Report Thai Schoolboy Allegedly Uses AI to Create and Share Nude Images of Classmates

[Cameroni]

4 minutes ago, simon43 said:

  How you can defend his position is beyond my understanding

 

Because it's not child porn!!! It's just fantasy art! It's not real!

 

I'm aware of the legal position, but the law is obviously wrong in this case. It's creating a fake construct for policy reasons.

 

AI images are not real. How can it be "child porn"?  It's fake!

[TimBKK]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

Because it's not child porn!!! It's just fantasy art! It's not real!

 

I'm aware of the legal position, but the law is obviously wrong in this case. It's creating a fake construct for policy reasons.

 

AI images are not real. How can it be "child porn"?  It's fake!

I think we found the AI kid’s dad

[NoDisplayName]

15 hours ago, Cameroni said:

How is this a "disturbing" incident? The images are not real. It's FAKE. It's not like he forced the girls to do the acts depicted in the FAKE photos.

 

Again, these are FAKE images. Not real.

 

Are we going to send people to prison for fantasy and FAKE images now?

 

Do me favour.

 

South Korea has the answer.

 

Johnny Somali Guaranteed Prison Time in South Korea After AI Deepfake Scandal

The controversial American live streamer, notorious for his brazen antics and public disruptions, is now guaranteed to face prison time in South Korea. A fifth and most severe charge violating the country’s Special Act on Sexual Violence Crimes has obliterated any remaining hope for leniency.

..

Prosecutors revealed that Somali is now facing charges for violating South Korea’s Special Act on Sexual Violence Crimes. The charge stems from an AI-generated deepfake video that depicted popular Korean streamer BongBong in fabricated intimate scenes with Somali.

Under South Korean law, the creation, distribution, or possession of non-consensual AI-generated explicit content is classified as a sexual crime. Legal experts have confirmed that this offense carries a mandatory prison sentence of up to seven years.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/johnny-somali-guaranteed-prison-time-222406985.html?guccounter=1

[richard_smith237]

5 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Obviously fake.

 

But it doesn't matter how realistic they are. Fake is Fake! It's not real!

 

You would punish someone over pixels? That depict things that are not real?

 

Seriously?

 

Yes........ we already do with slander and libel...    

[Celsius]

Remember how 10-15 years ago, many of your family and friends swore they'd never post anything on Facebook?
 

You thought they were really odd, but here we are. The criminal Zuck owns all that you ever posted including your kids and pets. Be ready for those images to be harvested by AI.

[Purdey]

I agree with some who understand these are fake photos, created as the result of a fetid child mind. Put him into psychiatric care for a few months but not prison, where worse criminals will abuse him physically.

[Freddy42OZ]

11 hours ago, simon43 said:

You really have no idea of how realistic images can be when created by AI.

 

Tell me, is this image of a 20 year old female tennis player real or fake?

 

 

Fake

[gravity101]

23 hours ago, Presnock said:

I am not sure what you mean as there can only be one sided against the kid producing the photos/videos and still doing it and showing no remorse.  

Well that's the whole point isnt it. That's one side of the story by it's very definition. Who said he had no remorse? Who said he carried on doing it? Hell we dont even know how old he is! Hey I'm not defending him by any means, but kids are kids and we dont know the other side at all.

[Cameroni]

6 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Yes........ we already do with slander and libel...    

 

Only if it is shown that they caused harm.

[Cameroni]

7 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

Under South Korean law, the creation, distribution, or possession of non-consensual AI-generated explicit content is classified as a sexual crime. Legal experts have confirmed that this offense carries a mandatory prison sentence of up to seven years.

 

Lol, this is is insane!

 

The world is turning mad. 

 

How are fake AI images a "sexual crime"? They depict scenes that are not real. 

 

We can't distinguish between reality and fantasy now?

 

Surely this is a clear sign the world has gone mad.

[simon43]

"How are fake AI images a "sexual crime"? They depict scenes that are not real"

 

The important point is that fake AI images are often believed by the viewer to be real images - the image-creation software is so good.

 

If you see a 'photo' of President Trump fighting a T-Rex dinosaur, then you know that it is fake.  If you see a 'photo' of a clearly-underage naked girl, does it matter if it's made by AI or a genuine photo? It's still child porn and therefore illegal in many jurisdictions.

[richard_smith237]

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

9 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Yes........ we already do with slander and libel...    

 

Only if it is shown that they caused harm.

 

And you think posting a lifelike naked AI photo of a school child is not going to cause any harm ???

