Jump to content

Sen. Elizabeth Warren calls for insurrection!


Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

No, he is not seizing power, although I question some of his tactics. The end result will end up cutting a lot of wasteful spending and outright corruption.  Better to take the medicine now before the disease becomes terminal.

The Dems should get on the government waste-cutting bandwagon.  They are looking foolish tyring to stop it. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I never said it was the same!

But a similar concept. 

Smash everything!

Never claimed you did.  The communist dogma motivated Mao, not so with Trump. 

WARNING:  Hang on for a lecture on what drives Trump's agenda.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Never claimed you did.  The communist dogma motivated Mao, not so with Trump. 

WARNING:  Hang on for a lecture on what drives Trump's agenda.

Trump's dogma is all power to Trump.

Maga has a lot in common with the Maoist cultural revolution which of course led to the deaths of many millions.

Getting rid of elites and people in the government that actually know what they're doing in favor or moronic dear leader loyalists that don't need to know anything.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Trump's dogma is all power to Trump.

Maga has a lot in common with the Maoist cultural revolution which of course led to the deaths of many millions.

Getting rid of elites and people in the government that actually know what they're doing in favor or moronic dear leader loyalists that don't need to know anything.

Thank you for keeping it short.  Any more dire predictions from your crystal ball?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Thank you for keeping it short.  Any more dire predictions from your crystal ball?

I am predicting massive street protests when it becomes clear that Trump refuses to obey court orders.

If you were paying attention which you're obviously not you would know Trump and Vance are already laying their groundwork for that very publicly trying to justify such illegal actions.

Not saying protests will work to stop him though. 

I guess it's possible if it's massive enough.

Posted

What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.

 

"The HYPOCRISY is sickening", agreed, the hypocrisy of Trump, Musk, MAGA. et al.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

I am predicting massive street protests when it becomes clear that Trump refused to obey court orders.

Not saying that will work to stop him though. 

I guess it's possible if it's massive enough.

BFD....

  • Confused 2
Posted

Pharmahontas is only meaningful to Foreign America haters and the discredited US media.

 

As the information about the theft and misuse of money leaks out, the Dems chance of ever regaining power diminish.

 

The squealing in the lobbyist and NGO offices is priceless. 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I am predicting massive street protests when it becomes clear that Trump refuses to obey court orders.

If you were paying attention which you're obviously not you would know Trump and Vance are already laying their groundwork for that very publicly trying to justify such illegal actions.

Not saying protests will work to stop him though. 

I guess it's possible if it's massive enough.

I love it. Your lot out protesting to defend theft. I reckon not unusua, your lot defends sexual perversion, genital mutilation of children, grooming, censorship, racism, hate......

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

Trump held a RALLY outside A GOVERNMENT BUILDING in Washington DC and called on the crowd to 'Fight back' against election theft by the incoming administration, gets accused of inciting a riot.

 

Article on the BBC website today states that Liz (Pocahontas) Warren held a RALLY outside A GOVERNMENT BUILDING in Washington DC and called on the crowd to 'Fight Back' against the incoming administration - Quote - "In the building behind me, Elon Musk is seizing power from the American people," she said last week at a rally outside the Treasury Department in Washington, DC. "We are here to fight back." BBC Report

 

I've said it before - I'm not a Trump fanboy. But the lies and misrepresentations, and the twisting of words, turned me off the Democratic Party and the MSM to the point that I felt sympathy for the OrangeMan!

 

The HYPOCRISY is sickening.


This is the best BS you can sling against a wall?!  Try again tomorrow.   :coffee1:

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Trump's dogma is all power to Trump.

Maga has a lot in common with the Maoist cultural revolution which of course led to the deaths of many millions.

Getting rid of elites and people in the government that actually know what they're doing in favor or moronic dear leader loyalists that don't need to know anything.

Your fascism is showing again.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 hours ago, TedG said:

Name a Democrat who does not lie 

Liawatha thinks she doesn't. Ask any normal person in Massachusetts. 

Posted
20 hours ago, KhunLA said:

NO, actually one of the best things to happen in decades, if not my lifetime.   

 

About time things get pointed out, the curtain pulled back and silliness exposed, and maybe changed, though very doubtful.   As more than half the country are just too freakin' stupid, too brainwashed, or just don't care, as long as they are getting theirs.

you wrote ' As more than half the country are just too freakin' stupid, too brainwashed, or just don't care, '..... I sincerely assume that you are referring to the half who voted for the new President. (not that there was much choice, with Harris as the alternative, was there?)  The US is truly in a deplorable state. I MUST re-watch that movie ''Idiocracy''

Posted
17 hours ago, TedG said:

It’s not true.  The left always needs a boogy man, and Musk is the current one. 

So True. Liberals are like children. It is never there fault. They now have 2 people to blame.

Posted
2 minutes ago, paddypower said:

you wrote ' As more than half the country are just too freakin' stupid, too brainwashed, or just don't care, '..... I sincerely asume that you are referring to the half who voted for the new President. (not that there was much choice, was there? The US is truly in a deplorable state 

NO, basically the whole voting public seriously haven't a clue about politics, politicians, who they vote for, or how the country is run.

 

From total ignorance, to just not caring.  Pretty sad state really.  How many that vote for incumbents, actually research what they voted for, in their first term in office.   Let along the career politicians, who run on the 'country needs a change' and yet, have held office for decades.

 

Seems they are the problem, not the solution.  And yet, idiots continue to re-elect them.  Go figure :coffee1:

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

50% of liberals are fascist. The other 50% are just childish.

