Trump ostracized at pope’s funeral

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

It isn't irrelevant though is it. Trump supporters making fake memes that have been manipulated.

 

Oh my God, you're still digging!! Twice I have suggested you got irate over a colour manipulated meme (that you don't want to share the source of for some reason) and that you clearly haven't bothered to look up the Fortune article in question. I even gave you a link to it! But no, too much trouble, just make things up instead and blah blah blah MSM blah.

Here's a photo from the article that is too much trouble for you to click on to see if what your meme said was true. All the blues have been cropped out, well and truly, you're so right. Seriously, look at things for yourself and you won't make yourself look like a fool who is making claims about something you haven't even seen for yourself. And again, because you won't read it, the Fortune article even says that other people wore blue. So where is this MSM lie? Just stop digging. On second thoughts, don't, as this is fun.



 

The photo was not fake, I have not looked to verify if the photo in question was doctored, however even if it was it the colour of the suits stays the same, black & blue, which was the topic of the thread

As for getting irate, no, not me, far from it, you need to look back at the wording of comments from other posters.

The MSM lie, was the fact that fortunes original picture cropped out everyone in blue apart from Trump,

[rough diamond]

27 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I wasn't inventing outrage. I was pointing out hypocrisy. All those right wingers who justified the ambush of Zelensky at the White House by saying that his clothing was disrespectful.  They threw hissy fits about Zelensky's attire but so defensive of Trump. There is one Trump supporter on this thread who actually accused Zelensky of stolen valor. Well actually "stolen valour". He spelled valor the British way.

Zelensky's attire is similar to Churchill's "siren suit" which he invented and wore on many formal occasions.  It was his "trademark" War uniform, .  It is the same with Zelensky. 

 

He did on may occasions wear uniform but as he held no active rank in wartime he preferred the Siren suit!

[Nick Carter icp]

11 minutes ago, tilaceer said:

Second picture shows he is slumped, not sitting upright.
Try again.
I would have thought that you would already be embarrassed by what you have posted.
Enough for me.

 

  As I said , I refuse to get into a discussion as to whether a person is sitting up straight or whether he is slumped .

  I really need other things to be doing with my life 

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Zelensky's attire is similar to Churchill's "siren suit" which he invented and wore on many formal occasions.  It was his "trademark" War uniform, .  It is the same with Zelensky. 

 

He did on may occasions wear uniform but as he held no active rank he preferred the Siren suit!

You are comparing little actor Z man to Churchill....haha, 

[rough diamond]

7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

You are comparing little actor Z man to Churchill....haha, 

NO!

I am talking about people complaining about a Country at war's leader wearing his "war attire" in the same way as Churchill wore his Siren suit during WW11 at very high level meetings.

[flexomike]

2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

The OP claimed trump was snubbed by everyone, he wasn't

The OP calimed Trump was the only one wearing a blue suit, he wasn't. 

Another member said the Vatican dress code was black... it wasn't. All 3 claims have be proven to be lies

 

The OP is obsessed with anything he can make up about Trump

[placeholder]

48 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 Names please 

Here's an entire topic dedicated to the issue:

 

[Nick Carter icp]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

Here's an entire topic dedicated to the issue:

 

 

   Thanks for that , now which particular posts are people having hissy fits about Zelensky's clothes ?

[placeholder]

Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Thanks for that , now which particular posts are people having hissy fits about Zelensky's clothes ?

The mods don't like us to name names.

[Nick Carter icp]

Just now, placeholder said:

The mods don't like us to name names.

 

   OK, Could you reply to the posts in the thread and then I will be able to see them ?

[josephbloggs]

12 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   OK, Could you reply to the posts in the thread and then I will be able to see them ?

Seriously, grow up. You know as well as anyone does that there were people on here critical of his dress code at that meeting. Now you want people to trawl through 4-5 weeks of posts to pick out names for you.

You know it happened, why argue it didn't?

[rough diamond]

I dislike Trump and all he stands for but this hounding him over the colour of his suit is just so meaningless!

[Nick Carter icp]

8 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Seriously, grow up. You know as well as anyone does that there were people on here critical of his dress code at that meeting. Now you want people to trawl through 4-5 weeks of posts to pick out names for you.

You know it happened, why argue it didn't?

 

   The claim was that people were having a  hissy fit .

But yeah, better for forget about that claim and move on 

Concentrate the other false claims in this thread  

[metisdead]

A post using vulgar language has been removed:

• You will not post vulgarities, obscenities or profanities.

[placeholder]

32 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   OK, Could you reply to the posts in the thread and then I will be able to see them ?

I've given you the location. I've spent enough time on this already. All you have to do is click on the link and you will see names.

[Nick Carter icp]

6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I've given you the location. I've spent enough time on this already. All you have to do is click on the link and you will see names.

