The United Kingdom has experienced a significant drop in its standing on LGBT+ rights in Europe, hitting its lowest rank ever in 2025, according to the Rainbow Map and Index released annually by advocacy group ILGA-Europe. Once a consistent leader in equality for LGBT+ people, the UK has now fallen six places to 22nd out of 49 countries, a stark contrast to its former top-ranking status between 2011 and 2015.

 

The plunge in the rankings follows a recent Supreme Court ruling that defined a woman strictly by biological sex under the Equality Act. As a result, ILGA-Europe deducted all points previously awarded to the UK for legal gender recognition, stating that such recognition “is no longer fully effective.”

 

The group explained, “Legal gender recognition should enable a person to legally function and be recognised in their affirmed gender in all areas of life; this is no longer the case in the UK. The ruling, along with interim guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), means that individuals with a gender recognition certificate are not fully recognised as their affirmed gender in important legal contexts. It is, in fact, impossible for a trans person to be fully legally recognised in their gender identity within the legal framework created by the judgment and interim update.”

 

The UK’s overall score now stands at 45.65 per cent, above the European average of 41.85 per cent but below the EU member average of 51.13 per cent. Malta leads the 2025 rankings with an impressive 89 per cent, closely followed by Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, and Spain. At the other end of the spectrum, Russia came in last with just 2 per cent, followed by Azerbaijan at 2.25 per cent and Turkey at 4.75 per cent.

 

Beyond legal gender recognition, the UK received low marks in several other categories. These include rights for intersex individuals, government guidance advising schools in England against teaching gender identity, and a proposed ban on sex education for children under the age of nine. The country also scored poorly—just 16.67 per cent—for its treatment of LGBT+ asylum seekers, who often face homelessness, abuse, and other hardships upon arrival.

 

Stonewall, a leading LGBT+ rights organisation, described the report as a “wake-up call” for the UK government. “The UK has reached an all-time low position of 22 out of 49. Warm words and empty promises from the government won't restore the UK’s global reputation on LGBTQ+ rights. Action will,” a spokesperson said.

 

Jo Maugham, executive director of the Good Law Project, echoed these concerns and pointed to the broader implications. “Only ten years ago, we were the best in the world in the annual LGBTI Rights Ranking,” he said. “We’re now 22nd and making all the wrong headlines, alongside Hungary and Georgia, for the biggest decline in protections. This is not just an embarrassment abroad – it’s also a tragedy at home for tens of thousands of people struggling to live lives of quiet dignity.”

 

The UK’s dramatic fall in the rankings mirrors similar declines in Hungary and Georgia. Both countries have removed references to “gender identity and expression” from their legislation. Hungary has additionally moved to criminalise participants in Pride events, while Georgia has taken steps to restrict similar expressions of identity.

 

Despite the sharp criticism and declining scores, a UK government spokesperson defended the country's record. “The UK has long championed the rights of LGBT+ people at home and abroad. We proudly uphold a clear and robust expansive legislative framework. We are working to advance the rights afforded to LGBT+ people, including bringing forward legislation to finally ban conversion practices and strengthening protections against hate crime.”

 

Nonetheless, critics argue that such statements are no substitute for meaningful policy changes, warning that without urgent reforms, the UK risks continuing its downward trajectory on the international stage when it comes to equality and human rights.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Independent  2025-05-20

 

 

3 minutes ago, wombat said:

Yeah, that's why the UK's standing has dropped in this index.  Those pesky hackers who targeted the M&S supply chain has interrupted the supply of these sandwiches, and they are slow to recover.

 

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/ms-slow-recovery-cyberattack-puts-it-risk-lasting-damage-2025-05-19/

defining sex has nothing to do with perceived genders. nobody is trying to stop people who perceive their gender to be different from their sex from having rights, but those rights do not give them the right to compete against people of the opposite sex or to use bathrooms used by the opposite sex. their gender is in their head not in mine.

Let's see the ranking after the moslim take over of the UK.

Welcome news.  Those  sports cheats are not receivlng the support they had from the woke mainstream media.  long may it continue. 

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

The United Kingdom has experienced a significant drop in its standing on LGBT+ rights in Europe, hitting its lowest rank ever in 2025, according to the Rainbow Map and Index released annually by advocacy group ILGA-Europe. Once a consistent leader in equality for LGBT+ people, the UK has now fallen six places to 22nd out of 49 countries, a stark contrast to its former top-ranking status between 2011 and 2015.

