Jump to content

Prince Harry & Claimants told to Spend less in Legal Costs in Case Against Daily Mail


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Prince Harry and a group of high-profile individuals, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley, and Sir Simon Hughes, are pursuing legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over alleged unlawful activities. However, the claimants, who initially proposed a legal budget of approximately £18.7 million, have now been ordered to limit their costs to £4.1 million.  

 

This decision came after High Court judges, Mr. Justice Nicklin and Judge Cook, deemed the proposed costs by both sides—totaling over £38.8 million—“manifestly excessive.” ANL, which has firmly denied the allegations, has also been ordered to restrict its legal costs to around £4.5 million. Judge Cook emphasized that cost management is about setting reasonable and proportionate limits, not reducing expenditures to an irreducible minimum.  

Prince Harry has accused ANL of engaging in various unlawful practices, such as hiring private investigators to plant listening devices in cars, intercepting private phone calls, accessing private records under false pretenses, and even orchestrating burglaries to obtain information. ANL, however, has dismissed these claims as “lurid” and “simply preposterous.”  

 

Judge Cook acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case but stressed that it would be approached like any other legal matter, stating, “The fact that these claimants are well-known, and the litigation high-profile, does not affect the issues that must be resolved.” He added that the case’s ultimate simplicity lay in whether the claimants could successfully prove their allegations. “The claimants will either succeed or fail in demonstrating the proposition,” he explained.  

 

The trial is scheduled to begin on January 14, 2026, with an estimated duration of 45 days. Judge Cook noted that while the factual issues may be complex, the legal framework surrounding the claims is straightforward.  

 

This ruling follows a recent victory for Prince Harry in a separate case against the publishers of *The Sun* newspaper. The Duke of Sussex reportedly received an eight-figure settlement and a “full and unequivocal apology” for invasions of his privacy. Described as a “monumental victory” against the British press, it marked another significant win after his success against the publishers of *The Mirror* in 2023.  

 

As the legal battle with ANL unfolds, it continues to highlight the broader issue of privacy and accountability in the British media. While the case draws significant attention due to the prominence of the individuals involved, the court’s focus remains firmly on the evidence and legal principles that underpin the claims.

 

Based on a report by The Independent 2025-01-27

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Harry really should get a job. It might help him move on. 

 

He clearly has too much time on his hands. 

Hardly wasting his time ........

If they can afford 20M pounds on lawyers, they can afford 10M pounds for him to go away. That's a nice payday for anyone, and very little effort required.

Posted
4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Hardly wasting his time ........

If they can afford 20M pounds on lawyers, they can afford 10M pounds for him to go away. That's a nice payday for anyone, and very little effort required.

 

Markle will get most of it in the divorce. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...