Police Chiefs Warn Starmer of Crime Fight Crisis Amid Looming Budget Cuts

[Social Media]

 

Police Chiefs Warn Starmer of Crime Fight Crisis Amid Looming Budget Cuts

 

Senior police leaders, including Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, have issued a stark warning to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, cautioning that planned spending cuts could cripple frontline crime-fighting operations. In a direct letter to the prime minister ahead of next week’s anticipated spending review, the UK's most senior police officers outlined the “far-reaching consequences” of Treasury-driven austerity-style reductions, warning that such decisions could force them to abandon investigations into certain crimes altogether.

 

 

The warning comes amid deteriorating negotiations between the Home Office and the Treasury, with the outcome set to determine the future resourcing of both the police and the National Crime Agency (NCA). “We understand that the Treasury [is] seeking to finalise departmental budget allocations this week and that the negotiations between the Home Office and the Treasury are going poorly,” the chiefs wrote in the letter, as reported by The Times.

 

Their concerns point to the impact of a funding model that has already failed to keep pace with rising demands and inflationary pressures. “We are deeply concerned that the settlement for policing and the [NCA], without additional investment, risks a retrenchment to what we saw under austerity. This would have far-reaching consequences,” the letter warned.

 

The police chiefs painted a dire picture of overstretched resources and shrinking capacity. “Policing and the NCA have seen a sustained period where income has not kept pace with demand. Often, this has been masked by attempts to defer costs in the hope of more income in future, but that now leaves policing with very limited room for manoeuvre,” they wrote.

 

The consequences of continued underfunding, they argue, would be unavoidable. “A settlement that fails to address our inflation and pay pressures flat would entail stark choices about which crimes we no longer prioritise. The policing and NCA workforce would also shrink each year.”

 

These warnings arrive as Starmer’s government faces mounting internal tensions over the spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is under growing pressure from within the Labour Party to abandon plans for departmental cuts and instead introduce taxes on the wealthy to shore up public spending. Critics argue that Reeves is veering too close to what some have dubbed “austerity 2.0,” and fear that slashing budgets now will mean discarding key promises made to voters.

 

The dispute has been described by Labour insiders as a “proxy war,” with key departments still locked in budget negotiations just days before the spending plan is due to be unveiled. Among them are Yvette Cooper’s Home Office, which is central to the police funding talks, and Angela Rayner’s Ministry of Housing.

 

As the clock ticks down to the announcement, the tension between the need for fiscal discipline and the pressure to maintain public services is becoming ever more pronounced. For police leaders, the message is clear: without urgent investment, the thin blue line may soon become even thinner.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Independent  2025-06-05

 

 

[JonnyF]

The UK police fight actual crimes? When did this start happening?

 

Perhaps they will have to start sending less than 5 officers to investigate people being rude on WhatApp messages?

 

 

Or perhaps stop sending officers to dance at gay pride events?

 

 

 

[Watawattana]

I took a quick look at police budgets over the last few years.  They seem to have been rising every year, sometimes due to council tax increases.  But not rising at a rate that covers the changing priorities enforced on them by the politicians (e.g. JonnyF's post), the increase in UK population and the additional crimes that that has brought, and the general decline in public behaviour who know they are likely to get away with it as there isn't enough police and the CPS/courts is a fundamentally broken system.  The UK is in a tailspin.

 

 

[SunnyinBangrak]

Wonder if deep down the political elite regret smashing the Brits social cohesion? Import it, become it, censor mention of it, then finally admit you can't police it🤣

[JonnyF]

25 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

I took a quick look at police budgets over the last few years.  They seem to have been rising every year, sometimes due to council tax increases.  But not rising at a rate that covers the changing priorities enforced on them by the politicians (e.g. JonnyF's post), the increase in UK population and the additional crimes that that has brought, and the general decline in public behaviour who know they are likely to get away with it as there isn't enough police and the CPS/courts is a fundamentally broken system.  The UK is in a tailspin.

 

 

 

Where's the section in there for policing thought crimes, non crime hate incidents, free speech and rude posts/messages on social media? I'd have thought that would be huge. 

 

Maybe that falls under "National Priorities"?

[Thingamabob]

Rowley is an incompetent clown. The UK police, including the London Met,  mostly gave up fighting crime already. Instead of being a force they have become a pathetically inadequate social service.

[FlorC]

45 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Rowley is an incompetent clown. The UK police, including the London Met,  mostly gave up fighting crime already. Instead of being a force they have become a pathetically inadequate social service.

Isn't Rowley that old guy from Benny Hill ?

[mikeymike100]

UK police spent approximately 60,000 hours in 2024 investigating non-crime hate incidents related to social media posts. Hate crime investigations (140,561 cases in 2023–2024) likely consume ~1.4 million hours annually (rough estimate, 10 hours per case), with longer resolution times (e.g., 37 days for some offenses).

 

In the UK, for the year ending June 2024, 11% of serious crimes—specifically violent and sexual crimes like rape, assault, grievous bodily harm, and stalking—were solved, meaning they resulted in a charge, summons, or out-of-court outcome (e.g., caution). This leaves 89% unsolved, closed without a suspect identified or charged.

 

In the United States, the solve rate (or clearance rate) for serious crimes, specifically violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault), was approximately 36.7% in 2022, according to FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) data. This means that 63.3% of violent crimes went unsolved. For 2023, data is less complete, but trends suggest similar or slightly improved rates for some crimes.

 

So maybe , just maybe, if the police, in the UK,  concentrated on serious crime, put these officers out on the street instead of sitting behind a desk and computer, they wouldn't need so many more resources!

 

 

[JonnyF]

17 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

In the United States, the solve rate (or clearance rate) for serious crimes, specifically violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault), was approximately 36.7% in 2022, according to FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) data. This means that 63.3% of violent crimes went unsolved. For 2023, data is less complete, but trends suggest similar or slightly improved rates for some crimes.

 

It always amazes me when you see these "true crime" shows based in the states and the cops show up within about 10 minutes of the 911 call.

 

In the UK, you're lucky if they turn up within 10 hours. Or even turn up at all. Often they just want you to sign the paperwork so they can get back to the station. There is no real investigative work done. 

 

The UK police are pathetic. Unless your a pensioner who writes something on FaceBook that isn't sufficiently Liberal/Progressive of course. Then there's 5 of them going through your stuff commenting on your reading material being a bit "Brexity". 

 

https://www.gbnews.com/news/police-officer-thought-police-harry-miller-fumes