USAID: The Big Exposure Reveals...

[placeholder]

47 minutes ago, illisdean said:

says the biden luvin liberal loser hater. You GOT NOTHING, but a whole lot of butt-hurt....and.... (tell you later....shortly)

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, the Biden administration didn't take money from FEMA emergency funds to fund immigrations related matters. That honor belongs to the Trump administration

Trump administration moved FEMA funding to immigration efforts

When Trump was president, his administration shifted FEMA funding, including money from the Disaster Relief Fund, to address immigration.

In 2019, the Department of Homeland Security announced it was “reprogramming” some funds Congress had set aside.The department said it would transfer $271 million to immigration efforts. That included about $155 million from FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund base budget.

https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2024/fema-hurricane-milton-money-spent-immigrants/

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

More deflection from you. 

 

Again: Do you have anything that supports your claim that Congress stipulates how FEMA funds are to be spent?

 

 

I can't help you and your apparently limited level of literacy any further. If you can't be bothered to read the article i linked to, there's nothing more I plan to do. Of course, if you are willing to pay me for reading lessons, we may come to some sort of agreement.

[Yellowtail]

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I can't help you and your apparently limited level of literacy any further. If you can't be bothered to read the article i linked to, there's nothing more I plan to do. Of course, if you are willing to pay me for reading lessons, we may come to some sort of agreement.

So, you were lying. Thanks for the conformation. 

[illisdean]

Everyones favorite America luvin patriot DOGE genius uncovering and announcing more FEMA funding for Bidens illegal aliens for luxury accommodations in NYC.

 

 

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you were lying. Thanks for the conformation. 

If you have evidence that what I've said is false point to it. I've provided a link to the evidence. If you can't be bothered to read what is linked to, there is nothing I can do about your willful ignorance. Stay ignorant for all I care.

And the charge of lying is particularly entertaining coming from you. Remember your claim that 4 children in the elementary school you were attending died from measles vaccines in 1952? Even though there were no measles vaccines on offer until about a decade later? You truly are a lowlife.

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

If you have evidence that what I've said is false point to it. I've provided a link to the evidence. If you can't be bothered to read what is linked to, there is nothing I can do about your willful ignorance. Stay ignorant for all I care.

And the charge of lying is particularly entertaining coming from you. Remember your claim that 4 children in the elementary school you were attending died from measles vaccines in 1952? Even though there were no measles vaccines on offer until about a decade later? You truly are a lowlife.

You made the false claim that Congress stipulates how FEMA funds are to be spent. 

 

And then you posted a link to an article that did not support the claim, and when you get called on it, you call me stupid and double down on your lie. 

 

Your link does not support your claim that Congress stipulates how FEMA funds are to be spent. 

[illisdean]

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You truly are a lowlife.

HA HA HA and you are the consummate Trump DOGE hater experiencing untold butt-hurt and can't deal with it. Sucks to be you placeholder. LOL. Try getting a life before u implode like all things hateful and loser liberals do. 

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, illisdean said:

HA HA HA and you are the consummate Trump DOGE hater experiencing untold butt-hurt and can't deal with it. Sucks to be you placeholder. LOL. Try getting a life before u implode like all things hateful and loser liberals do. 

He makes stuff up, posts links to idiocy, and then claims it's up to you to prove he's lying. 

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, illisdean said:

HA HA HA and you are the consummate Trump DOGE hater experiencing untold butt-hurt and can't deal with it. Sucks to be you placeholder. LOL. Try getting a life before u implode like all things hateful and loser liberals do. 

Another apparently inexhaustible source of irony.

[Yellowtail]

Just now, placeholder said:

Another apparently inexhaustible source of irony.

What's ironic is the left thinking they have that moral and intellectual high ground. 

 

Poor, poor lefty. 

[Dan O]

On 2/6/2025 at 10:19 PM, rwilem said:

Thanks to the efforts of the DOGE wunderkinds one of the pillars of the deep state, the administrative state, is being ripped apart and dismantled in real time. The dems and former regime-now-turned-resistance media are howling hysterically, having gone into meltdown mode. Wonder why? The corruption and grift of so many of them (all?) have been exposed, and it's all coming to an end. But in addition to the corruption we also have to consider the psyops perpetrated on the Americsn people. 

 

"The DOGE discoveries are not just about "wasted" taxpayer funds. The real story, the 5 alarm fire, is that USAID was literally funding an entirely hand crafted pseudo-reality. Not just in America but all over the world. You were robbed to fund global psychological operations.

