.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 3 members
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
518
Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict
So, savages killing savages, yes? -
6
Online buying
Yes at least 15 years ago I had an account with Cahoot ( subsiduary of Santander) I was able to create one off card numbers for online purchases - after a few years they took the option away - sometimes I think banks are on the side of the criminals!! -
145
Nightmare in Kursk: Ukrainian Troops Recount Devastating Retreat
In Russia, a free judicial system does not exist. The authorities can imprison anyone they want, whenever they want (add that to your "quality of life" considerations above). Now, imagine imprisoning your relatively young and healthy political opponent—who also happens to be Putin’s most prominent rival, Alexei Navalny—only for him to suddenly die under mysterious circumstances. Surely, it couldn’t be Putin! Honestly, I find it disgusting how effortlessly you repeat the most blatant putinist propaganda—the worst kind there is. -
87
So whats your favorite flavor ? _ Thai or Fillipino ?
Two more of their mates: https://www.instagram.com/blackangel_vix https://www.instagram.com/rainbowdragonlife -
25
US Deports Hundreds of Alleged Venezuelan Gang Members Despite Court Order
I have, as you both know, posted in opposition to the movement of these people for the purpose of incarceration by a third party. I posted as I believe it is wrong, because they were assembled, rounded up, whatever the phrase used, under a 240 year old law, intended to be used in wartime, and which has been thoroughly discredited. If these people were convicted criminals they should be serving the sentences handed down by the courts which convicted them, and or deported to their country of origin as ordered by the courts. If they are accused of crimes then they should be tried, and if convicted, be imprisoned and or deported. If they are illegally in the USA then they should be brought before the appropriate courts and deported to their country of origin. Those are their human rights. Instead they have been arbitrarily transported, to another country, which will incarcerate them (under pretty savage conditions) for a year or possibly longer, paid for by the US. No court has authorised that arbitrary detention. There appears to have been no judicial involvement, purely an executive order. That order and the process it initiated, when challenged by a court, continued in effect. The judge who intervened said that transporting them was not to happen, and that the flights should return to US. That the flights were in "international airspace" when the order was issued is a particularly feeble excuse to flout the judges order. So their "human rights" have been severely infringed. Human rights are often an inconvenience, and with good reason, they prevent miscarriages of justice. A very dangerous precedent has been set. Presidential fiat is being used to short circuit the law, and ignore the law when it responds. I am not surprised at @thaibeachlovers response, I rather thought that @Eloquent pilgrimwould have had rather more respect for the rule of law - obviously not. I received one other reply, one of the more regularly vituperative posters snarled that I should have been put in the prison with them. That post was removed in short order. It has been a very bad couple of days for the rule of law in the USA.- 1
-
-
6
DTV Application in London - Financial Evidence?
No, you are good - I got it from your earlier post, thank you. Ties in nicely as confirmation of what @DrJack54
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now