 

The plunge in the rankings follows a recent Supreme Court ruling that defined a woman strictly by biological sex under the Equality Act. As a result, ILGA-Europe deducted all points previously awarded to the UK for legal gender recognition, stating that such recognition “is no longer fully effective.”

 

The group explained, “Legal gender recognition should enable a person to legally function and be recognised in their affirmed gender in all areas of life; this is no longer the case in the UK. The ruling, along with interim guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), means that individuals with a gender recognition certificate are not fully recognised as their affirmed gender in important legal contexts. It is, in fact, impossible for a trans person to be fully legally recognised in their gender identity within the legal framework created by the judgment and interim update.”

 

The UK’s overall score now stands at 45.65 per cent, above the European average of 41.85 per cent but below the EU member average of 51.13 per cent. Malta leads the 2025 rankings with an impressive 89 per cent, closely followed by Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, and Spain. At the other end of the spectrum, Russia came in last with just 2 per cent, followed by Azerbaijan at 2.25 per cent and Turkey at 4.75 per cent.

 

Beyond legal gender recognition, the UK received low marks in several other categories. These include rights for intersex individuals, government guidance advising schools in England against teaching gender identity, and a proposed ban on sex education for children under the age of nine. The country also scored poorly—just 16.67 per cent—for its treatment of LGBT+ asylum seekers, who often face homelessness, abuse, and other hardships upon arrival.

 

Stonewall, a leading LGBT+ rights organisation, described the report as a “wake-up call” for the UK government. “The UK has reached an all-time low position of 22 out of 49. Warm words and empty promises from the government won't restore the UK’s global reputation on LGBTQ+ rights. Action will,” a spokesperson said.

 

Jo Maugham, executive director of the Good Law Project, echoed these concerns and pointed to the broader implications. “Only ten years ago, we were the best in the world in the annual LGBTI Rights Ranking,” he said. “We’re now 22nd and making all the wrong headlines, alongside Hungary and Georgia, for the biggest decline in protections. This is not just an embarrassment abroad – it’s also a tragedy at home for tens of thousands of people struggling to live lives of quiet dignity.”

 

The UK’s dramatic fall in the rankings mirrors similar declines in Hungary and Georgia. Both countries have removed references to “gender identity and expression” from their legislation. Hungary has additionally moved to criminalise participants in Pride events, while Georgia has taken steps to restrict similar expressions of identity.

 

Despite the sharp criticism and declining scores, a UK government spokesperson defended the country's record. “The UK has long championed the rights of LGBT+ people at home and abroad. We proudly uphold a clear and robust expansive legislative framework. We are working to advance the rights afforded to LGBT+ people, including bringing forward legislation to finally ban conversion practices and strengthening protections against hate crime.”

 

Nonetheless, critics argue that such statements are no substitute for meaningful policy changes, warning that without urgent reforms, the UK risks continuing its downward trajectory on the international stage when it comes to equality and human rights.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Independent  2025-05-20

 

 

Incredible to watch these mentally screwed up people being pushed as something "normal"! Insanity on steroids!!

Why should any group of people, especially those that form a very small proportion of the country, have different rights to any one else?

Looks like Starmer & co are doing something useful after all....

10 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Why should any group of people, especially those that form a very small proportion of the country, have different rights to any one else?

 

Certain groups already have different rights. Practicing Sikhs who ride motorbikes, for example, don't need to wear helmets. The notion that we are all subject to the same rules is a nonsense. 

1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Certain groups already have different rights. Practicing Sikhs who ride motorbikes, for example, don't need to wear helmets. The notion that we are all subject to the same rules is a nonsense. 

If they do then they shouldn't. One rule has to apply to all, no exceptions.

15 minutes ago, harryviking said:

Incredible to watch these mentally screwed up people being pushed as something "normal"! Insanity on steroids!!

 

What is normal? In this case, homosexuality is a deviation from the statistical norm so it could be defined as being abnormal, but the same could be said about ginger haired people or left handed people. Do you harbour an irrational hatred of left handers too?

1 minute ago, Photoguy21 said:

If they do then they shouldn't. One rule has to apply to all, no exceptions.

 

But English Law says different. 

3 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

But English Law says different. 

