Is America doomed

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, Showtime said:

 

Dr. John Clauser

I had another one bookmarked, but the internet deleted all reference to the persons thoughts since they didn't fit the narrative.  If anyone know how to use the internet's time machine it is hopefully still there.

So you are quoting one Nobel Laureate in science. Who, on climate change, is described as a pseudo-scientist. His award was in quantum mechanics.

 

As I don't have telepathy, I can't help with your "bookmarked" person.

 

Now how many Nobel Laureates in science support climate change resulting from anthropomorphic emissions?

 

As an argument ad vericundiam, your post is a logical fallacy.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 3/29/2025 at 6:55 AM, Maxbkkcm said:

America leads the desire in the world by their products and lifestyle. The only ones who can design high value and quality products too. Plus with the strongest branding ever. Those are the only thing that matter for modern humans. If you name one country that can do the same then America is doomed. 

 

Most humans, wants an iphone, a pair of nike, a tesla ect Wants to eat shakeshak or MCd. NY and california representing something ect 

 

They will be doomed IF there were competitors....

BS, IMO. 

I don't have much if anything made in America. Japan makes tools as good as Snap on and the American electric tools, Japan and Sth Korea make all my electronics, my car was made in Japan.

Any minor stuff will be made in China. 

I did use to fly on a Boeing 747, but that was many years ago. Now it's one of those Airbus planes.

I don't even wear jeans.

America has nothing to offer me- I don't even want to go there.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 3/29/2025 at 6:59 AM, hotsun said:

The rest of the world will also never catch up in terms of entertainment. Sports specifically

Sport? You mean those pansies that wear all the protective gear to play with a ball, or a hockey puck? Boring. That leaves baseball, which might be interesting if I thought grown men playing with a ball was worth my time to watch.

[Showtime]

11 hours ago, Lacessit said:

So you are quoting one Nobel Laureate in science. Who, on climate change, is described as a pseudo-scientist. His award was in quantum mechanics.

 

As I don't have telepathy, I can't help with your "bookmarked" person.

 

Now how many Nobel Laureates in science support climate change resulting from anthropomorphic emissions?

 

As an argument ad vericundiam, your post is a logical fallacy.

If you look further he came up with his own model that essentially said clouds were not figured into the climate change calculation.  Subsequently climate change believer scientists have admitted he was right and clouds are a big deal.

 

Not the one I was originally looking for in my bookmarks where the article mysteriously disappeared on the bookmarked paage, but look up Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever.  Also there were 1,100 climate scientists and related professionals who signed a formal 2022 “World Climate Declaration (WCD)” stating that there is no climate emergency.

[Showtime]

On 3/31/2025 at 11:40 AM, Lacessit said:

False. The EU and UK combined have provided more funding to Ukraine than America.

 

The US contribution is mainly obsolete and redundant equipment it was going to scrap anyway.

As of March 11, 2025, "The majority of committed support by country has come from the United States, whose total aid commitment is valued at about $128 billion. The U.S. is followed by the United Kingdom and Germany for highest commitments overall. The European Union as a whole has committed approximately $124 billion in aid to Ukraine."

[Showtime]

On 3/31/2025 at 11:43 AM, Rob Browder said:

I can see the point with Europe - especially given no reason for NATO to exist after the USSR + Warsaw Pact dissolved. 

 

Funny, though, how to spite the massive and growing national-debt, Israel gets more and more free tens of billions in "aid," plus deploying military-backup costing many billion more, every year - and they just happen to have a PAC (not registered as a foreign-agent) which donates heavily to almost everyone in Congress, and to Trump's campaign.  You get what you pay for, apparently - and with a huge ROI on those "donations."

 

The "DOGE" savings could never hope to recoup those ongoing losses, so don't hold out hope for paying down debt, or DOGE refund-checks.

I can't figure out why we support terrorist Israel in its war against terrorist Hamas.  That said the biggest terrorists in no specific order are USA, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Hamas, Israel

 

I can only dream about paying down debt or getting a check.

[Showtime]

On 3/31/2025 at 11:35 AM, Lacessit said:

They don't need accountants and lawyers, they are the ones who got the US steel industry into its diminished state. Along with Boeing's dismal recent safety record.

 

South Korea is a highly developed economy with a strong manufacturing sector, and advanced technology. Heavily invested in STEM, and R&D.

 

It has more scientists and engineers as a percentage of its workforce than any other country.

 

QED.

I guess you fancy talking off topic.

[Lacessit]

5 hours ago, Showtime said:

I guess you fancy talking off topic.

I guess you play that card when what I am posting does not agree with your refuted posts.

 

Like the BS claim Trump's popular vote was the biggest ever.

[Lacessit]

5 hours ago, Showtime said:

As of March 11, 2025, "The majority of committed support by country has come from the United States, whose total aid commitment is valued at about $128 billion. The U.S. is followed by the United Kingdom and Germany for highest commitments overall. The European Union as a whole has committed approximately $124 billion in aid to Ukraine."

The UK is not part of the EU. Its commitment to  Ukraine thus far is $16.5 billion.

 

$124 billion + $16.5 billion = $140.5 billion.

 

Are you trying to set a new record for the number of lies posted?

[3NUMBAS]

Like  general custers last stand ,outgunned by the red skins ,doomed by 

american arrogance 

[Lacessit]

5 hours ago, Showtime said:

If you look further he came up with his own model that essentially said clouds were not figured into the climate change calculation.  Subsequently climate change believer scientists have admitted he was right and clouds are a big deal.

 

Not the one I was originally looking for in my bookmarks where the article mysteriously disappeared on the bookmarked paage, but look up Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever.  Also there were 1,100 climate scientists and related professionals who signed a formal 2022 “World Climate Declaration (WCD)” stating that there is no climate emergency.

I don't think either of the scientists you cite can deny the laws of thermodynamics. IMO clouds are an effect of climate change, not a cause.

 

The 1100 scientists are wrong. Conservative models of the Tibetan Plateau predict by 2050 flows to the Mekong, Ganges and Brahmaputra will be halved, affecting the lives of the billion people who depend on those rivers for food. That's without the 2000 odd dams the Chinese have built or are building.

 

Over the last 20 years, the average ice loss from Greenland is about 270 gigatons. Sea level rise on the eastern seaboard of America is about 6 inches thus far.

 

It's not unknown for scientists to disagree. It's also not unknown for some scientists to have their opinions funded by people who prefer to look away, for financial reasons.

[3NUMBAS]

dust my blues elmore james