Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Why so many conspiracy theorists and what to do about them

Featured Replies

On 5/6/2026 at 9:35 PM, rattlesnake said:

Here is footage in a balloon at 121,000 feet (without a fisheye lens):

Did you know that pictures need to be authenticated in person by a witness before they're accepted as evidence in the courts?

Perhaps you should not trust photos to the extent that you do.

Edited by gamb00ler

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Views 48.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Why so many conspiracy theorists and what to do about them   Mark your calendar and look again in 6 months, because so many of them are actually spoiler alerts.  

  • richard_smith237
    richard_smith237

    This thread is cat-nip for the intellectual sewer rats, sniffing out another thread to infect.   Flat earthers, the remedial class rejects who still think “gravity” is a government hoax. Ant

  • Stiddle Mump
    Stiddle Mump

    More conspiracy theories are not at all.   They are truths denied by authorities, to stop us becoming intrigued; and then investigating further.

Posted Images

On 5/6/2026 at 9:35 PM, rattlesnake said:

'Edge of space' is just a fancy word for 'high up in the sky'. In the case of this company, they go up to max 22 km, or 72,000 feet.

Here is footage in a balloon at 121,000 feet (without a fisheye lens):

Per your theory, you can't photograph a skyscraper scraper ten miles away because of the "vanishing point", yes?

But also per your theory, you can see a balloon ~23 miles away, yes?

What happened to the vanishing point?

Congratulations to you guys for resisting the urge for 13 days. Here we go again then, as per your request.

1 hour ago, gamb00ler said:

Perhaps you should not trust photos to the extent that you do.

A very astute remark which we should all take into account. I would go as far as saying that only what is verifiable by one's own eyes qualifies as solid evidence. I'll have to organise a balloon trip.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Per your theory, you can't photograph a skyscraper scraper ten miles away because of the "vanishing point", yes?

But also per your theory, you can see a balloon ~23 miles away, yes?

What happened to the vanishing point?

I said "footage in a ballon", not "footage of a balloon".

10 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

l

I said "footage in a ballon", not "footage of a balloon".

How do you know the footage is real, ad where it comes from?

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Perhaps you should not trust photos to the extent that you do.

... Says the fella who (most likely) believes every visual from NASA is actually real 😂

22 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How do you know the footage is real, ad where it comes from?

I don't, but I like to encourage people to draw elementary conclusions, which they can then apply to their own preferred material. This should be especially useful for the folk who authoritatively present footage ridden with fisheye lens concave-convex glitches, or fakeries which NASA itself says is CGI.

13 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds said:

... Says the fella who (most likely) believes every visual from NASA is actually real 😂

Exactly.

  • Popular Post
18 hours ago, Hummin said:

On the science, the CDC says pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits as raw milk, and the FDA says pasteurization kills pathogens without any significant impact on milk’s nutritional quality.

CDC and FDA would potentially be complicit with the conspiracy.

Not saying the conspiracy is true, but the Raw Milk Institute is trying to get raw milk back.

https://www.rawmilkinstitute.org/updates/letter-to-medical-professionals-about-raw-milk

Like breastmilk, raw milk is a living whole food which provides excellent nutrition along with health-supporting enzymes and probiotics. Raw milk has a superior nutrient profile, whereas pasteurized milk has diminished nutrition with denatured proteins and fats. People who are lactose intolerant can often consume raw milk with no maldigestion, due to the presence of a variety of living bacteria which facilitate production of lactase enzyme in the intestines. Raw milk also aids in recovery from antibiotic use, and provides many gut-healthy probiotics and enzymes.

18 hours ago, Hummin said:

I asked AI whether raw milk has any real health benefits

You cannot blindly trust AI.

When there is a controversial issue it will spit out one version.

A more complete answer would have included alternate theories and then explained why it doesn't agree with the alternate theories.

Here's another one.

George Orwell 1984 = CIA / deep state / elites SPOOK.

Ayn Rand too probably.

Not sure who else.

4 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

You cannot blindly trust AI.

When there is a controversial issue it will spit out one version.

A more complete answer would have included alternate theories and then explained why it doesn't agree with the alternate theories.

When you pay for AI, you can guide it toward stronger research and away from weak sources like social media, Reddit, and other so-called fact-based noise that often gets mixed in.

But you still need to stay sober and verify the results yourself.

There is no solid research supporting the idea that raw milk is healthier, and that is what I rely on, not wishful thinking dressed up as proof.

And people should also remember that raw milk has become a business of its own, often sold at a premium over pasteurized milk

If you looking for a conspiracy plot, sorry, but still interesting for those who sitll believe in science and discoveries they make and publish. She is actually one of the better provider for us who are not gifted with science grade level education

She's a supermodel gatekeeper.

Antarctica, as we are told it is, is 💯% phake.

Green screened, CGI, SFX and other fakery.

Edited by Woke to Sounds

23 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds said:

She's a supermodel gatekeeper.

Antarctica, as we are told it is, is 💯% phake.

Green screened, CGI, SFX and other fakery.

I personally know people who have been to Antarctica. Some have worked at polar research stations, some have climbed there, some have base jumped there, and some have skied to the South Pole.

So why do you feel the need to mistrust the world so badly that you stop believing in basic facts?

I can understand the philosophical idea if you believe we are living in a simulation. But even then, the simulated world still follows the rules we experience inside it. The illusion of a physical world is still the world we have to live in.

  • Author
6 hours ago, Woke to Sounds said:

She's a supermodel gatekeeper.

Antarctica, as we are told it is, is 💯% phake.

Green screened, CGI, SFX and other fakery.

Tell that to this lot - https://www.bas.ac.uk/

and David Attenborough, the 3 members of my family who worked there since the 1960s, explain the successful studies in the ozone layer and the research into blue-green algae... how do you explain the cruises that go there these days?

