Jump to content

Where would we be if trump didn’t kill the nuclear agreement with Iran


Recommended Posts

Posted

Sometimes I wonder were we would be now if trump had honored the agreement made by thoughtful world leaders.we all know the Iranians are  sick  of the mullas. if the sanctions had been lifted and the mullas acted up they could have been reinstated instantly…..then I think you definitely would have seen the population revolt.they also would have been less likely to supply putin with weapons.less likely to have supported the murdering killers hisbolla terrorists.

I know a lot of what if’s but the fact of the matter is now the only leverage we have left is to make war.If you bomb a people it tends to unite them not divide them….do not conflate or assume I personally support Iran I definitely don’t I just think it was a blunder to scrap the deal we wouldent be here.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tug said:

Sometimes I wonder were we would be now if trump had honored the agreement made by thoughtful world leaders.we all know the Iranians are  sick  of the mullas. if the sanctions had been lifted and the mullas acted up they could have been reinstated instantly…..then I think you definitely would have seen the population revolt.they also would have been less likely to supply putin with weapons.less likely to have supported the murdering killers hisbolla terrorists.

I know a lot of what if’s but the fact of the matter is now the only leverage we have left is to make war.If you bomb a people it tends to unite them not divide them….do not conflate or assume I personally support Iran I definitely don’t I just think it was a blunder to scrap the deal we wouldent be here.

And thats why you Muricans are hated around the world. Seem it hasnt bothered you until 2016-20 and the first few months of 25.

Biden was in the hot seat for 4 years, why didnt he reinstate it?

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You start off with the assumption that;

1. There was an "agreement,

2. Trump  did not honour an agreement

3. There was an agreement made by "thoughtful world leaders".

 

There was NEVER an agreement. There was never any treaty. There was a  Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that was not even signed.  How can you call the JCPOA an agreement when it was not? 

 

JCPOA held that in return for Iran limiting its nuclear activities, sanctions would be reduced. The plan held that the USA would be allowed to verify every 90 days, that Iran was respecting the plan. Israel provided  evidence that Iran was not respecting the  plan conditions. The UAE and Saudi Arabia agreed with Israel and were opposed to the plan. The Trump administration withdrew from the Plan and proposed that a new more appropriate agreement would be used.

 

The "thoughtful" (sic) world leaders who pushed the original plan were more interested in accessing the  oil and gas, and Iran consumer markets than they were in  limiting Iran's nuclear weapons program. India, Singapore,Germany, Netherlands, Turkey, Italy, France, UAE  and South Africa had significant  investments in  Iran prior to the financial sanctions.  All of them except for UAE wanted the financial sanctions lifted. The plan was thoughtful if you mean it was intended to  provide an excuse for these foreign nations to  invest in a despotic human rights abusing  totalitarian state.

 

The only thoughtful person was President Trump who saw the Plan for what it was, a sham and a cover for profiteers.

 

There was an agreement with many signatories there was inspections and verifications trump killed it to stoke the hate in his base.so all the options the agreement would have been available if it was honored are now mute.as usual trump sticking to form is no dealmaker he’s just a bully no more no less.

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
42 minutes ago, Tug said:

There was an agreement with many signatories there was inspections and verifications trump killed it to stoke the hate in his base.so all the options the agreement would have been available if it was honored are now mute.as usual trump sticking to form is no dealmaker he’s just a bully no more no less.

 

You received a complete rebuttal yet keep on digging in. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
34 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

You received a complete rebuttal yet keep on digging in. 

 

 

Because the rebuttal showed a earp vision of facts, written entirely from the Israeli perspective.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Because the rebuttal showed a earp vision of facts, written entirely from the Israeli perspective.

Why not give us the other perspective. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, blaze master said:

 

You received a complete rebuttal yet keep on digging in. 

 

 

Nothing else matters.... everything is Trumps fault

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Nothing else matters.... everything is Trumps fault

Unfortunately many things are.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

In the end, it will come down to this:

 

1. Iran, you can't have nukes. We will make sure.

2. In return, sanctions will be lifted and billions of tasty Dollars and Euros will flow into your country.  

3. The diaspora of Iranian refugees will return and lend their expertise to rebuilding the country.

 

And just like that, Iran can rejoin the community of nations, prosper, and enjoy freedom.  Remove the shackles of the mad mullahs and the Iranian people will see to the rest.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

In the end, it will come down to this:

 

1. Iran, you can't have nukes. We will make sure.

2. In return, sanctions will be lifted and billions of tasty Dollars and Euros will flow into your country.  

3. The diaspora of Iranian refugees will return and lend their expertise to rebuilding the country.

 

And just like that, Iran can rejoin the community of nations, prosper, and enjoy freedom.  Remove the shackles of the mad mullahs and the Iranian people will see to the rest.

