Jump to content

Trump to Cut Federal Funding to Sanctuary Cities Amid Immigration Clash


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm just surprised he didn't do it on day 1. If they don't want to conform to federal law, then remove federal funding from them till they do.

 

He probably had to have people study the feasibility/legalities of it.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Are you claiming the POTUS is not a world leader? Gee wizz, who would have thought? Thanks for pointing out that important piece of information.

I know you got difficulties in reading and understanding. 

But why do you like to show it to public🤔? Sado-maso addiction? 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I can only presume that the citizens in these sanctuary cities voted for their local representatives and are in favour of the policies (that they voted for).

Then along comes the federal government and says, We don't care who you elected and what policies you voted for, we don't need your form of democracy.

Posted
On 4/12/2025 at 8:32 AM, newbee2022 said:

Another action of a low IQ dement self appointed world's leader😵‍💫

 

Obama deported millions, did you say this then as well?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Is Obama the president? Did I miss something?😳

Well he was until January, in his official terms he deported over 4 million

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Is Obama the president? Did I miss something?😳

yes I think you missed the boat a long time ago

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, flexomike said:

yes I think you missed the boat a long time ago

And now you are paddling with one oar in the water 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/12/2025 at 7:33 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm just surprised he didn't do it on day 1. If they don't want to conform to federal law, then remove federal funding from them till they do.

 

Because it is a two-edged sword.

 

Remove federal funding from too many states/cities and they might start to think that they do not need a federation at all...

Posted
On 4/12/2025 at 9:51 AM, proton said:

Sanctuary for illegals, gang members, child abusers and drug runners, why?

Have you ever  wondered why the left and dems want to protect Bidens newcomers?

 

20 hours ago, pgrahmm said:

What's to understand? Why underwrite a criminals actions.... Whether foreign or domestic (aiding & abetting)

If I were in a country illegally, no matter the reason: I'd expect to be deported.....And rightfully so.....

 

The dems are losing their base of minority voters every election cycle!

They needed a influx of new dependencies from around the world.

 

Trump tried to close the border in his first administration , he was labeled a racist by the left, dems , propagandists news outlets.

 

Biden was supposed to be a moderate 

democrat unfortunately he let or didn’t know his VP and others on the extreme left were running the show while covering for him. The GOP impeached Mayorkas but the Dem run Senate wouldn’t hold the traditional trial , avoiding all the fraud evidence perpetrated 

by their purposeful open borders.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 4/11/2025 at 9:51 PM, proton said:

Sanctuary for illegals, gang members, child abusers and drug runners, why?

It's the only voting block that might still vote democrat. 😁

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, jts-khorat said:

 

Because it is a two-edged sword.

 

Remove federal funding from too many states/cities and they might start to think that they do not need a federation at all...

Trying that would result in losing federal voting rights and eliminate their positions/reps in both houses. Starting to sound like a good idea. Those lame dickheads in Colorado are trying to pass a new state law that would make parents guilty of child abuse for failing to properly identify your child's gender. If the school officials disagree with a parent, the parent can have their child taken from them by the state. :crazy:

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, jts-khorat said:

 

Because it is a two-edged sword.

 

Remove federal funding from too many states/cities and they might start to think that they do not need a federation at all...

 

3 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

Trying that would result in losing federal voting rights and eliminate their positions/reps in both houses. Starting to sound like a good idea. Those lame dickheads in Colorado are trying to pass a new state law that would make parents guilty of child abuse for failing to properly identify your child's gender. If the school officials disagree with a parent, the parent can have their child taken from them by the state. :crazy:

 

 I am really surprised. I would not have thought that you would advocate for secession and a breakup of the United States.

 

But maybe Maga followers are really that stupid that they rather want to destroy the US than live in one that is "too woke". Actually, be my guest, nobody needs the USA anymore and the world would be a much better place without it, so I agree with you.

 

Or maybe -- actually the most likely -- you have not understood that we talk here about funding of whole cities and states? Your answer does not really seem to match my post.

Posted
12 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

I know you got difficulties in reading and understanding. 

But why do you like to show it to public🤔? Sado-maso addiction? 

But his Māori is pretty good

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...