 

... The damage to their mental well being can be devastating...   plenty of harm caused.

 

The little cretin bulling girls like this needs to be dealt with now... 

[richard_smith237]

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Lol, this is is insane!

 

The world is turning mad. 

 

How are fake AI images a "sexual crime"? They depict scenes that are not real. 

 

We can't distinguish between reality and fantasy now?

 

Surely this is a clear sign the world has gone mad.

 

No...  but this is a clear sign you are looking at the issue from a myopic perspective. 

 

As mentioned earlier: At a well known school in Bangkok, two girls had their faces photo shopped on a the naked bodies of young women... I've no idea how 'well' this was carried out as I never saw the photo's - however, the photos spread, damaged the reputations of the girls... Mud sticks whether its accurate or not.

The boy was expelled, I think police charges were filed. The girls moved to a different school.

 

 

What's mad to me is any 'adult' not understanding the harm such behavior can do.  

AI produces lifelike images now, and whether an image is genuine or not reputations can be damaged, harm can be caused, and ridicule is the intent...     

 

 

 

Imagine you had a 15 year old daughter and some cretin is using AI to super impose real photos of girls faces onto naked bodies and circulating them on social media - I don't know any father who wouldn't be in that school demanding heads to roll.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[fredwiggy]

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Lol, this is is insane!

 

The world is turning mad. 

 

How are fake AI images a "sexual crime"? They depict scenes that are not real. 

 

We can't distinguish between reality and fantasy now?

 

Surely this is a clear sign the world has gone mad.

 We all see images of all kinds of women that are legal age posted online, but these are innocent schoolgirls who need a chance to stay innocent, especially when many of their peers are acting the whore for attention. Girls here are attacked in school at one of the highest rates worldwide. It's not that they are fake. It's that the real girl's faces are put on porn images that's illegal, especially if they post them online. Girls have enough trouble here with the second class citizen demeaning, and at those ages, fitting in means everything, and is one reason some take their own lives. This embarrassment can hurt some to the core. Think if this was your daughter how would you feel and react. I know what I would do. Edit: Beat me to it Richard.

[simon43]

2 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

 We all see images of all kinds of women that are legal age posted online, but these are innocent schoolgirls who need a chance to stay innocent, especially when many of their peers are acting the whore for attention. Girls here are attacked in school at one of the highest rates worldwide. It's not that they are fake. It's that the real girl's faces are put on porn images that's illegal, especially if they post them online. Girls have enough trouble here with the second class citizen demeaning, and at those ages, fitting in means everything, and is one reason some take their own lives. This embarrassment can hurt some to the core. Think if this was your daughter how would you feel and react. I know what I would do. Edit: Beat me to it Richard.

Agree with all the above.  My previous comments are from the perspective of a school teacher (and father).  This isn't some minor offence by the boy - it can cause serious and lasting mental harm to those girls.

[fredwiggy]

13 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Agree with all the above.  My previous comments are from the perspective of a school teacher (and father).  This isn't some minor offence by the boy - it can cause serious and lasting mental harm to those girls.

Exactly. If you have kids, you're more aware of the predators that are out there and how they manipulate the young. Children that do these things have learned it somewhere, and it usually starts at home, watching a dad that didn't treat their mom well, cheated on her, and they go into the world thinking women are to be used. sadly it's a common theme here.

[Cameroni]

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

And you think posting a lifelike naked AI photo of a school child is not going to cause any harm ???

 

... The damage to their mental well being can be devastating...   plenty of harm caused.

 

The little cretin bulling girls like this needs to be dealt with now... 

 

They're all little cretins. You don't think the girl will just get annoyed and continue with her life? 

 

I think so. There is no harm in these things, like with defamation, slander or libel, where somebody could lose a lucrative role in a film, a book deal or some other important contract because their reputation was tarnished. 

 

What physical or psychological harm would these very young girls suffer?

 

They would just get on with their life.

 

It's all blown out of all proportion. The're just fantasy pics, not even real.

[Cameroni]

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

damaged the reputations of the girls.

 

Lol, what reputation can 15 year old girls have, pray tell?

 

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

The boy was expelled, I think police charges were filed. The girls moved to a different school.

 

If that's true, that was way too harsh and a clear overreaction.

 

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

AI produces lifelike images now, and whether an image is genuine or not reputations can be damaged, harm can be caused, and ridicule is the intent... 

 

But these images are nevertheless not real. And these girls at 15 years of age can hardly have a reputation to tarnish. Sure, they may be ridiculed and teased for a short time. But that will pass.

