Jump to content

SIDS - Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - Is Caused By Vaccines


Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

It's mine.

 

There are always risks (quite serious ones) with any form of medical intervention, particularly when an incision is made.

 

It is for me to decide, in the absence of any immediate medical necessity, to have it removed.

 

The benefits of removing it are zero, if you are mentally capable of carrying out appropriate actions re: person hygiene

 

 

I said rational reasons.

 

Anyone would think you are talking about major heart surgery. It's not.

 

Back to the same argument as the anti-vaxxers, I see.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, why do you call people that don´t agree with your view brain-washed? You are running propaganda for telling everyone that vaccines kill, while the fact is that they save more lives than they kill.

Nope, do some independent research instead of simply swallowing what the vax-pushers want you to believe. 

mRNA shots have killed and are still killing and harming many more lives that they 'saved'.  

The truth is slowly but inevitably emerging, despite the billions of US $ of propaganda trying to convince you that they were the best thing since sliced bread.  And the relentless efforts to push ever more new mRNA shots and boosters, are falling flat (except for the cultish believers, that refuse to open their eyes to the reality all around them).

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Magictoad said:

Sudden infant death syndrome not caused by vaccines. The cause of sudden death syndrome is unknown but babies not having their vaccine is a definite cause of death to which you are contributing.

All your conspiracy theories about vaccinations actually harm not just the stupid individuals who believe them but they damage the community and society at large.  Because herd immunity is required.  Now that parents are not giving their kids measles shots we are seeing death by measles for the first time in decades. 

It's a horrible way to go and completely unnecessary given that we have and excellent vaccine to protect against measles. 

Please stop using this platform for your unsubstantiated, crazy ideas. Why don't you take them to a medical forum instead?

POLIO VACCINE has saved so many people from so much pain, misery and death it makes your ramblings look pathetic. 

This is just so uninformed rubbish.

 

''Because herd immunity is required.'' Required for what may I ask?

 

''POLIO VACCINE has saved so many people from so much pain, misery and death it makes your ramblings look pathetic.'' Polio vaxxes never cured, or prevented anything. But they did serious harms all over the world. 

 

Too much MSM for you Sir.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Nope, do some independent research instead of simply swallowing what the vax-pushers want you to believe. 

mRNA shots have killed and are still killing and harming many more lives that they 'saved'.  

The truth is slowly but inevitably emerging, despite the billions of US $ of propaganda trying to convince you that they were the best thing since sliced bread.  And the relentless efforts to push ever more new mRNA shots and boosters, are falling flat (except for the cultish believers, that refuse to open their eyes to the reality all around them).

 

So, apparently you have all the answers, and only you can judge what is true or not when you read. You are ridiculous! 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

This is just so uninformed rubbish.

 

''Because herd immunity is required.'' Required for what may I ask?

 

''POLIO VACCINE has saved so many people from so much pain, misery and death it makes your ramblings look pathetic.'' Polio vaxxes never cured, or prevented anything. But they did serious harms all over the world. 

 

Too much MSM for you Sir.

This isn't MSM but a world renowned health site This an excerpt from it.......................

The ease of administering the oral vaccine made it the ideal candidate for mass vaccination campaigns. Hungary began to use it in December 1959 and Czechoslovakia in early 1960, becoming the first country in the world to eliminate polio.

In 1962, Cuba began to administer the OPV in nationwide immunization programmes. OPV had an added benefit that paved the road to eradication. While IPV protected the vaccinated child, it did not stop the poliovirus from spreading between children. 

OPV, on the other hand, interrupted the chain of transmission, meaning that this was a powerful vaccine to stop polio outbreaks in their tracks..........https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/history-of-vaccination/history-of-polio-vaccination

Posted
8 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I said rational reasons.

 

Anyone would think you are talking about major heart surgery. It's not.

 

Back to the same argument as the anti-vaxxers, I see.

 

Pander to me and explain why all of those are not rational.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, apparently you have all the answers, and only you can judge what is true or not when you read. You are ridiculous! 

