FDA requires Covid vaccine makers to expand warning about risk of rare heart inflammation

[connda]

FDA requires Covid vaccine makers to expand warning about risk of rare heart inflammation

Trust the experts!  No problem.  Get your shots and your 7th and 8th boosters.  Safe and Effective.
Caveat:  The CNN article totally defends Covid vaccinations, so no worries. Rare heart inflammation are probably fake news, innit?

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/21/health/fda-covid-vaccine-warning-heart-inflammation

[illisdean]

Yeah, "trust the experts", the only thing you can trust is that the experts and Biden are/was lying.

 

 

 

[Magictoad]

It doesn't worry me. I just want to know where I can get the vaccine in Pattaya?

[impulse]

Anyone interested should follow Sen Ron Johnson's current Senate investigation into the "safe and effectives".  Just hitting the wingnut sites now.

 

Snippet of their coverage, based on released documents:

 

In February 2021, Israeli health officials warned the CDC of “large reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people” following Pfizer injections, just two and a half months after the vaccine received emergency use authorization.

 

By April, the CDC was already reviewing myocarditis data from Israel and the Department of Defense. But instead of alerting the public, they stayed quiet.

 

[blaze master]

2 weeks to flatten the curve.

[save the frogs]

16 hours ago, connda said:

Rare heart inflammation are probably fake news, innit?

 

It could be fake news. Either deliberate or botched up bad science or botched up reporting. 

 

It is extremely difficult to discern fake from real news in this day and age. A formidable task. Hence we are all lost and confused to varying degrees. 

 

There could be fake news on both sides of any agenda, causing even more confusion. 

 

You can hardly believe anything that you don't experience personally. 

 

I had 2 shots because I thought employers would check for it. Then they didn't. I hope to avoid any further shots. But I'm not convinced of any of these alleged risks. 

 

[impulse]

41 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

You can hardly believe anything that you don't experience personally. 

 

I had 2 shots because I thought employers would check for it. Then they didn't. I hope to avoid any further shots. But I'm not convinced of any of these alleged risks. 

 

I had 2 shots and my health and quality of life took a nosedive the day after my 2nd Pfizer.

 

But I don't extrapolate that to the billions of shots that were administered.  For that, we have to depend on honest analysis of millions or even billions of records.  Honesty which has been sorely lacking, for many reasons.  Mostly CYA and greed.

 

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I had 2 shots and my health and quality of life took a nosedive the day after my 2nd Pfizer.

 

But I don't extrapolate that to the billions of shots that were administered.  For that, we have to depend on honest analysis of millions or even billions of records.  Honesty which has been sorely lacking, for many reasons.  Mostly CYA and greed.

 

 

Yeah, good luck getting an honest analysis of billions of records.

 

I don't even trust people's personal anecdotes on AN. Sorry, unless I meet actual people in my daily life and notice a significant pattern, I'm not buying a story from some random dude on AN claiming his health deteriorated after the jab.

 

Honesty is ... a lonely word.

 

 

[impulse]

17 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Yeah, good luck getting an honest analysis of billions of records.

 

The data is there, scattered across hundreds or thousands of databases around the world.  And now there's someone at HHS that actually wants to analyze it.  With help from some database geniuses.

 

Believe me, don't believe me.  I could care less.  But what motive would I have for lying about my 2nd Pfizer?  Contrast that with the "experts" who count on Big Pharma to pay for their research.  Whether directly, or indirectly.

 

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, impulse said:

But what motive would I have for lying about my 2nd Pfizer?

 

Perhaps no motive to lie.

But maybe you "believe" whatever ailment is connected to the jab, when it's coincidental that it happened around the same time.