No they arent Liberals.

 

Adams, Franklin, Locke, Jefferson, Maimonedes, Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, those guys were liberals: believers in freedom, free speech, equal justice, democracy.

 

Todays so called left, the Socialists, are in no fashion liberal. They stand for control, authoritarianism, hate and violence.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
20 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Do you really think Elon Musk should be allowed to do that?

 

I understand and agree that the government should be more efficient. But the way this is handled is just not the right way. Musk and his team have way too much permissions - as far as I know often without security clearance. 

How its handled or how your media is saying its being handled?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

No they arent Liberals.

 

Adams, Franklin, Locke, Jefferson, Maimonedes, Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, those guys were liberals: believers in freedom, free speech, equal justice, democracy.

 

Todays so called left, the Socialists, are in no fashion liberal. They stand for control, authoritarianism, hate and violence.

Libertarians are different to liberals. Liberal is a broad term. Socialists are just hard left liberals. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

How its handled or how your media is saying its being handled?

He just parrots the Socialist propaganda he reads to troll and keep his post count up.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Libertarians are different to liberals. Liberal is a broad term. Socialists are just hard left liberals. 

No, Im sorry to disagree. For too long us liberals, a term of pride, have allowed ourselves to be coopted by the Socialists and allowed ourselves to be defined in their terms.

 

Thus the Bosheviks fought the National Socialists (sometimes, when they werent trading miltary tech and/or allied with each other in dismembering the Slavic racial/traditional enemy) by calling them "Right", thereby giving us the incongruous situation of having one violent Socialist dictatorship accusing the other of being "right"...the Nazis are murderous a dicatorship, as opposed to the Soviet Union,.

 

To the winner goes the spoils. Lets not ask questions about how long it took General Blokhin to wade through the 20,000 6.35mm rounds he fired through his Walthers. Great guns. Nazis bad! Socialists good.

 

But they are both the same, just some got away with it. How dare they call themselves liberals. How dare they accuse others of being "right". Its simple existential world politics, viz:

 

Socialists believe in their own utopia, where toga clad white workers (or in the case of National Socialists, Germans)  dance to the pan pipes, and they will do or say anything or ally thjemselves with anyone to achieve their utopia. The enemy are those who oppose this and has history shows, they must be violently subdued. For the simple: collectivism maintained by authoritarianism.

 

Or, for all its flaws, US style democracy, which is now Liberal again. 

 

Evolution not revolution

Posted
3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

No, Im sorry to disagree. For too long us liberals, a term of pride, have allowed ourselves to be coopted by the Socialists and allowed ourselves to be defined in their terms.

 

Thus the Bosheviks fought the National Socialists (sometimes, when they werent trading miltary tech and/or allied with each other in dismembering the Slavic racial/traditional enemy) by calling them "Right", thereby giving us the incongruous situation of having one violent Socialist dictatorship accusing the other of being "right"...the Nazis are murderous a dicatorship, as opposed to the Soviet Union,.

 

To the winner goes the spoils. Lets not ask questions about how long it took General Blokhin to wade through the 20,000 6.35mm rounds he fired through his Walthers. Great guns. Nazis bad! Socialists good.

 

But they are both the same, just some got away with it. How dare they call themselves liberals. How dare they accuse others of being "right". Its simple existential world politics, viz:

 

Socialists believe in their own utopia, where toga clad white workers (or in the case of National Socialists, Germans)  dance to the pan pipes, and they will do or say anything or ally thjemselves with anyone to achieve their utopia. The enemy are those who oppose this and has history shows, they must be violently subdued. For the simple: collectivism maintained by authoritarianism.

 

Or, for all its flaws, US style democracy, which is now Liberal again. 

 

Evolution not revolution

Im libertarian, wanted Ron Paul. Not interested in politics until now where its clear that half of America is rooting for iran china and russia

Posted
7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

No, Im sorry to disagree. For too long us liberals, a term of pride, have allowed ourselves to be coopted by the Socialists and allowed ourselves to be defined in their terms.

 

Thus the Bosheviks fought the National Socialists (sometimes, when they werent trading miltary tech and/or allied with each other in dismembering the Slavic racial/traditional enemy) by calling them "Right", thereby giving us the incongruous situation of having one violent Socialist dictatorship accusing the other of being "right"...the Nazis are murderous a dicatorship, as opposed to the Soviet Union,.

 

To the winner goes the spoils. Lets not ask questions about how long it took General Blokhin to wade through the 20,000 6.35mm rounds he fired through his Walthers. Great guns. Nazis bad! Socialists good.

 

But they are both the same, just some got away with it. How dare they call themselves liberals. How dare they accuse others of being "right". Its simple existential world politics, viz:

 

Socialists believe in their own utopia, where toga clad white workers (or in the case of National Socialists, Germans)  dance to the pan pipes, and they will do or say anything or ally thjemselves with anyone to achieve their utopia. The enemy are those who oppose this and has history shows, they must be violently subdued. For the simple: collectivism maintained by authoritarianism.

 

Or, for all its flaws, US style democracy, which is now Liberal again. 

 

Evolution not revolution

We all have different definitions but agree with you mostly. Socialism is a mental illness.

Posted
29 minutes ago, hotsun said:

Im libertarian, wanted Ron Paul. Not interested in politics until now where its clear that half of America is rooting for iran china and russia

Im more of a Rand Paul type, Ronnie palled around with National Socialists

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...