The answers are in nature Sir. Where do we come from? We come from the Earth. How do we thrive? But eating food from Earth's supermarket.

 

If you deny nature. You deny yourself. We humans have a destiny. That can be living in a beautiful, and bountiful paradise, or a nightmare.

 

MRNA jabs have no place in our bodies.

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Seriously, did you skip school when they taught history and sciences? For most of human history, infant and child mortality rates were devastating - often 30-50% of children died before age 5, primarily from infectious diseases we now prevent with vaccines. Average life expectancy was around 25-35 years for much of human history, not because people couldn't live longer, but because so many died young from preventable diseases.

 

He'll want a video from the dark ages of people making sworn affidavits to support your outlandish claims.

Posted
Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

The answers are in nature Sir. Where do we come from? We come from the Earth. How do we thrive? But eating food from Earth's supermarket.

 

If you deny nature. You deny yourself. We humans have a destiny. That can be living in a beautiful, and bountiful paradise, or a nightmare.

 

MRNA jabs have no place in our bodies.

 

 

God, although some might disagree he exists, likely has put everything we need here to control the diseases that were all put here, as a learning tool. Who yet knows?

 

Is the earth going to last millions of more years or end soon as some predict? It it was to last a very long time, it could be thought that he really is watching us to see if we can learn how to eradicate the many diseases here. Or it will not last longer, that of course we aren't supposed to live forever, and he's just watching some do their research to try and help others with what they've come up with. Vaccines and medicines.

 

Our destiny isn't to live forever. This is a short part of our existence,nothing compared to the next level of forever. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Do some research, and find out who is the biggest sponsor of the WHO...

USA and Argentina have cancelled their membership to the WHO. 

And Italy has just revoked the latest amendments to the WHO Protocol that would have given that unelected body unprecedented power over health decisions in its member states.

People here do research , and have already come up with a decision. Either take the vaccines or not. No one knows if they need them or not. Millions died before they were invented, some have died from them, and some don't need them, but a person doesn't know their future. A lot of this has to do with profits, people who only care about them, and there's a likelihood they are taking the vaccines also, or had as children. A lot has to do with scientists trying to help others, not looking at cash but saving lives.

Posted
Just now, fredwiggy said:

And you dismiss this and take other's opinions. Where's the difference? 

Not the WHO boss now, but the one before, let the cat out of the bag when she said that only ''30% of WHO funding is guaranteed.'' The rest is given by interested parties. He who pays the piper,,,etc.

 

Trust WHO. 

 

https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/(2018-02-25)-Trust-WHO:0

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

<snip>

 

The WHO!?  '',,,world renowned health site.'' Joke of the year.

 

And yet another two. The Cutter incident aside, where some were paralyzed by the vaccine, until it was further researched which led to a better product, where it saved millions...........https://polioeradication.org/news/the-world-without-vaccines/...............https://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/news/sixty-years-of-the-polio-miracle-vaccine.

Posted
4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Read the links, as someone has you fooled.

I've seen the evidence Fred. And lots of it.

 

Arsenic, Mercury and DDT, the main culprits in the west.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Polio is caused by toxicity. Nothing to do with a virus. It is not transmissible.

 

Polio Is Caused by a Virus — Proven and Isolated

Polio is caused by the poliovirus, a well-documented enterovirus first isolated in 1909 by Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper.

It has been visualized under an electron microscope.

It can be cultured in labs, reproduced in animals, and used to test vaccines (Salk and Sabin).

 

Lab fact: The virus infects motor neurons in the spinal cord → causing muscle weakness or paralysis.

 

Vaccines Eradicated Polio in Many Countries

If polio were caused by toxins like pesticides (as some conspiracies claim), vaccines wouldn’t stop it—but they have:

U.S.: polio eliminated by 1979

Europe: eliminated in 2002

India: declared polio-free in 2014

 

Example: Vaccination → drop to near-zero cases, despite no change in toxin use = strong evidence it’s viral.