Ahhh that’s kinda what we had before this mess with inspections et al with the threat of renewed sanctions if they misbehave…….trumps blunder by Welching on the deal removed all of those points now we have another war.sad 

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Tug said:

There was an agreement with many signatories there was inspections and verifications trump killed it to stoke the hate in his base.so all the options the agreement would have been available if it was honored are now mute.as usual trump sticking to form is no dealmaker he’s just a bully no more no less.

 

In respect to  signatories, I base my position that there were no "signatories" on the  statement of  Secretary of State Kerry's Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Julia Frifield's statement to Congress and to John Pompeo when he was a member of the House of Representatives. She was speaking on behalf of the Secretary of State.

The JCPOA is not a treaty nor an executive agreement and it is not a signed agreement.   Please see her letter     https://hrvoices.org/assets/attachments/documents/11.24.2015.state.dept.letter.jcpoa.pdf

 

I cannot speak to Mr. trump's motives, but I believe he was right. Iran did not  intend to comply with the intent of the   undertaking, and it said so.  Iran's deputy foreign minister said on July 14, 2015 that the recently reached nuclear deal with the world powers did not include limitations on Iran’s weapons capabilities or missile power. "We have told them [the P5+1 world powers] in the negotiations that we will supply arms to anyone and anywhere necessary and will import weapons from anywhere we want and we have clarified this during the negotiations,” Abbas Araqchi told Iranian state TV.

A few days after that  Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reinforced that position,

https://www.timesofisrael.com/irans-deputy-fm-we-told-world-powers-well-keep-arming-our-allies/

 

The Iranians did not consider themselves bound by the agreement.

Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister, said  that the United Nations version of the nuclear deal—which was recently approved by the Security Council—leaves all restrictions on Iran’s ballistic missile program as "non-binding."

https://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-vows-to-buy-weapons-anytime-anywhere/

 

I believe it is unfair to   say that Mr. Trump did not stick to the agreement, when the Iranians were stating within a week of agreeing to the JCPOA, that they did not have to comply. That's why the agreement was a farce.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

In the end, it will come down to this:

 

1. Iran, you can't have nukes. We will make sure.

2. In return, sanctions will be lifted and billions of tasty Dollars and Euros will flow into your country.  

3. The diaspora of Iranian refugees will return and lend their expertise to rebuilding the country.

 

And just like that, Iran can rejoin the community of nations, prosper, and enjoy freedom.  Remove the shackles of the mad mullahs and the Iranian people will see to the rest.

 

The diaspora of refugees  cannot return to iran because the people who forced them out  will still be in power. A large number of the Iranian refugees  faced  death threats from the Iranian government.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

The big chess game is unpredictable with to many players.

 

One move makes a chain reaction we could not forseen

 

No doubt Israel acts like "God's Fist" (philosophical/metaphorically  ment) in Middle East. 

 

A deal with Iran is only worth the paper written on. 

 

 

However Fredric Forsyth had an great book called The Fist of god. Look it up

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fist_of_God

Posted
5 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

The diaspora of refugees  cannot return to iran because the people who forced them out  will still be in power. A large number of the Iranian refugees  faced  death threats from the Iranian government.

Perhaps, it depends on who is in power when this whole kerfuffle is finished. At the least, they might invest in the country if it agrees to basic principles like the rule of law.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Perhaps, it depends on who is in power when this whole kerfuffle is finished. At the least, they might invest in the country if it agrees to basic principles like the rule of law.

 

True, but it requires a purge of the mullahs and the Iranian Guard.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

True, but it requires a purge of the mullahs and the Iranian Guard.

As long as the "West" doesn't try to do it themselves, I am OK with it. Let the people in Iran figure it out for themselves. The Guard has been largely decapitated.  

If they choose to continue under the Islamic State, that is their business. As long as they stop sponsoring terrorists and trying to make an A-bomb.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Briggsy said:

The "agreement" was time-limited so it would have expired by now. 

But it would have been re-negotiated by now.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Sa Kaeo: Wild Elephant Kills Cucumber Farmer Outside Wildlife Sanctuary

    2. 14

      Thailand Live Saturday 21 June 2025

    3. 1

      Army Sergeant Kills Himself with M16 Rifle in Military Quarters

    4. 14

      Thailand Live Saturday 21 June 2025

    5. 74

      Thailand Tightens Rules for Foreign Drivers: Tests Now Mandatory

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...