 

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Imagine you had a 15 year old daughter and some cretin is using AI to super impose real photos of girls faces onto naked bodies and circulating them on social media - I don't know any father who wouldn't be in that school demanding heads to roll.

 

Yes, I might ask the boy get a slap on the wrist, but I wouldn't want him expelled or have police charges filed! That's totally OTT.

[Cameroni]

2 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

We all see images of all kinds of women that are legal age posted online, but these are innocent schoolgirls who need a chance to stay innocent, especially when many of their peers are acting the whore for attentio

 

We don't know if these girls were so innocent, but even if they were, they still are then, it's not like this boy made them do these acts in real life! These are just AI pics, fake pics!

 

2 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Think if this was your daughter how would you feel and react. I know what I would do.

 

I would just ask the school to sanction the boy in some way, but not to expel him or get the police on him. AI pics that are like fantasy digital art are not that serious an offence. Seven years prison for that is quite frankly insane.

 

 

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

We don't know if these girls were so innocent, but even if they were, they still are then, it's not like this boy made them do these acts in real life! These are just AI pics, fake pics!

 

 

I would just ask the school to sanction the boy in some way, but not to expel him or get the police on him. AI pics that are like fantasy digital art are not that serious an offence. Seven years prison for that is quite frankly insane.

 

 

He has the beginning of a sexual predator if he looks at women that way, to be ridiculed. Girls are all innocent until they are abused or molested. Then they go into the world thinking they aren't worthy and end up in serial relationships with men who use them, allowing it to happen thinking they deserve it.

 

The girls in this case are innocent. The boy isn't. He posted fake porn images with their faces which is against the law. This can damage a girl's self esteem so much it can ruin her adulthood.

 

If this was the US, the boy would be definitely held accountable, depending on his age, but unlike here, where the young can get away with almost anything, he would have a record that would only be closed when he went a certain time without any other charges, and would also have to be evaluated by a psychiatrist to see why he's doing this. This isn't a prison offense but it's still something that needs to be stopped before it escalates into more serious offenses, as letting him get away with a slap on the wrist shows him he can do it again with no accountability.

 

Some girls can blow this off, not thinking much of it and let it go, but some can be damaged by it, especially if her peers start laughing at her where she won't want to show her face again. Teaching this boy a lesson is a no brainer, but if he comes from a family where women are victims, it will take a lot of counseling and still may not work. 

[Cameroni]

18 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

He has the beginning of a sexual predator if he looks at women that way, to be ridiculed.

 

Sorry, but it's a giant chasm between ridiculing girls and being a sexual predator. Two very different things.

 

19 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

and end up in serial relationships with men

 

That will probably happen anyway, it's inevitable.

 

19 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

This can damage a girl's self esteem so much it can ruin her adulthood

 

I doubt it very much.

 

20 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

If this was the US, the boy would be definitely held accountable, depending on his age, but unlike here, where the young can get away with almost anything, he would have a record that would only be closed when he went a certain time without any other charges, and would also have to be evaluated by a psychiatrist to see why he's doing this.

 

Which like 7 years in S Korea is completely over the top.

 

21 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

but some can be damaged by it,

 

In what way? They're 15.

[balo]

This is just the beginning.  Anyone can do this and probably get away with it.  I feel sorry for the girls but unless the government actually do something this will just carry on forever. 

[fredwiggy]

17 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Sorry, but it's a giant chasm between ridiculing girls and being a sexual predator. Two very different things.

 

 

That will probably happen anyway, it's inevitable.

 

 

I doubt it very much.

 

 

Which like 7 years in S Korea is completely over the top.

 

 

In what way? They're 15.

Of course not all those who ridicule girls end up as predators but those that start out looking at girls as marks take a lot of counseling to turn the other way.

 

Girls that end up in serial relationships with men inevitably had a distant or abusive relationship with their fathers, who never taught them how to relate to a man showing them by example how her mom was treated. They go into adulthood not knowing what to look for, fantasizing about that absent father and hoping for the perfect man that doesn't exist.  They nitpick even decent men, looking for faults when they are just being a man,as all men have some shared traits.

 

When self esteem takes a hit, it can take a long time to recover from it, or never. It's what makes a person shine, with confidence, and with a girl, not needing to fall for the first boy she meets because he knows how to BS her, but to wait for a decent man that won't be there just to use her. Independent women who had a close relationship with their dads are less likely to fall for players BS.