 

-Buying off media outlets

 

-Pushing advertiser Boycotts against X and Rumble as they attempted to decrease censorship (AKA narrative control)

 

-Pushing war propaganda

 

-Funding opposition groups in foreign lands to foment revolutions

 

-Funding lawfare against the former president of the united states and his supporters (I could go on for an hour)

 

People get caught up on the "$100K to study cocaines' impact on chihuahua" stories. That is not the headline here.

 

The headline here is: The US government robbed you blind in an effort to control your mind That's about as big as it gets."

 

Lefties can cry and moan all they want. They just continue denying reality, as they always do. 

 

 

 

 

 

a little research on the internet will shed more light on your BS spin it's leftist that caused this problem. Wasted funding is something that needs to stop but its both parties that created this situation and both that share the responsibility. Its just a convenient talking point for trumpettes though to blame everything on dems or leftist. This program started in the 1960's and EVERY president since has been involved in adding to the appointing the directors, adding projects, countries and budgets. 

 

 

 

 

[Yagoda]

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What's ironic is the left thinking they have that moral and intellectual high ground. 

 

Poor, poor lefty. 

The best part are the commercials they are making for the upcoming midterms. Democrat histrionics are priceless, and with the comedians all sensing which way the wind is blowing.........

 

"While you struggled to pay your bills, Rep/Sen Grubbyfingers was advocating for you to pay for Tranny operas in the Sanjack of Novii Pazaar"

 

 

[Yagoda]

Just now, Dan O said:

a little research on the internet will shed more light on your BS spin it's leftist that caused this problem. Wasted funding is something that needs to stop but its both parties that created this situation and both that share the responsibility. Its just a convenient talking point for trumpettes though to blame everything on dems or leftist. This program started in the 1960's and EVERY president since has been involved in adding to the appointing the directors, adding projects, countries and budgets. 

 

 

 

 

Good. Its everyones fault. So you agree we should cut off the spigot immediately, right?

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

a little research on the internet will shed more light on your BS spin it's leftist that caused this problem. Wasted funding is something that needs to stop but its both parties that created this situation and both that share the responsibility. Its just a convenient talking point for trumpettes though to blame everything on dems or leftist. This program started in the 1960's and EVERY president since has been involved in adding to the appointing the directors, adding projects, countries and budgets. 

 

So, at least you admit it's a problem, that's something. 

 

Do you support correcting the problem as well? 

 

[connda]

[Yellowtail]

And again, all it would take for the funding of any one of these programs to be turned back on, would be for a couple of people in Congress to stand up and make a case for it on the record. 

 

That none of them are doing this speaks volumes. 

[illisdean]

If true, and it most likely is (no reason to believe its false) considering the source, it would be criminal

 

 

[Dan O]

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Good. Its everyones fault. So you agree we should cut off the spigot immediately, right?

why do you make ridiculous statements? Yes its both parties faults and every President that allowed fat to be added and signed off and thats on both parties. The problem didnt start in 1 presidency, it built up over time just like every other bloated program in the govt. Cant you read? I believe I was clear in what I wrote.

[Yellowtail]

Just now, Dan O said:

why do you make ridiculous statements? Yes its both parties faults and every President that allowed fat to be added and signed off and thats on both parties. The problem didnt start in 1 presidency, it built up over time just like every other bloated program in the govt. Cant you read? I believe I was clear in what I wrote.

So, at least you admit it's a problem, that's something. 

 

Do you support correcting the problem as well? 

[Dan O]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So, at least you admit it's a problem, that's something. 

 

Do you support correcting the problem as well? 

 

I never said it wasn't a problem and you can't show 1 post where I said that so stop your trolling.

 

There are countless programs that have pork added and congress never reads them completely to see what's in them, just will it help them get votes. You just like to argue even when you have no position. all the bloated programs should be corrected but there's a right way to go about it and a disconnected, convoluted, vindictive way to try to fix things. Slashing and burning everything at the same time is not the way to fix things correctly and you're about to see the economic and international politic blowback. 

[simple1]

On 2/7/2025 at 1:19 AM, rwilem said:

Buying off media outlets

 

As an example of the many unproven  / unsupported claims in your post where's the proof? Eg.

 

Several major news outlets including Politico and the Associated Press have rejected unsubstantiated accusations by President Donald Trump and right-wing influencers that the U.S. Agency for International Development paid millions of taxpayer dollars to newsrooms in exchange for coverage favoring the Democratic Party.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/news-outlets-reject-trump-accusations-usaid-media-payoff-2025-02-07/

 

BTW from your link:

 

Biden administration didn’t steal $1 billion from FEMA for migrants. Trump’s claim is Pants on Fire!

