Jump to content

Congratulations Canada = Buh Bye Trudeau


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Trump takes his 1st scalp. Love it! Bet Trudeau isn't laughing at him any more.

Trump had nothing to do with it...  Trudeau was well on his way out before the American election.

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nid_Noi said:

It seems that many people have no clue about the Canadian parliamentary system.

Trudeau did not resign, he INTENDS to resign.

So he is still leader of the Liberal Party and the PM. The Liberals have 90 days to start the process of choosing (elect) a new leader. They can drag their feet.

Also Trudeau asked the Liberal Governor-General to prorogue the Parliament until the 24th of March which means their is no dissolution possible or motion to censure the government. The parliament is « frozen ».

So Trudeau stays with his full functions as liberal leader, PM without the risk of being censored. His decision postponing any possibility of elections gives many Members of Parliament full pensions they would not have received if the government had been censored in January after the holidays break.

Like Biden is doing since November 5, 2024 this delay gives Trudeau plenty of time to cushion his exit and help his liberal buddies.

If re-elected by his constituents in the Papineau riding he may come back in politics.

Don’t trust the Canadian electorate, the next opposition party may be the socialist NDP which has been gaining seats in federal and provincial elections.

 

You have quite the vivid imagination for conspiracies and plots.

Please familiarize yourself with the rules of Canadian Parliament and the  rules that apply to Non Confidence motions. Non Confidence motions that result in  a required resignation of government are only  allowed as per the rules set out in the Standing Orders respecting Supply periods. There are three Supply periods with the next one scheduled March 24. This is why the Parliament is prorogued until March 24.  The Supply period is  when funds are approved for the government.  In plain language the MPs cannot vote  a binding  nonconfidence motion until the next Supply Period date of March 24., so  Mr. Trudeau could have remained in office until then. Any non confidence motion  proposed before then  would not make it to the order  docket because it would have no legal status.

 

The PM remaining in place until March 24, ensures that the government has a functioning executive branch of  government until that time. Extending the recess period is not unusual and is for the best as the parliament was  crippled by the disruptive polemics of Poilievere.

 

The NDP will be blown out next election.

The MPS who would qualify for pensions  have already done so or will qualify by 25 Feb. as is the case for Jagmeet Singh leader of the NDP. He would have still qualified for his pension even if an election was called next month as  elections must be held within 37 to 51 days of the call.

 

There is nothing wrong in allowing an orderly transition of leadership for a major political party. This was done for the Conservatives when they dumped Harper in favour of the mindless  Scheer.

 

Chaos and  disorder  do not serve the best interests of stability.  There will be an election April or May 2025. No one wants an election in the middle of the winter or in rainy March/April.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Nid_Noi said:

One of my friends (a big donor to the hospital foundation) died in the hallway on a stretcher waiting for a room. He had been for 7 hours in the hallway without seeing a doctor. It’s a nurse who closed his eyes while walking by to go to the washroom.

A new inquiry is taking place about the MAID program (Medical Assistance In Dying). Most candidates would be people who have been severely injured by the mRNA jabs.

Not knowing the circumstances of the death  leaves many holes in the story. 

Your false claim about mRNA  vaccinations makes clear that you are fabricating this story. 

If you want to promote fasle claims about vaccinations take it to the thread for the mentally ill who share their imagined plots of diabolical vaccines.

 

Health care is a provincial  mandate. it is not the federal government's mandate or within its power to manage.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Im sure it's like a real life fairy tale up there, but Trudeau DID freeze bank accounts of poor people supporting the trucker protest. Turns out the truckers and supporters were right to not want to be forced to inject muck. He was an effeminate fascist. Good riddance.

You´re a Trump Groupie and call Trudeau a Fascist......hold my Beer:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 hours ago, save the frogs said:

canadians have more cushy lives than most people in most other countries.

 

it's one of the most efficient countries with a good economy and healthcare. 

 

it's all fake news that trudeau sucks. 

 

IMG_1310.thumb.jpeg.e68f0527ddcd452d21b1ddc435cf0cec.jpeg

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, nightfox said:

Canada is a broken country thanks to this man and it's government. Worst current housing crises in the world, inflation up the roof, record high unemployment, etc.... Thank you for all the for all your work Trudeau.

What you’re describing can be attributed to a phenomenon that Wikipedia describes as a USA right wing catch phrase!

I can’t imagine the left wing agreeing to 

the phenomenon that so fittingly was and is, detrimental to their loosing  political control in North America .

 

” go woke , go broke “

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_woke,_go_broke

 

Posted
11 hours ago, save the frogs said:

canadians have more cushy lives than most people in most other countries.

 

it's one of the most efficient countries with a good economy and healthcare. 

 

it's all fake news that trudeau sucks. 

 

 

Are you a frog, like Trudeau???