 

15 isn't too young to understand how to treat a woman, and if they never saw it with their dads growing up, all they have to go by is their peers , who more than likely haven't a clue themselves. The most important years of anyone's life is ages 0-5. The second most important is 5-17. What a child sees in those years is what makes him when he turns into an adult. Past history is a good indicator of future behavior, and this line tells a lot.........."Despite his father's willingness to let legal processes unfold, the boy showed no sign of remorse, continuing his activities even after the school became aware of the issue"..............This is a boy that's going to end up in jail or dead, unless a professional intervenes that knows what they're doing.

[richard_smith237]

48 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

damaged the reputations of the girls.

 

Lol, what reputation can 15 year old girls have, pray tell?

 

A young girl’s reputation is integral to her mental wellbeing. If you can’t grasp that simple truth, you’re clearly too entangled in the defence of your own foolish remarks to engage in anything resembling intelligent discourse.

 

 

48 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

The boy was expelled, I think police charges were filed. The girls moved to a different school.

If that's true, that was way too harsh and a clear overreaction.

 

Not thought so by other parents, the police or the school itself.

 

 

48 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

AI produces lifelike images now, and whether an image is genuine or not reputations can be damaged, harm can be caused, and ridicule is the intent... 

But these images are nevertheless not real. And these girls at 15 years of age can hardly have a reputation to tarnish. Sure, they may be ridiculed and teased for a short time. But that will pass.

 

To excuse this as harmless because the images 'aren’t real' is the height of intellectual dishonesty. The psychological toll is real. At 15, a girl’s identity, confidence, and social standing are still being shaped - precisely when reputation is most fragile.

 

To suggest these girls have no reputation to damage is as absurd as it is cruel. Ridicule and humiliation at that age don’t simply 'pass' - they linger, often deeply and permanently, especially in a digital landscape where nothing is ever truly erased.

 

Your remarks betray a disturbing disconnect from reality, as if teenage girls exist in a vacuum, unaffected by peers, perception, or shame. This isn’t just naïve its truly ignorant. 

 

 

48 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Imagine you had a 15 year old daughter and some cretin is using AI to super impose real photos of girls faces onto naked bodies and circulating them on social media - I don't know any father who wouldn't be in that school demanding heads to roll.

Yes, I might ask the boy get a slap on the wrist, but I wouldn't want him expelled or have police charges filed! That's totally OTT.

 

A 'slap on the wrist'? For generating sexually explicit imagery of underage girls ?...   using their REAL faces.

 

That response reeks of indulgence towards perpetrators and contempt for victims. This isn’t harmless mischief - it’s a form of sexualised digital assault. To shield the boy from serious consequences while the girl is left to carry the weight of public shame, humiliation, and potential lasting psychological harm is a grotesque inversion of justice.

 

Claiming police involvement or expulsion is 'over the top' only exposes a breathtaking ignorance of the gravity of what’s been done.

 

If creating fake nude images of minors doesn’t warrant real consequences, what exactly would? This kind of minimising attitude is precisely why victims so often suffer in silence - and why abusers learn they can get away with it.

 

If no action is taken - society has taught this boy and everyone else that they can get away with such actions.

If no action is taken - society has victims and everyone else that they have no voice.

 

 

Meanwhile, you are teaching us (the forum collective) that your thought processes in such matters are fundamentally flawed to the point of being somewhat disturbed.

 

[richard_smith237]

15 minutes ago, balo said:

This is just the beginning.  Anyone can do this and probably get away with it.  I feel sorry for the girls but unless the government actually do something this will just carry on forever. 

 

Thats the point - laws must evolve with technology, because the nature of harm has evolved.

What might once have been dismissed as ‘just images’ now constitutes psychological assault, repetitional destruction, and social exile - all digitally scaled and enduring.

 

The example I cited (from a School in Bangkok) was of a firm but measured response: serious, instructive, and preventative. That boy, and everyone around him, learned a line had been crossed - and crucially, they didn’t cross it again.

 

And that’s the point. In that school (example I used), action worked. In this case, over twenty girls were targeted. Repeatedly. That’s not a failure of teenage judgement - that’s a failure of the system to protect, to act, and to send a clear message that digital sexual misconduct has consequences.

 

When leniency is chosen over accountability, we don't just excuse the first offence - we invite the next......

 

 

[Cameroni]

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Of course not all those who ridicule girls end up as predators but those that start out looking at girls as marks

 

Look let's keep our feet on the ground here. This boy made some explicit digital art. Rather than making him out to be some sexual predator, perhaps we should nourish his IT talent instead of nipping it in the bud, just redirect it.

