Jump to content

Who wants to Deny that Joe Biden was a Corrupt Liar?


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 hours ago, Andre0720 said:

Thanks. You prove my point.

All that you describe is about hating Trump, while, so it appears, you know nothing about his politics.

TRUMP IS EXACTLY WHAT IS NEEDED NOW IN THE US.

And this is why the American public, who you admit are not dumb, have chosen him to fix the mess left by the Biden administration. Starting by fixing the border and the immigration mess created by Biden. (This is politics by the way, if you are able to distinguish between the individual and his politics.)

 

 

 

Trump did solve the border problem last time, despite all the hot air. The US border and immigration problems have been there for decades.

 

Relations around the world, where the US has interests and needs the co-operation of other countries, whether you like it or not, took a huge tumble under his administration.

 

The man is a lunatic and unfit for office.

 

His next trick will be to try for office again for a third term, he's already made overtures regarding this.

 

He is the biggest liar the US voting population has ever been stupid enough to elect.

 

Examples below:-

 

Border wall construction

Talking about his wall on the border with Mexico, Trump said, “I completed what I said I was going to do, much more than I said I was going to do.”

Facts Fist: This is false; Trump didn’t achieve nearly as much wall construction as he had pledged on the campaign trail in 2015 and 2016. 

Trump repeatedly said in 2015 and 2016 that “we need” 1,000 miles of wall to protect the southern border, with another 1,000 miles already protected by natural barriers. But not even close to 1,000 miles were built during his presidency; official federal statistics put the total construction at 458 miles, and only 52 miles of that total was new “primary” wall built where no barriers had previously existed. When Trump left office, there were about 280 miles of the border where wall construction had been planned but not executed.

 

 

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/11/nx-s1-5070566/trump-news-conference

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/04/politics/fact-check-trump-time-magazine/index.html

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-versus-truth-most-outrageous-falsehoods-his-presidency-n1252580

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Scouse123 said:

 

Trump did solve the border problem last time, despite all the hot air. The US border and immigration problems have been there for decades.

 

Relations around the world, where the US has interests and needs the co-operation of other countries, whether you like it or not, took a huge tumble under his administration.

 

The man is a lunatic and unfit for office.

 

His next trick will be to try for office again for a third term, he's already made overtures regarding this.

 

He is the biggest liar the US voting population has ever been stupid enough to elect.

 

Examples below:-

 

Border wall construction

Talking about his wall on the border with Mexico, Trump said, “I completed what I said I was going to do, much more than I said I was going to do.”

Facts Fist: This is false; Trump didn’t achieve nearly as much wall construction as he had pledged on the campaign trail in 2015 and 2016. 

Trump repeatedly said in 2015 and 2016 that “we need” 1,000 miles of wall to protect the southern border, with another 1,000 miles already protected by natural barriers. But not even close to 1,000 miles were built during his presidency; official federal statistics put the total construction at 458 miles, and only 52 miles of that total was new “primary” wall built where no barriers had previously existed. When Trump left office, there were about 280 miles of the border where wall construction had been planned but not executed.

 

 

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/11/nx-s1-5070566/trump-news-conference

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/04/politics/fact-check-trump-time-magazine/index.html

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-versus-truth-most-outrageous-falsehoods-his-presidency-n1252580

 

 

 

Already posted a reply that is also relevant to your comment. I was basically saying that lying is part of politics. Focusing on lies is just a waste of time and energy.

 

Well, might very well be so. (All liars)

And perhaps also by definition.

Anyone who is in a position of defending a position of some kind, or attacking the position of someone else, will end up using lies to do so.

But the main issue would be the actions of such individuals, in between the lies, does it create a positive or negative outcome for the country.

This is where it gets interesting. So many people who claim to hate Trump, when asked why as it relates to the political outcomes, have difficulty answering.

And those siding with Biden, one would wonder which good outcomes they are looking at...

 

And regarding outcomes, I always keep in mind that the 'right' is 'right'. Which for me is the lesser of the two evils...

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The medias role in Government ignores 

its intended purpose in a Constitutional Republic , holding them accountable!

 

Corporate media failed its purpose to hold the Bidens & his sycophant supporters  responsible!

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 12/29/2024 at 3:21 AM, Will B Good said:

 

 

I will....but I could be lying......but truthfully....does anyone really care anymore about lies v the truth......so passe.

I KNEW this was coming. After 8 years of all manner of false claims, withch hunts and smears about DJT and(non existent) corruption, 'cuz its so important everyone is held to account..

 

We get a MAJOR narrative shift, to oh well its old news now. Hilarious😂🤣😅 and nope, were going to investigate the bidens until we know what was done in return for the 10s of millions the dishonest left moved heaven and earth to deny.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Republicans tried and tried to find any evidence of any corrupt transactions. They repeatedly failed.  Couldn't even get enough votes for an impeachment. As evidence, that photo would be laughed out of court.

Why would that photo be left out of court as evidence? By the way, tell us what you know about the Rules of Evidence in federal court. Would Joe's lies about knowing or meeting his son's Partners be admissible?