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

I never said it wasn't a problem and you can't show 1 post where I said that so stop your trolling.

I never said you said it was a problem.

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

 

There are countless programs that have pork added and congress never reads them completely to see what's in them, just will it help them get votes. You just like to argue even when you have no position. all the bloated programs should be corrected but there's a right way to go about it and a disconnected, convoluted, vindictive way to try to fix things. Slashing and burning everything at the same time is not the way to fix things correctly and you're about to see the economic and international politic blowback. 

We agree there is a problem. 

 

We disagree on how to stop it. 

 

All that would be required to get funding turned on for any single program would be for a couple members of Congress to stand up on the record in support of the funding. None are willing to do that, so they can't be doing much that is important to Congress. 

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

As an example of the many unproven  / unsupported claims in your post where's the proof? Eg.

 

Several major news outlets including Politico and the Associated Press have rejected unsubstantiated accusations by President Donald Trump and right-wing influencers that the U.S. Agency for International Development paid millions of taxpayer dollars to newsrooms in exchange for coverage favoring the Democratic Party.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/news-outlets-reject-trump-accusations-usaid-media-payoff-2025-02-07/

They got the money, they are only saying it was not to favor the left. 

[Yagoda]

49 minutes ago, Dan O said:

why do you make ridiculous statements? Yes its both parties faults and every President that allowed fat to be added and signed off and thats on both parties. The problem didnt start in 1 presidency, it built up over time just like every other bloated program in the govt. Cant you read? I believe I was clear in what I wrote.

Why you getting hysterical? Do you agree that we should cut the spigot off or not? 

 

When you find a pile of human crap on your front lawn, you don't run around trying to blame somebody you clean it up

[illisdean]

Maybe Norwegians will be happier now and buy more Tesla's.

 

 

[Dan O]

40 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I never said you said it was a problem.

We agree there is a problem. 

 

We disagree on how to stop it. 

 

All that would be required to get funding turned on for any single program would be for a couple members of Congress to stand up on the record in support of the funding. None are willing to do that, so they can't be doing much that is important to Congress. 

you implied that I didnt think there was a problem.

 

There's still smoke and mirrors going on by the way the media is report Doge and the way things are handled. Many issues targeted cant be turned off by Doge, just identified. There are tons of other programs that havent been mentioned that are being targeted and trump is thinking up new ones daily or axing people he doesnt like or that have disagreed with him so its a sh!tshow. 

 

Yes both sides left and right can add new programs and add pork of their choice and get them passed in the future. That process is one that needs to be cleaned up to prevent either side from conducting business as usual

[Dan O]

9 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Why you getting hysterical? Do you agree that we should cut the spigot off or not? 

 

When you find a pile of human crap on your front lawn, you don't run around trying to blame somebody you clean it up

you the hysterical one that keeps trolling for an argument. I didnt blame 1 person or party.  I blamed both parties as they are both involved so dont kid yourself or continue to try to blame the Dems. These programs go back decades with both parties involved at one time or the other. I already made my position clear so go back read the posts. 

[Yagoda]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

you the hysterical one that keeps trolling for an argument. I didnt blame 1 person or party.  I blamed both parties as they are both involved so dont kid yourself or continue to try to blame the Dems. These programs go back decades with both parties involved at one time or the other. I already made my position clear so go back read the posts. 

Do you support the efforts of Doge and Trump to shut the spigot off or not? I love how you constantly avoid that question.

[illisdean]

19 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Do you support the efforts of Doge and Trump to shut the spigot off or not? I love how you constantly avoid that question.

Of course not, Trump haters NEVER like or want to see Trump WINNING. They prefer he fails and care not about consequences to the country, it stems from their intense feelings of hatred which unfortunately for Trump haters shapes their behavior and displays their total detachment from reality.

This is what so many hate to see. Trump WINNING is a trigger Trump haters cannot accept or manage emotionally. And there is a lot of Trump WINNING going on since Nov 5 2024 and even before. When Trump wins...so does America and the peace loving world and thats what haters seem to hate. They are setting themselves up to be the most miserable losers on the planet for the next 47 months and then another 48 months after that when JD Vance kicks of his WINNING platform for America. 

 

 

 

[placeholder]

5 hours ago, connda said:

If you believe that the fraudulent claims made by that man who claims to be exposing the fraud, then you are a sucker:.

https://archive.ph/InvFn

https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/02/10/elon-musk-pushes-false-claim-ex-usaid-chief-earned-23-million-the-biggest-doge-hoaxes-spread-on-x/