Just finished this little seminar with a mixed panel from diverse backgrounds.

The video asks whether the universe is truly made of objects and particles, or whether reality is deeper than that and really made of fields, patterns, and relationships.

So the philosophical side of me could easily drift toward the idea that what we call reality may be, in some sense, an illusion, or at least far less solid and straightforward than we normally imagine.

Enjoy

https://iai.tv/video/the-substance-of-the-world?fbclid=IwdGRleAR-UsdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xNzM4NDc2NDI2NzAzNzAAAR5frwR8PpmXaWXzLBLwMqSeVmLLrdcAUtva_jz_g5Linly2h2cH5xBn_P-Veg_aem_yUjm2YHdwP85amNT0BlIUA

  • Popular Post

Most of the conspirators that I've came across give me the impression that they play with spiders or they are chronic masturbaters

2 minutes ago, Rams86 said:

Most of the conspirators that I've came across give me the impression that they play with spiders or they are chronic masturbaters

That's a belief you own

  • 2 weeks later...

I will file this under conspiracy.

I have no idea if this thesis is bs or has any validity.

Too complicated and no time to look into it.

The Globalist Plot to Destroy Germany

3:48 Germany will be bankrupt within five years

7:18 The Green Deal: blowing up Germany's power plants

11:36 Industry in freefall: 15,000 jobs lost a month

12:40 Rearming for war with Russia on borrowed money

20:17 Mass migration: 5 million since 2015

29:23 Governments serving globalists, not their people

41:54 CBDCs, digital IDs and the totalitarian turn

Edited by save the frogs

  • Author

from the man who invented the DISCWORLD...

pratchett on science 503926223_1138828994908463_5486797896545738030_n.jpg

  • Author

from the man who invented the DISCWORLD...

7 minutes ago, kwilco said:

On 6/6/2026 at 3:50 AM, save the frogs said:

I will file this under conspiracy.

I have no idea if this thesis is bs or has any validity.

Too complicated and no time to look into it.

The Globalist Plot to Destroy Germany

3:48 Germany will be bankrupt within five years

7:18 The Green Deal: blowing up Germany's power plants

11:36 Industry in freefall: 15,000 jobs lost a month

12:40 Rearming for war with Russia on borrowed money

20:17 Mass migration: 5 million since 2015

29:23 Governments serving globalists, not their people

41:54 CBDCs, digital IDs and the totalitarian turn

I don’t normal bother to refute conspiracy theories – - they’re just too ridiculous  - it’s the theorists I find more interesting, but I have a slack moment…..

 The "Globalist Plot to Destroy Germany" is not a theory in any scientific sense. It's a conspiracy narrative built from a collection of older myths, political grievances, and selective interpretation of events.

Like most conspiracy theories, it starts with a conclusion ("Germany is being deliberately destroyed") and then works backwards looking for supporting anecdotes while ignoring everything that doesn't fit.

Its supporters typically recycle variations of the "Great Replacement" myth, the so-called "Kalergi Plan," or claims that Germany is secretly controlled by hidden elites. The problem is that none of these claims stand up to serious historical, demographic, political, or economic scrutiny.

Germany's challenges—immigration, demographics, energy policy, inflation, housing pressures, and economic restructuring—are real. But real problems do not automatically prove the existence of a secret global cabal. Complex societies produce complex problems.

The hallmark of conspiracy thinking is the inability to distinguish between "something happened" and "someone secretly planned it."

Ironically, the people who claim to be exposing hidden plots are often the least interested in evidence. Every fact that contradicts the narrative becomes "part of the cover-up," making the theory impossible to disprove and therefore useless as an explanation.

In short, "The Globalist Plot to Destroy Germany" is not a serious analysis of German politics. It's a simplistic fairy tale for people who find reality too complicated.

I'm more interested in why you bothered to post it...

Edited by kwilco

20 hours ago, kwilco said:

I'm more interested in why you bothered to post it...

Because it's a video I was watching. And I'm just trying to get people away from just talking about the moon landing. There's other stuff out there.

Here is the Hungarian Prime Minister making accusations about George Soros.

image.png

Edited by save the frogs

  • Author

42 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Because it's a video I was watching. And I'm just trying to get people away from just talking about the moon landing. There's other stuff out there.

Here is the Hungarian Prime Minister making accusations about George Soros.

image.png

because the topic is conspiracy theorists and not conspiracy theories.... "Why so many conspiracy theorists and what to do about them"

  • Author

It kinda shows the mentality of conspiracy theorists in that they think if they post conspiracy theories, it's relevant to the topic!

On 6/10/2026 at 9:52 PM, kwilco said:

It kinda shows the mentality of conspiracy theorists in that they think if they post conspiracy theories, it's relevant to the topic!

Ok, how about this then?

This is absolutely relevant to the topic.

Her thesis is that conspiracy theorists should NOT be completely ignored and it's perhaps the most eloquent and well-thought out response to your initial question.

Edited by save the frogs

  • Author
3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Ok, how about this then?

This is absolutely relevant to the topic.

Her thesis is that conspiracy theorists should NOT be completely ignored and it's perhaps the most eloquent and well-thought out response to your initial question.

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Ok, how about this then?

This is absolutely relevant to the topic.

Her thesis is that conspiracy theorists should NOT be completely ignored and it's perhaps the most eloquent and well-thought out response to your initial question.

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Ok, how about this then?

This is absolutely relevant to the topic.

Her thesis is that conspiracy theorists should NOT be completely ignored and it's perhaps the most eloquent and well-thought out response to your initial question.

Basically this is a false syllogism - you seem to think that it proves something about conspiracy theorists - it fact it supports the opposite.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.