Labour must stop handing millions to Pakistan which blocks Return of Child Sex Offenders

[The Cyclist]

1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

A large portion of the Pakistani population is under employed or on social benefits.

 

And working as Taxi drivers on the side

 

1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

IMO it is to be expected when approx. 50% are incestuous family structures (1st cousin marriages).

 

As is the associated medical conditions.

 

Quote

Children of south Asian heritage were overrepresented in the figures compared with the population of the Bradford district, according to the report, with 45 (65%) of the children being of south Asian background. Those of south Asian heritage comprise 37% of Bradford’s under-18 population.

Thirty of the 69 deaths (43%) were categorised as chromosomal, genetic and congenital anomalies, conditions that are more common in families with parents who are related.

 

That will get someone riled up and ranting about Right Wing Press / Media 😀😀

 

Unlucky

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/feb/15/cousin-marriages-cited-as-significant-factor-bradford-child-deaths

[JonnyF]

39 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

The UK's commitment to granting asylum is not a political choice but a humanitarian obligation based on international agreements, like the 1951 Refugee Convention. Do you oppose this?

 

Those agreements were designed post war to protect people who had genuine threats to their life in the country they were fleeing.

 

Not economic migrants who already made it to France but want to "flee" Calais to take advantage of a welfare state like Britain. 

[Andycoops]

Giving money to a international terrorist government is unforgivable.

 

Sanctions should be applied and all visas cancelled and none issued until they the scum return the criminals.

 

The UK doesn't need the terrorists in any way shape or form.

 

They need to be teached a lesson in diplomacy and the rule of laws.

 

Of course in the meantime they are a vassal state of china and the pooh bear communists

[Neeranam]

3 hours ago, Andycoops said:

Giving money to a international terrorist government is unforgivable.

 

Sanctions should be applied and all visas cancelled and none issued until they the scum return the criminals.

Who are you calling scum?

  

[Neeranam]

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Those agreements were designed post war to protect people who had genuine threats to their life in the country they were fleeing.

 

Not economic migrants who already made it to France but want to "flee" Calais to take advantage of a welfare state like Britain. 

 

The Refugee Convention does not require refugees to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter. It allows them to seek protection in a country of their choosing, often based on family ties, language, or historical connections. Many asylum seekers in Calais have family in the UK, speak English, or have ties to former British colonies.

Wouldn’t you do the same if your family were in another country? Seeking asylum where you have support systems is logical and human.

[Neeranam]

5 hours ago, jippytum said:

They do not renounce their Pakistani citizenship they maintain duel nationality even if born inhe UK

  Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf DID renounce their Pakistani citizenship.

[JonnyF]

It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos.

 

No wonder this former Labour MP was such a vocal critic of Musk.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14274139/Ex-Labour-MP-arrested-paedo-sting-sexual-communication-child.html

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos.

 

No wonder this former Labour MP was such a vocal critic of Musk.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14274139/Ex-Labour-MP-arrested-paedo-sting-sexual-communication-child.html

 

 

“It's no surprise Labour consistently side with the Paedos.”
 

Let’s not pretend that came from any rational thought process.

 

[simon43]

[quote]

...

The Refugee Convention does not require refugees to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter.

...

[/quote]

 

Correct, but the vast majority of those coming to the UK are not refugees, fleeing from a war-torn country.  They are economic migrants, and therefore the Refugee Convention does not apply.

 

Since the fall of Assad, have all the so-called refugees from Syria left the UK and returned to help to rebuild their own country?  I bet not!!

[JonnyF]

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s not pretend that came from any rational thought process.

 

You mean like former Labour MP's being arrested for being a Paedo?

 

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/former-labour-mp-arrested-during-paedophile-sting-months-after-suspended/

 

[Purdey]

I suspect that Pakistan will not accept these criminals is that... they are criminals. 

Just a guess. 

[Patong2021]

On 1/14/2025 at 2:31 AM, Neeranam said:

Nothing to do with discrimination in the workplace  

Didn't Pakistanis' former Empress, Victoria, marry her first cousin, Prince Albert?

As if this has anything to do with employment rate. 

 

Desperate to avoid the truth you toss out an unrelated event.  Victoria married Albert 185 years ago. ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FIVE years ago. Appreciably, Pakistan is a backwards country, but if they can build nuclear missiles, they can be aware of current medical and genetic information that says that marrying a first cousin is inappropriate. 185 years ago, Pakistan was merely a tribal area of India. Pakistanis  would insist that times have changed and that is why they are independent today.

[Chomper Higgot]

16 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Desperate to avoid the truth you toss out an unrelated event.  Victoria married Albert 185 years ago. ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FIVE years ago. Appreciably, Pakistan is a backwards country, but if they can build nuclear missiles, they can be aware of current medical and genetic information that says that marrying a first cousin is inappropriate. 185 years ago, Pakistan was merely a tribal area of India. Pakistanis  would insist that times have changed and that is why they are independent today.

Pakistan is independent today because the United States put an end to the British Empire by forcing the UK to pay back the war loans and thereby crippling the ability of the UK to keep its empire.

 

It’s ’a special relationship’ don’t you know.