The COVID Scamdemic and its link to 'Scientism'

[newbee2022]

21 minutes ago, johng said:

Ahh the not fit to stand trial defense  like Biden used ?

No he knew full well what he was doing including trying to cover up the origins.

🤣🤣🤣...and YOU KNOW the origin??🤗🤗🤗

[frank83628]

3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Geez, 🤣🤣🤣🤣 ok, sure

Head of the NIH that was doing gain of function research in Wuhan....the lab it leaked from...or are you still going with a bat at the wet market?

[impulse]

40 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Created COVID 19

 

In fairness, he just approved the funding.  And signed off on the project(s).  Then lied about it.

 

[newbee2022]

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Head of the NIH that was doing gain of function research in Wuhan....the lab it leaked from...or are you still going with a bat at the wet market?

At present we don't have a proof for your assumption of a leak in Wuhan.

Nor we have a proof for the wet market.

[jas007]

30 minutes ago, johng said:

 

Not long enough  to forget yet  80 years  since VE day and they haven't forgotten  nor should we on this subject..the criminals need to be brought to justice and at the vey least admit to their crimes.

I'm all for jail time for the culprits, but how likely is that? It's not just COVID. It's deeper than that. COVID was just part of a larger agenda.  Think depopulation.  There are people who actually think that the world needs to lose seven billion people or more. It's no big secret.  They've been around for decades, but they finally put a plan into action.  

[dinsdale]

3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

At present we don't have a proof for your assumption of a leak in Wuhan.

Nor we have a proof for the wet market.

This is true. No evidence has been found of zoonotic transfer from the wet market and any evidence that may have existed that it leaked from the lab was destroyed by the CCP. Let's add to that that gain of function research on bat viruses was being done in the lab and there is nothing like the Sars-Cov-19 virus in nature. Hmmmm? Wonder which one makes more sense when drawing a conclusion as to the origin.

[newbee2022]

Just now, dinsdale said:

This is true. No evidence has been found of zoonotic transfer from the wet market and any evidence that may have existed that it leaked from the lab was destroyed by the CCP. Let's add to that that gain of function research on bat viruses was being done in the lab and there is nothing like the Sars-Cov-19 virus in nature. Hmmmm? Wonder which one makes more sense when drawing a conclusion as to the origin.

Assumptions, no conclusions

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, johng said:

 

There is no way of knowing if you would have any different symptoms not being jabbed.

Also as pointed out the tests for "Covid" are highly suspect.

IMO the evidence I have, based on the personal experience another poster on here is fond of touting, is sufficient to convince me the vaccinations worked.

 

The test for COVID work as well. Post evidence otherwise.

 

Hypothetical question: In terms of mortality rates, the worst diseases are small pox, measles, diphtheria and polio.

 

If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident?

 

 

 

 

 

 

[dinsdale]

Just now, newbee2022 said:

Assumptions, no conclusions

No these are not assumptions. All I stated is fact.

[frank83628]

19 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

At present we don't have a proof for your assumption of a leak in Wuhan.

Nor we have a proof for the wet market.

Pretty sure the CIA and FBI have confirmed it no?

You sound like you're not bothered, you don't think someone should hold accountability?

You didn't question anything regarding covid, and did what you were told ?

Let me guess, you have all the jabs you were told to get?

I didn't write vaccination, because they weren't, a treatment would be more accurate.

Edit, at present... its been 5 years...the first pandemic in100yrs, that shut the entire world down for nearly 2 years  and America, who claims to have the best intell in the world cannot find the origins.... BULL, they know they full well it was Fauci, as does anyone with half a brain that isn't a stupid sheep.

[frank83628]

18 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

In fairness, he just approved the funding.  And signed off on the project(s).  Then lied about it.

 

He was head of NIH, where does the Buck stop? Who is accountable ?

[newbee2022]

15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Pretty sure the CIA and FBI have confirmed it no?

You sound like you're not bothered, you don't think someone should hold accountability?

You didn't question anything regarding covid, and did what you were told ?

Let me guess, you have all the jabs you were told to get?

I didn't write vaccination, because they weren't, a treatment would be more accurate.

Edit, at present... its been 5 years...the first pandemic in100yrs, that shut the entire world down for nearly 2 years  and America, who claims to have the best intell in the world cannot find the origins.... BULL, they know they full well it was Fauci, as does anyone with half a brain that isn't a stupid sheep.

A confirmation by CIA or FBI is not a proof. 

You can believe conspiracy theories. As I said, it doesn't hurt you or anyone else.

 

[newbee2022]

20 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

No these are not assumptions. All I stated is fact.

Fake facts by Truth Social.

It's ok. 🤗

[dinsdale]

18 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident?

Once again the usual demonizing and completely incorrect conflation to say that those who did not want to be jabbed with mRNA juice must be anti-vaxxers. This is complete rubbish and simply parrots the get jabbed narrative and those that refuse are anti-vaxxers.

[dinsdale]

3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Fake facts by Truth Social.

It's ok. 🤗

Maybe you'll grow up one day. On the way to achieving this great leap in your life you should read this. Never know you might actually learn some things. 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

 

 

[newbee2022]

10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Maybe you'll grow up one day. On the way to achieving this great leap in your life you should read this. Never know you might actually learn some things. 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Maybe you'll grow up one day. On the way to achieving this great leap in your life you should read this. Never know you might actually learn some things. 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

 

 

Oh, I see. Your Bible 🤣🤣🤣. Enjoy🤗

[rattlesnake]

3 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Obviously this is a conspiracy thread and meeting occasion of Alu-Hats.

Have fun.

It doesn't harm anyone. 🤗

 

Others here disagree with you and think we are a danger to society (a problem to which a final solution should ideally be implemented)…

[rattlesnake]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

IMO the evidence I have, based on the personal experience another poster on here is fond of touting, is sufficient to convince me the vaccinations worked.

 

The test for COVID work as well. Post evidence otherwise.

 

Hypothetical question: In terms of mortality rates, the worst diseases are small pox, measles, diphtheria and polio.

 

If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Point b) is erroneous, c.f. Suzanne Humphries and the demonstration that pesticides = "polio" symptoms.