 

I assume you feel the same way about Trump's impeachments right?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Why would that photo be left out of court as evidence? By the way, tell us what you know about the Rules of Evidence in federal court. Would Joe's lies about knowing or meeting his son's Partners be admissible?

 

I assume you feel the same way about Trump's impeachments right?

If you could establish that a criminal act had occurred, then that photo might count as evidence against Biden as showing intent. Republicans tried and failed to turn up any criminal activity.

Whereas with Trump, there is actually written evidence authorized by Trump that showed he lied to cover up his possession of highly classified documents.

Posted
6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

If you could establish that a criminal act had occurred, then that photo might count as evidence against Biden as showing intent. Republicans tried and failed to turn up any criminal activity.

Whereas with Trump, there is actually written evidence authorized by Trump that showed he lied to cover up his possession of highly classified documents.

OH..the documents. Like the ones Joe had, too bad he was too non compos mentis to prosecute. Although he made a great nominee.

 

Glad to see you are already backing off. So you are contending, in front of us all, that if all the evidence against Joe Biden was presented to a Grand Jury , there would not be an indictment?

 Surely you are not that uneducated?

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

OH..the documents. Like the ones Joe had, too bad he was too non compos mentis to prosecute. Although he made a great nominee.

 

Glad to see you are already backing off. So you are contending, in front of us all, that if all the evidence against Joe Biden was presented to a Grand Jury , there would not be an indictment?

 Surely you are not that uneducated?

For a case to be presented to al grand jury, there has to be sufficient evidence to show that a crime has been committed. Try as they might, the Republcans could uncover no evidence of no actual crime being committed by Biden.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Joe....one of the most mentally ill politicians of our time. A true psychopath. If slavery still existed I'm sure him and Hunter would own a bunch. 

 

That's why they had to go underground.

 

And naming your son Hunter....there's a clue!!!!

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You clearly arent from the USA. Any 1st year arraignment DA is a night court could get an indictment against Joe based on the publicly acknowledged facts, which you ignore.  Ill start a Topic.

Yes, doubtless, in local jurisdictions that the case. But the Justice Dept is not some enforcement agency from Podunk. Any person from the USA should know that.  In light of that, it seems dubious that you are an American. Not that it matters. Ignorance is a phenomenon independent of borders.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
20 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I KNEW this was coming. After 8 years of all manner of false claims, withch hunts and smears about DJT and(non existent) corruption, 'cuz its so important everyone is held to account..

 

We get a MAJOR narrative shift, to oh well its old news now. Hilarious😂🤣😅 and nope, were going to investigate the bidens until we know what was done in return for the 10s of millions the dishonest left moved heaven and earth to deny.

 

False claims.....sexual assault and how many felonies?

 

False was stop the steal and Jim Jordan wasting two years to produce no evidence and refusing to allow HB to appear in public sessions.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Exactly. The Justice Department under Biden is a tool of his admin. There is more justice in Podunk. But, you wouldnt know how things work in the USA.

 

You would oppose a Grand Jury then investigating the Bidens?

 

 

Jim Jordan did a cracking job.....couldn't understand why he refused the Dem's demand that Biden should be impeached.

  • Agree 2
Posted

Give it a rest. Trump will be President as of Jan. 20, 2025. Fixating on Biden serves no purpose. It's as stupid as those who fixated on Clinton, then Bush and then Obama after their respective terms ended. It's just a cheap excuse to  avoid the  current situation.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Exactly. The Justice Department under Biden is a tool of his admin. There is more justice in Podunk. But, you wouldnt know how things work in the USA.

 

You would oppose a Grand Jury then investigating the Bidens?

Before a grand jury gets involved, the Justice Dept has to decide if there's enough evidence to present to one. If you were an American you would know this.

Posted
19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Before a grand jury gets involved, the Justice Dept has to decide if there's enough evidence to present to one. If you were an American you would know this.

Yeah they sure did a great job in the Hunter Biden cases LOL.

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Give it a rest. Trump will be President as of Jan. 20, 2025. Fixating on Biden serves no purpose. It's as stupid as those who fixated on Clinton, then Bush and then Obama after their respective terms ended. It's just a cheap excuse to  avoid the  current situation.

When the enemy of humanity is on the ropes, keep beating him. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You clearly arent from the USA. Any 1st year arraignment DA is a night court could get an indictment against Joe based on the publicly acknowledged facts, which you ignore.  Ill start a Topic.


He’s embarrassed to reveal what country he is from.

 

Or is it his country is embarrassed to have him as a citizen.

 

I say both.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Before a grand jury gets involved, the Justice Dept has to decide if there's enough evidence to present to one. If you were an American you would know this.


You certainly are not.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

On the basis of the familiarity with the American system of justice, I certainly have a better claim to be an American than you do. Of course, it may be that you equate being an American with being ignorant about how the American government functions.. By that metric, you certainly qualify with flying colors. 

 


You’re nothing but the laughing stock of the forum.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...