 

Polio Occurs in Specific Patterns That Don’t Match “Toxins”

Polio outbreaks are infectious:

Spread through fecal-oral route (contaminated water, poor hygiene)

Clusters in populations with low vaccine coverage

Often begins with mild symptoms (fever, nausea), like other viral infections

 

If toxins caused polio, it wouldn’t spread person-to-person or follow epidemic curves.

 

Toxicity Theory Is Rooted in a Misunderstanding of Correlation

Some early outbreaks coincided with the use of DDT and arsenicals → conspiracy theorists blamed these.

But correlation is not causation:

Polio predates pesticides by decades (19th century outbreaks are well documented).

In toxin-only exposure zones, no polio occurred unless the virus was present.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I've seen the evidence Fred. And lots of it.

 

Arsenic, Mercury and DDT, the main culprits in the west.

I would say sugar, inorganic fertilizers, incompetent doctor prescribing, and overdevelopment. 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The answers are in nature Sir. Where do we come from? We come from the Earth. How do we thrive? But eating food from Earth's supermarket.

 

If you deny nature. You deny yourself. We humans have a destiny. That can be living in a beautiful, and bountiful paradise, or a nightmare.

 

MRNA jabs have no place in our bodies.

 

 

What you state here is only an opinion, unsupported by facts, as well as unsupported by the majority of Earth´s population.

However, with that ideology, you might be able to reform the monkhood. 😂

Posted
2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I take it you have heard of the term "false equivalences".

 

How would you know the pee you emit, and the sex you have, is better than someone who is circumcised?

I don't, I don't care, but I do know we were all usually born with a willy cover, the same as most land based animals, that is a fact.........😋

 

Removal of your willy holster is a man made thing, just like religion.......🤭

Posted
1 hour ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Seriously, did you skip school when they taught history and sciences? For most of human history, infant and child mortality rates were devastating - often 30-50% of children died before age 5, primarily from infectious diseases we now prevent with vaccines. Average life expectancy was around 25-35 years for much of human history, not because people couldn't live longer, but because so many died young from preventable diseases.

And you credit vaccines for the drop in these preventable diseases? 

Do some research and you will find out that in as good as all cases vaccines were only introduced when due to improved sanitation the mortality from the specific disease was already at a very low point.  

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Pander to me and explain why all of those are not rational.

There's a billion Muslims who appear to be physically healthy after circumcision. They are also reproducing faster than us.

 

The death rate from circumcision is very low, and usually associated with co-morbidities.

 

OTOH, penile cancers and UTI's are significantly more common in uncircumcised men.

 

I used to think hysteria was associated with women, MAGA's, and anti-vaxxers. Seems I was wrong.

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, transam said:

I don't, I don't care, but I do know we were all usually born with a willy cover, the same as most land based animals, that is a fact.........😋

 

Removal of your willy holster is a man made thing, just like religion.......🤭

True. Adding fluoride to water is man-made too. It's a public health measure.

 

Why are you so protective of your willy holster? Are you worried about naked foot races through tall sawgrass?

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

True. Adding fluoride to water is man-made too. It's a public health measure.

 

Why are you so protective of your willy holster? Are you worried about naked foot races through tall sawgrass?

Fluoride, indeed, but thankfully it has no effect on anyone's willy, as far as I am aware.

I am not worried about my or anybodies willy, I thought it was being discussed on here.

:sorry:.........

Posted
1 minute ago, transam said:

Fluoride, indeed, but thankfully it has no effect on anyone's willy, as far as I am aware.

I am not worried about my or anybodies willy, I thought it was being discussed on here.

:sorry:.........

A question for you.

 

How many minutes a day do you spend cleaning your willy, and how much does that add up to over a lifetime?

 

Reductio ad absurdums evidently go through to the wicketkeeper on ASEAN.

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

A question for you.

 

How many minutes a day do you spend cleaning your willy, and how much does that add up to over a lifetime?

 

Reductio ad absurdums evidently go through to the wicketkeeper on ASEAN.

 

 

That's a strange question, Malcolm will be proud of you.....😂

And to be honest a daft question.....🤭

But at least you can hang yours out to dry, where I have to be a bit more maticulous with the towel............🤣

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...