Posted
14 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You have quite the vivid imagination for conspiracies and plots.

Please familiarize yourself with the rules of Canadian Parliament and the  rules that apply to Non Confidence motions. Non Confidence motions that result in  a required resignation of government are only  allowed as per the rules set out in the Standing Orders respecting Supply periods. There are three Supply periods with the next one scheduled March 24. This is why the Parliament is prorogued until March 24.  The Supply period is  when funds are approved for the government.  In plain language the MPs cannot vote  a binding  nonconfidence motion until the next Supply Period date of March 24., so  Mr. Trudeau could have remained in office until then. Any non confidence motion  proposed before then  would not make it to the order  docket because it would have no legal status.

 

The PM remaining in place until March 24, ensures that the government has a functioning executive branch of  government until that time. Extending the recess period is not unusual and is for the best as the parliament was  crippled by the disruptive polemics of Poilievere.

 

The NDP will be blown out next election.

The MPS who would qualify for pensions  have already done so or will qualify by 25 Feb. as is the case for Jagmeet Singh leader of the NDP. He would have still qualified for his pension even if an election was called next month as  elections must be held within 37 to 51 days of the call.

 

There is nothing wrong in allowing an orderly transition of leadership for a major political party. This was done for the Conservatives when they dumped Harper in favour of the mindless  Scheer.

 

Chaos and  disorder  do not serve the best interests of stability.  There will be an election April or May 2025. No one wants an election in the middle of the winter or in rainy March/April.

You are just confirming the facts I mentioned. Time is the essence. Do you think that politicians are concerned about the welfare of the citizens? Backbenchers do not give a damn about the orderly transition. You are just naive and dreaming in technicolor.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

If there was any world leader worse than Starmer it was this Big Jessie.His Mum was more of a man than him.

Congratulations Canada.

I would have thought being the offspring of his mom (when she wasn't doing Mick) and Fidel would have given him more cajones. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Voters should pay very close attention to a candidate's background to see if they are qualified for the job instead of treating an election as a popularity contest.  In Jr's case, obvious problems, a high school drama teacher isn't qualified for PM and his father started Taxania on the road to perdition at break neck speed.  Trudeau Sr being an obvious antisemitic was another huge issue and

bent over for Quebec.

Posted
3 hours ago, Cereal said:

Exactly!!!!

 

F Imam Trudeau. 

 

Remember Omar Khadr. Remember Trudeau saying terrorists can be assimilated back into society. 

 

He got elected with a CV that had one job on it: Part-time high school drama teacher

 

He got elected because he had nice hair and was going to legalize weed. 

 

He is a national embarrassment and will be remembered as the biggest most useless PM that has ever been elected. 

 

Imagine the PM of Canada being publicly and internationally humiliated by Trump as the Governor of the 51st State of the USA and having no comeback? 

 

He is a useless <deleted>. 

 

Good riddance. 

 

9 years at the helm. Doen't translate to being useless. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 

9 years at the helm. Doen't translate to being useless. 

 

You never heard of George W.Bush???  Or Tony Blair or General Prayut?

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 

9 years at the helm. Doen't translate to being useless. 

Often you are correct. But Canadians can be stupid and continue to support a useless Turdeau simply because they vote liberal, because their parents voted liberal, and their parents voted liberal......

 

But tell us, what did Imam Trudeau actually do?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cereal said:

Often you are correct. But Canadians can be stupid and continue to support a useless Turdeau simply because they vote liberal, because their parents voted liberal, and their parents voted liberal......

 

But tell us, what did Imam Trudeau actually do?

Perhaps you got a point. Sometimes voters can be stupid. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Obviously you have never used a Canadian hospital. The average waiting time in EMERGENCY in hospitals is from 6 to 14 hours, depending on the province. 


The economy is in decline, housing is unaffordable, idiotic carbon taxes are looming, the Canadian dollar is in freefall.  

Sounds like the BS they feed the Americans to justify their system. I have never had to wait at emergency went right in every time. In BC I had to wait about 10 minutes for a doctor to show up.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 1/7/2025 at 1:25 AM, save the frogs said:

canadians have more cushy lives than most people in most other countries.

 

it's one of the most efficient countries with a good economy and healthcare. 

 

it's all fake news that trudeau sucks. 

 

That's odd. His friends in the trans community assure me he does...

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

 

9 years at the helm. Doen't translate to being useless. 