 

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Girls that end up in serial relationships with men inevitably had a distant or abusive relationship with their fathers, who never taught them how to relate to a man showing them by example how her mom was treated. They go into adulthood not knowing what to look for, fantasizing about that absent father and hoping for the perfect man that doesn't exist.  They nitpick even decent men, looking for faults when they are just being a man,as all men have some shared traits.

 

I have dated a fair number of girls in Thailand and Phil, I would guesstimate that at leasat 98% were serial daters. It's a majority of the female population. Of course social media and dating apps have a lot to do with it.

 

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

When self esteem takes a hit, it can take a long time to recover from it, or never

 

But at 15 there's a pretty good chance she'll have plenty of time to build up her self esteem. Hopefully not with sexy dance videos on Tik Tok.

 

 

 

 

[Cameroni]

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

A young girl’s reputation is integral to her mental wellbeing. If you can’t grasp that simple truth, you’re clearly too entangled in the defence of your own foolish remarks to engage in anything resembling intelligent discourse.

 

It was a simple question, what reputation have 15 year olds built up? Spare me your sanctimonious nonsense.

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

The psychological toll is real. At 15, a girl’s identity, confidence, and social standing are still being shaped -

 

So she'll have plenty of time to build her confidence and social standing.

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

unaffected by peers, perception, or shame. This isn’t just naïve its truly ignorant. 

 

Nobody's saying they're "unaffected" what I'm saying is that the relatively minor shocks to their self esteem will pass fairly quickly at that age.

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

For generating sexually explicit imagery of underage girls ?..

 

Generating FAKE sexual images of acts that never happened!

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

This isn’t harmless mischief

 

Pretty much, it's almost harmless.

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

it’s a form of sexualised digital assault.

 

Lol "digital assault", now you've jumped out of the bush, lol.

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Claiming police involvement or expulsion is 'over the top' only exposes a breathtaking ignorance of the gravity of what’s been done.

 

No to involve police and demand expulsion is fantastically over the top. You want to ruin a buy's life at 15 because he created a fake nudie pic? What are you crazy?

 

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

If creating fake nude images of minors doesn’t warrant real consequences, what exactly would?

 

Real acts would, fake imagery should warrant minor disciplinary action at most. By theschool. Not police.

16 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

your thought processes in such matters are fundamentally flawed to the point of being somewhat disturbed.

 

I think your thought processes are fundamentally disturbed if you want to ruin a 15 year old boy's life with school expulsion and police, because he created some fake digital nudie pics. That's insane.

[Liverpool Lou]

On 6/7/2025 at 8:14 AM, hotchilli said:

Lets see if he finds being prosecuted in a court of law amusing.

He's a minor.

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Look let's keep our feet on the ground here. This boy made some explicit digital art. Rather than making him out to be some sexual predator, perhaps we should nourish his IT talent instead of nipping it in the bud, just redirect it.

 

 

I have dated a fair number of girls in Thailand and Phil, I would guesstimate that at leasat 98% were serial daters. It's a majority of the female population. Of course social media and dating apps have a lot to do with it.

 

 

But at 15 there's a pretty good chance she'll have plenty of time to build up her self esteem. Hopefully not with sexy dance videos on Tik Tok.

 

 

 

 

Like I mentioned, deviation starts at home. We don't know anything of this boy's family history and can't assume it was a positive one, seeing his actions here. He is simply breaking the law, and doing possible long term damage to at least some of these girls. I didn't say he was a sexual predator, but this type of behavior is how predators start. It isn't normal behavior to post images of girl's faces on nude models, AI or not, as it's still the same thing. He's looking at girls to be ridiculed, sexualized, and not in his mind but in online images which anyone can access, including her friends and family. Of course it's normal to fantasize, but it's a private thing and no one's business besides a willing partner.

 

Serial daters isn't the same thing as serial lovers. Not near. Dating is necessary to learn to relate to others of the opposite sex. Having sex with them confuses things, and has many doing things they shouldn't do, and sometimes it leads to unwanted pregnancies or STD's. And only a man can use a woman for sex, and they usually pay the price, meaning the woman. Trading partners like underwear ruins thinking, especially for those who are tossed aside like an empty bottle.

 

Self esteem starts at birth, and is strengthened with family, and then friends. By 15 she is still trying to find her place, and when peers ridicule her, use her, or diss her, her self esteem is shattered and may never recover. teen suicides are very high, and this is one reason they happen. Being a loner can be dangerous. People can take their own lives or take revenge, killing innocents from that pent up anger from not being able to fit in. Thinking no one loves them or cares.