 

  Well yeah, a thread with 300 posts , with spending just one minute to read each post , it would take me five hours to read through the whole thread looking for the golden nugget 

[placeholder]

13 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Well yeah, a thread with 300 posts , with spending just one minute to read each post , it would take me five hours to read through the whole thread looking for the golden nugget 

You could at least look to see who launched it.

[placeholder]

5 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Yes, you mean "Style Icon".

 

Soon everyone will wear blue at funerals.

You and Trump should get a room.

[placeholder]

11 hours ago, BritManToo said:

New World Order leaders have never liked their opposition, it's just the way things are.

 

Well, fictional characters are notoriously sensitive to criticism.

[BangkokReady]

3 hours ago, tilaceer said:

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Trump had his eyes closed .

Closing ones eyes doesn't mean that he's asleep .

You claim that Donald fell asleep and to prove that, you provide a link with the headline .

   The headline doesn't even back up your claim 

 

Did Donald Trump Fall Asleep At Pope Francis’ Funeral? 

 

Expand  

I wasn't using that as proof that Trump fell asleep, just that the incident was reported in some media outlets, unlike what Frank was inferring.
You are correct. Closing your eyes does not mean you are asleep.
But, eyes closed, mouth open and head drooped is a pretty good indication that Trump is away with the fairies.

 

Photos only show a fraction of a second of time.  You're allowing yourself to be fooled by the illusion of a still image making you think that what is seen happened for an extended period of time. 

 

Absolutely everyone, if photographed multiple times while talking, blinking, etc., will produce images where they look totally out of it.

[candide]

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Yes, the reason is called Trump derangement!

He already had 1 term, the planet didn't explode, only litards heads. If the dems hasn't cheated in 2020 he'd be gone now, younonly have yourselves to blame,

 

cheats never prosper

Back to the ridiculous Big Lie conspiracy theory! 

[BLMFem]

2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

You are comparing little actor Z man to Churchill....haha, 

Yes, both are/were honorable men who lead/leads their nations in times of the gravest of crisis, attacked by nations whose leaders were/are some of the most despicable slime the earth ever created.

Hitler and Putin - human filth.

[1sickpuppy]

11 hours ago, papa al said:

Russia won the war

Trump knows

Euro wont admit

idjits

What a dipstick, only thing Russia has won is giving free fertilizer to Ukraine, Ruskies on a slowly sinking ship, sum num nah

[1sickpuppy]

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, both are/were honorable men who lead/leads their nations in times of the gravest of crisis, attacked by nations whose leaders were/are some of the most despicable slime the earth ever created.

Hitler and Putin - human filth.

Sad but true and Maga n Trumps buddies all in bed with Putin, greedy Scumbags, USA now laughing stock of the world, and who voted this idiot in, How stupid are septic tanks

 

 

[1sickpuppy]

4 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, both are/were honorable men who lead/leads their nations in times of the gravest of crisis, attacked by nations whose leaders were/are some of the most despicable slime the earth ever created.

Hitler and Putin - human filth.

Z man has Big Gonads Churchill had none too drunk most of the time had to use Doubles like sputim, slava Ukraine

[1sickpuppy]

13 minutes ago, candide said:

Back to the ridiculous Big Lie conspiracy theory! 

Sew what they reap i used to respect America not anymore, how could any sane person vote for that demented sh-- bag

[tilaceer]

17 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Photos only show a fraction of a second of time.  You're allowing yourself to be fooled by the illusion of a still image making you think that what is seen happened for an extended period of time. 

 

Absolutely everyone, if photographed multiple times while talking, blinking, etc., will produce images where they look totally out of it.

That's a generalisation I disagree with.
So you are postulating that a couple of  quickly taken photographs of anyone supposedly sleeping cannot ever be taken as confirmation that person was asleep ?
Where do you draw the line on what single still image illusion can be taken as proof ?
I suspect the courts would love this as a defence strategy.
He might have only been dozing for a short period of time, but I put faith in the stills taken that represent his state at that time.
Based on his previous shows of ennui when he is at a function that is not about him, he clearly becomes bored, distracted and sleepy.
This theory of "if photographed multiple times while talking, blinking, etc., will produce images where they look totally out of it" was never used by the right, (or left), in defence of Biden.
As I have mentioned multiple times in this thread, there are many pictures of Trump sleeping at official functions, this is no different.
 

[Cameroni]

54 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You and Trump should get a room.

 

Hmmm, a meeting of Titans. Of equals, if you will.

 

He the leader of the United States of America, and me, the leader of Aseannow.

 

You're right this meeting should happen.

 

I am ready. Where is the room?

[placeholder]

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Hmmm, a meeting of Titans. Of equals, if you will.

 

He the leader of the United States of America, and me, the leader of Aseannow.

 

You're right this meeting should happen.

 

I am ready. Where is the room?

I'll book you two the honeymoon suite.

[Cameroni]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

I'll book you two the honeymoon suite.

 

I'll put in a good word for China, don't worry.

 

I know they need all the help they can get, and I do love dim sum.