Biden AutoPen Signature scandal

[placeholder]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

If it can be shown that Biden was unaware of what he was "signing", or if it can be shown that staff were using his signature, I think they could be voided. 

 

But there is no way Biden will go against his staffers. 

The current Supreme Court has been very zealous in protecting the Power of the Presidency. In some ways over the top. Given that there is a Constitutional mechanism for removing a President judged to be unfit, I doubt the Supreme Court would accept such arguments.

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

If it can be shown that Biden was unaware of what he was "signing", or if it can be shown that staff were using his signature, I think they could be voided. 

 

But there is no way Biden will go against his staffers. 

The current Supreme Court has been very zealous in protecting the Power of the Presidency. In some ways over the top. Given that there is a Constitutional mechanism for removing a President judged to be unfit, I doubt the Supreme Court would accept such arguments.

[riclag]

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

He too far gone to remember.

Which brings me back to the Hurr interview . Remember the audio recording 

Garland refused to submit!

 

 

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Rather than constantly discussing/attacking other members, why do you not try to come up a comment of you own?

You quoted the wrong person there. 

[Yellowtail]

18 minutes ago, placeholder said:

The current Supreme Court has been very zealous in protecting the Power of the Presidency. In some ways over the top. Given that there is a Constitutional mechanism for removing a President judged to be unfit, I doubt the Supreme Court would accept such arguments.

As I said, I do not see the pardons being canceled. 

 

It is my position that the court did not rule on the specific pardons. 

 

If Biden came out and said he had no knowledge of the signings (which he won't), and that it was something his staff did (which they likely did) I think the pardons would be canceled, and the staff prosecuted. 

 

Trump can't just cancel the pardons, nor can Biden for that matter. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

You quoted the wrong person there. 

Rather than constantly discussing/attacking other members, why do you not try to come up a comment of you own?

[thaibeachlovers]

20 hours ago, TorquayFan said:

 

Riclag - you refer to the $8 million that DOGE/Trump claim had been spent on making mice transgender. That claim is just slimey self-serving nonsense. 

 

Bear in mind that $8 million is anyway, a paltrey sum in the USA budget.

 

Here are some of the Research projects included in that sum :-

 

e.g. the impact of hormone therapy and oestrogen supplements in respect of breast cancer.

 

e.g. the impact of hormone therapy and it's possible affect on an HIV vaccine development.

 

e.g. looking at the possible links between hormone therapy and asthma.

 

I don't have a background in medical science but evenso, it's evident that DOGE/Trump and the Trumptie Numpties have got this wrong.

 

Wilful and misleading nonsense - the hallmark of Chief Numptie, Trump !

 

Listen to this at 4 mins 50 secs in https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0028swz
 

(you may need to copy this link and search to make it work - good luck)

 

 

Assuming that "hormone therapy" refers to the drugs males use to pretend to be a female, why should the rest of us pay to do research on that? If they are worried about it don't take the hormones, or pay for the research themselves.

[Jingthing]

21 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Assuming that "hormone therapy" refers to the drugs males use to pretend to be a female, why should the rest of us pay to do research on that? If they are worried about it don't take the hormones, or pay for the research themselves.

You make a lot of specious assumptions.