[richard_smith237]

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

A young girl’s reputation is integral to her mental wellbeing. If you can’t grasp that simple truth, you’re clearly too entangled in the defence of your own foolish remarks to engage in anything resembling intelligent discourse.

 

It was a simple question, what reputation have 15 year olds built up? Spare me your sanctimonious nonsense.

 

This is clearly one of those "if it has to be explained to you then you'll never get it anyway" scenarios....  

 

At 15, a girl's reputation is her social currency – respect, dignity, and trust among peers.
Being sexualised by AI fakes shatters that fragile identity in the most public, humiliating way.
To claim she has no reputation to tarnish is ignorant at best, callous at worst.

 

My response towards you isn't sanctimony... its direct judgement of the depravity of your thought process !

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

The psychological toll is real. At 15, a girl’s identity, confidence, and social standing are still being shaped -

 

So she'll have plenty of time to build her confidence and social standing.

 

Mud sticks, damage can be lasting. Confidence and social standing aren’t built in a vacuum - they’re shaped by how others treat you. Being publicly humiliated at 15 can leave scars that time alone won’t heal.
Telling her she’ll "recover later" ignores the real damage done now.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

unaffected by peers, perception, or shame. This isn’t just naïve its truly ignorant. 

 

Nobody's saying they're "unaffected" what I'm saying is that the relatively minor shocks to their self esteem will pass fairly quickly at that age.

 

Relatively minor shocks? Spreading fake nude images of teenage girls isn’t a minor shock - it’s a violation with lasting impact.
At 15, wounds to self-esteem don’t just ‘pass’ - they can shape mental health, trust, and relationships for years to come.

 

Dismissing this pain as fleeting reveals your lack of understanding about real emotional harm.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

For generating sexually explicit imagery of underage girls ?..

 

Generating FAKE sexual images of acts that never happened!

 

No - the girls faces are not faked, they were superimposed on the images of naked women using AI to 'merge' the image i.e. like photoshopping a face onto something else. 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

This isn’t harmless mischief

 

Pretty much, it's almost harmless.

 

“Almost harmless” is a dangerously blind understatement - its like saying your approach to this is 'almost stupid' !!

 

Creating and sharing falsified explicit images of minors is a profound breach of trust and dignity, causing deep, lasting harm.

To call it ‘almost harmless’ is to dismiss trauma inflicted on vulnerable young lives - you are effectively enabling such behavior with your approach. 

 

I hope you are never in a position of authority to respond professionally to such issues.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

it’s a form of sexualised digital assault.

Lol "digital assault", now you've jumped out of the bush, lol.

 

Thats exactly what it is: Its a form sexualised digital assault...    as much as you'd like to downplay such issue.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Claiming police involvement or expulsion is 'over the top' only exposes a breathtaking ignorance of the gravity of what’s been done.

 

No to involve police and demand expulsion is fantastically over the top. You want to ruin a buy's life at 15 because he created a fake nudie pic? What are you crazy?

 

Its not - ask 20 young female victims and their families.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

If creating fake nude images of minors doesn’t warrant real consequences, what exactly would?

Real acts would, fake imagery should warrant minor disciplinary action at most. By theschool. Not police.

 

Further enabling - highlighting your moral disconnect.

 

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

22 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

your thought processes in such matters are fundamentally flawed to the point of being somewhat disturbed.

 

I think your thought processes are fundamentally disturbed if you want to ruin a 15 year old boy's life with school expulsion and police, because he created some fake digital nudie pics. That's insane.

 

Nope...  That boy and others have learned a lesson...   and many others have been protected.

 

That boy can go to another school, others in the same school have also learned that lesson - this won't happen again... until it does and the boys are handled in the same manner reinforcing that this behavior is not acceptable and not tollerated.

 

 

IF you had a 15 year old daughter and this happened, and you found out it had been happening to others all year and nothing had been done about it. If you found out it had happened previously with a 'minor slap on the wrist'.... would you be arguing so forgivingly ?

 

Forgive the gaslighting: but perhaps you think a 'boob grab' at school is also just kids messing and only to be dealt with by a slap on the wrist ?

 

... This faking of the imagery crosses a firm boundary - one the boys knew they were crossing, but did not fear any consequences - if dealt with firmly, other young girls at the same school and others (if a prescient is set) will be protected.