On 3/7/2025 at 9:34 AM, SLOWHAND225 said:

So very predictable

 

https://x.com/nypost/status/1897795317833080963

 

That headline is a tad misleading.

 

Although there was not unanimity on a final communiqué, the EU did agree to continue to provide funding to Ukraine.

 

Here's an extract from an announcement made by the Council of Europe after the meeting. 

 

Quote

The European Union will continue to provide Ukraine with regular and predictable financial support. In 2025, it will provide Ukraine with EUR 30.6 billion ...

 

Ukraine

 

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/06/european-council-ukraine/

 

Also don't forget that two days earlier, Ursula von der Leyen announced a fund of $840 billion to allow EU members to increase their defence spending. 

 

And as she pointed out, that would among other things, mean that: 

 

Quote

"With this equipment, Member States can massively step up their support to Ukraine… 

 

As Trump halts aid to Ukraine, EU unveils $840 billion defense investment "ReArm Europe" plan

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-war-trump-eu-defense-investment-rearm-europe-plan/

On 3/9/2025 at 9:43 PM, Hamus Yaigh said:

What is so very predictable is people like you posting dishonest bs biased in one political direction only? Why not tell the WHOLE news instead of one biased source?

 

Here's some clues for the uneducated:
 

Western media outlets like The New York Times, BBC, or CNN might report more favorably on Ukraine, emphasizing the need for international support and condemning Russian aggression. In contrast The NY Post is owned by News Corp, a media conglomerate with a conservative leaning. The NY Post's editorial board has historically taken a more right-wing stance and this has turned to more extremist right during the current right wing US administration.

 

e.g. Internet news search (only ONE result comes close to yours and NYP opinionated bs):

 

1. Ukraine summit in Brussels ends with no consensus after .(NY Post)

2. EU leaders back new military spending plans at Ukraine summit (AP)

3. EU leaders vow to re-arm Europe amid US retreat on Ukraine (France 24)

4. European leaders agree on defense spending surge (CNN)

 

Hope this helps.

Except the Euros don't have the money to do what they say. That's a result of wasting billions on illegal immigrants and a stupid proxy war.

IMO.

On 3/9/2025 at 10:23 PM, GroveHillWanderer said:

 

That headline is a tad misleading.

 

Although there was not unanimity on a final communiqué, the EU did agree to continue to provide funding to Ukraine.

 

Here's an extract from an announcement made by the Council of Europe after the meeting. 

 

 

Ukraine

 

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/06/european-council-ukraine/

 

Also don't forget that two days earlier, Ursula von der Leyen announced a fund of $840 billion to allow EU members to increase their defence spending. 

 

And as she pointed out, that would among other things, mean that: 

 

 

As Trump halts aid to Ukraine, EU unveils $840 billion defense investment "ReArm Europe" plan

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-war-trump-eu-defense-investment-rearm-europe-plan/

None of which avoids the reality that Ukraine is losing in the east and in Kursk. Seems it wasn't a good idea to send the best troops for defeat in a stupid adventure in Kursk.

On 3/11/2025 at 2:49 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

None of which avoids the reality that Ukraine is losing in the east and in Kursk. Seems it wasn't a good idea to send the best troops for defeat in a stupid adventure in Kursk.

They're losing ground in Kursk, but not in the East. They're making progress against the Russians in both Toretsk and Pokrovsk while things remain fairly static elsewhere. 

 

Ukraine War Map Shows Kyiv Regain Ground in Two Major Strongholds

 

https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-war-map-regain-ground-toretsk-2036296