Of course. However, before accusing someone of fraud, evidence must be shown.
On top of it, as the tax returns have been publicized, you can be sure they have been scrutinised by GOP analysts (and that the Dems did the same for GOP congressmen).
Which is what you should have done. I use my next door laundry to clean my dirty washing, not a public forum!
I am surprised that a snowflake like you has not melted away in the Thai heat!
Good question, the father's politics may be irrelevant.
However, even Starmer has called this ruling an error. This "judge" has a history of controversial rulings, with this one again using an EHCR rule, ignoring the fact that this application was made via the facility for Ukrainian refugees.
I think that the problem here is that too many positions of power are allowed to be occupied by political activists.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now