The duration of rule for various tyrants and despots varies widely. Here are some notable examples along with their years in power:

1. **Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union)**: 1924 - 1953 (29 years)
2. **Adolf Hitler (Germany)**: 1933 - 1945 (12 years)
3. **Mao Zedong (China)**: 1949 - 1976 (27 years)
4. **Kim Il-sung (North Korea)**: 1948 - 1994 (46 years)
5. **Muammar Gaddafi (Libya)**: 1969 - 2011 (42 years)
6. **Robert Mugabe (Zimbabwe)**: 1980 - 2017 (37 years)
7. **Fidel Castro (Cuba)**: 1959 - 2008 (49 years)
8. **Bashar al-Assad (Syria)**: 2000 - present (as of 2023, 23 years)
9. **Benito Mussolini (Italy)**: 1922 - 1943 (21 years)
10. **Saddam Hussein (Iraq)**: 1979 - 2003 (24 years)

These figures illustrate the varying lengths of authoritarian rule across different countries and historical contexts.

 

All excellent people. Waaaay better than Turdeau for sure eh. They were leaders far longer so there's no way they could be useless, correct????

Posted
On 1/7/2025 at 12:44 AM, blazes said:

 

Are you a frog, like Trudeau???

Who uses such a rude and disgusting term? Obviously you are unaware that one of the founding people of the modern nation of Canada were the French.  If it wasn't for France, the USA would not have achieved its  independence in 1776.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Cereal said:

The duration of rule for various tyrants and despots varies widely. Here are some notable examples along with their years in power:

1. **Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union)**: 1924 - 1953 (29 years)
2. **Adolf Hitler (Germany)**: 1933 - 1945 (12 years)
3. **Mao Zedong (China)**: 1949 - 1976 (27 years)
4. **Kim Il-sung (North Korea)**: 1948 - 1994 (46 years)
5. **Muammar Gaddafi (Libya)**: 1969 - 2011 (42 years)
6. **Robert Mugabe (Zimbabwe)**: 1980 - 2017 (37 years)
7. **Fidel Castro (Cuba)**: 1959 - 2008 (49 years)
8. **Bashar al-Assad (Syria)**: 2000 - present (as of 2023, 23 years)
9. **Benito Mussolini (Italy)**: 1922 - 1943 (21 years)
10. **Saddam Hussein (Iraq)**: 1979 - 2003 (24 years)

These figures illustrate the varying lengths of authoritarian rule across different countries and historical contexts.

 

All excellent people. Waaaay better than Turdeau for sure eh. They were leaders far longer so there's no way they could be useless, correct????

You forgot Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933 to 1945 (12 years). Same number of years as Hitler, but better.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Cereal said:

The duration of rule for various tyrants and despots varies widely. Here are some notable examples along with their years in power:

1. **Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union)**: 1924 - 1953 (29 years)
2. **Adolf Hitler (Germany)**: 1933 - 1945 (12 years)
3. **Mao Zedong (China)**: 1949 - 1976 (27 years)
4. **Kim Il-sung (North Korea)**: 1948 - 1994 (46 years)
5. **Muammar Gaddafi (Libya)**: 1969 - 2011 (42 years)
6. **Robert Mugabe (Zimbabwe)**: 1980 - 2017 (37 years)
7. **Fidel Castro (Cuba)**: 1959 - 2008 (49 years)
8. **Bashar al-Assad (Syria)**: 2000 - present (as of 2023, 23 years)
9. **Benito Mussolini (Italy)**: 1922 - 1943 (21 years)
10. **Saddam Hussein (Iraq)**: 1979 - 2003 (24 years)

These figures illustrate the varying lengths of authoritarian rule across different countries and historical contexts.

 

All excellent people. Waaaay better than Turdeau for sure eh. They were leaders far longer so there's no way they could be useless, correct????

 

And yet the  Liberal government  obtained a national mandate as the result of 3  general elections. Apparently, you are not much one for  the electoral process.

 

You give a nice list of despots, but there are also many   leaders who have been in office through legitimate means. What's your point?

 

Margaret Thatcher - 11 3/4 years

Winston Churchill - 9 years

Franklin Roosevelt - 12 years

William Pitt the Yonger - 18 years

Wiliam Galdstone  - 12 1/3 years

George Washington - 16 years ; 8  years as military leader and defacto national leader  + 8 years as President 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

That's odd. His friends in the trans community assure me he does...

 

You betray your ignorance.

By any chance are you an elderly white male occupying a lower socio economic demographic? (i.e. low income, minimal education, without influence and power) 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You betray your ignorance.

By any chance are you an elderly white male occupying a lower socio economic demographic? (i.e. low income, minimal education, without influence and power) 

Sshhh. You'll offend the maga morons.

  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Who uses such a rude and disgusting term? Obviously you are unaware that one of the founding people of the modern nation of Canada were the French.  If it wasn't for France, the USA would not have achieved its  independence in 1776.

 

The joke's on you, Patty boy.  I merely queried whether "save the frogs" (as he calls himself) was indeed a frog, an acceptable slang idiom for the French in general and for Quebecers in particular.

 

As a British Columbian I can assure you that the vast majority of men in Western Canada refer to their Quebec brothers as frogs.  Full of noise and achieving nothing. Now or ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...