The Cyclist Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Patong2021 said: A large portion of the Pakistani population is under employed or on social benefits. And working as Taxi drivers on the side 1 hour ago, Patong2021 said: IMO it is to be expected when approx. 50% are incestuous family structures (1st cousin marriages). As is the associated medical conditions. Quote Children of south Asian heritage were overrepresented in the figures compared with the population of the Bradford district, according to the report, with 45 (65%) of the children being of south Asian background. Those of south Asian heritage comprise 37% of Bradford’s under-18 population. Thirty of the 69 deaths (43%) were categorised as chromosomal, genetic and congenital anomalies, conditions that are more common in families with parents who are related. That will get someone riled up and ranting about Right Wing Press / Media 😀😀 Unlucky https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/feb/15/cousin-marriages-cited-as-significant-factor-bradford-child-deaths 1
JonnyF Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Neeranam said: The UK's commitment to granting asylum is not a political choice but a humanitarian obligation based on international agreements, like the 1951 Refugee Convention. Do you oppose this? Those agreements were designed post war to protect people who had genuine threats to their life in the country they were fleeing. Not economic migrants who already made it to France but want to "flee" Calais to take advantage of a welfare state like Britain. 1 1
Andycoops Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Giving money to a international terrorist government is unforgivable. Sanctions should be applied and all visas cancelled and none issued until they the scum return the criminals. The UK doesn't need the terrorists in any way shape or form. They need to be teached a lesson in diplomacy and the rule of laws. Of course in the meantime they are a vassal state of china and the pooh bear communists 1 1
Neeranam Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, Andycoops said: Giving money to a international terrorist government is unforgivable. Sanctions should be applied and all visas cancelled and none issued until they the scum return the criminals. Who are you calling scum? 2
Neeranam Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 hours ago, JonnyF said: Those agreements were designed post war to protect people who had genuine threats to their life in the country they were fleeing. Not economic migrants who already made it to France but want to "flee" Calais to take advantage of a welfare state like Britain. The Refugee Convention does not require refugees to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter. It allows them to seek protection in a country of their choosing, often based on family ties, language, or historical connections. Many asylum seekers in Calais have family in the UK, speak English, or have ties to former British colonies. Wouldn’t you do the same if your family were in another country? Seeking asylum where you have support systems is logical and human. 1
Neeranam Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 5 hours ago, jippytum said: They do not renounce their Pakistani citizenship they maintain duel nationality even if born inhe UK Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf DID renounce their Pakistani citizenship.
JonnyF Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos. No wonder this former Labour MP was such a vocal critic of Musk. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14274139/Ex-Labour-MP-arrested-paedo-sting-sexual-communication-child.html
Chomper Higgot Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, JonnyF said: It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos. No wonder this former Labour MP was such a vocal critic of Musk. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14274139/Ex-Labour-MP-arrested-paedo-sting-sexual-communication-child.html “It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos.” Let’s not pretend that came from any rational thought process.
simon43 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago [quote] ... The Refugee Convention does not require refugees to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter. ... [/quote] Correct, but the vast majority of those coming to the UK are not refugees, fleeing from a war-torn country. They are economic migrants, and therefore the Refugee Convention does not apply. Since the fall of Assad, have all the so-called refugees from Syria left the UK and returned to help to rebuild their own country? I bet not!! 1
JonnyF Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Let’s not pretend that came from any rational thought process. You mean like former Labour MP's being arrested for being a Paedo? https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/former-labour-mp-arrested-during-paedophile-sting-months-after-suspended/
Purdey Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I suspect that Pakistan will not accept these criminals is that... they are criminals. Just a guess.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now