No it doesn't. It just recently defined that there are only Men and Women. Put a dress on and lipstick does not make you a woman

5 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

No it doesn't. It just recently defined that there are only Men and Women. Put a dress on and lipstick does not make you a woman

 

I am giving you a simple example of where the law provides positive discrimination for a minority. Your initial statement asked why minority groups should have special arrangements made for them under the law and I have explained to you that minority groups have long had special arrangements made for them. It is not a new situation you are getting worked up about. 

Just now, RuamRudy said:

 

I am giving you a simple example of where the law provides positive discrimination for a minority. Your initial statement asked why minority groups should have special arrangements made for them under the law and I have explained to you that minority groups have long had special arrangements made for them. It is not a new situation you are getting worked up about. 

That has to stop. You cant have a society, a functional one that is, with different sets of law for each body. In my opinion they can dress and call themselves what they want but they stick to the facilities of their true biological sex. No taking part in women's sports or bathroom facilities etc.. Further, because they think they are a woman, they cant expect everyone else to refer to them as a woman.

If they don't like it tough luck no one cares. The ruling by the Supreme court judges was correct.

1 hour ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Certain groups already have different rights. Practicing Sikhs who ride motorbikes, for example, don't need to wear helmets. The notion that we are all subject to the same rules is a nonsense. 

That's one example of a difference but how many others are there? I thought our society was based on the idea of equality.

They have the same rights as anyone, but does not include invading women toilets, changing rooms and sports

4 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

What is normal? In this case, homosexuality is a deviation from the statistical norm so it could be defined as being abnormal, but the same could be said about ginger haired people or left handed people. Do you harbour an irrational hatred of left handers too?

 

 

Homosexuality  is also illegal in most countries in the world and is taboo in most religions including Islam & Christianity as outlined in the Bible & Koran. So what has happened is that a vociferous minority have changed the law. They represent less than 10% of the population but manage to disrupt far more disproportionately. The 

"Gay Pride" events held in major cities such as London, Brighton, New York, and now Bangkok are dreaded & hated in equal measure.

I have attended two and was appalled by the scandalous behaviour of some participants.

1 hour ago, Magictoad said:

Homosexuality  is also illegal in most countries in the world and is taboo in most religions including Islam & Christianity as outlined in the Bible & Koran. So what has happened is that a vociferous minority have changed the law. They represent less than 10% of the population but manage to disrupt far more disproportionately. The 

"Gay Pride" events held in major cities such as London, Brighton, New York, and now Bangkok are dreaded & hated in equal measure.

 

There are 195 countries in the world. Homosexuality is illegal in 64 - that's not a majority. 

Religion? Why should people live their lives according to ancient fairy stories? 

Have you canvased all residents of the cities you mentioned to confirm that the events are widely hated? 

 

1 hour ago, Magictoad said:

I have attended two and was appalled by the scandalous behaviour of some participants

 

You were scandalised the first time but you were still compelled to go back a second time? The sounds like the basis of a joke... 

4 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Homosexuality  is also illegal in most countries in the world and is taboo in most religions including Islam & Christianity as outlined in the Bible & Koran. So what has happened is that a vociferous minority have changed the law. They represent less than 10% of the population but manage to disrupt far more disproportionately. The 

"Gay Pride" events held in major cities such as London, Brighton, New York, and now Bangkok are dreaded & hated in equal measure.

I have attended two and was appalled by the scandalous behaviour of some participants.

 

Its not illegal in most countries, but is in all muslim ones

9 hours ago, blazes said:

Looks like Starmer & co are doing something useful after all....

 

Nothing to do with Starmer or his government. The decision was made by the judiciary (Supreme Court).

7 hours ago, proton said:

 

Its not illegal in most countries, but is in all muslim ones

 

And that's relevant to this thread because... why? 

19 hours ago, Photoguy21 said:

Why should any group of people, especially those that form a very small proportion of the country, have different rights to any one else?

Sorry to read you've been out of touch.

Let me catch you up...

The more we empower minorities 

The more they want,

Untill the minorities dictate to the majority.

like now.

2 hours ago, wombat said:

Sorry to read you've been out of touch.

Let me catch you up...

The more we empower minorities 

The more they want,

Untill the minorities dictate to the majority.

like now.

we want equality for everyone but not if it means small groups want to rule the roost. That is never going to happen. I think we agree on that.