself.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 162

      Gulf of America.

    2. 0

      Chinese Tourist Dies in Jet Ski Collision on Patong Beach

    3. 22

      How did you do it ?

    4. 2

      Bucket list gone wrong: Swansea gran’s naked Bangkok escapade

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...