Is Angela Rayner guilty

[brewsterbudgen]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'm surprised she hasn't blamed the Tories yet.

 

Lammy is a dunce. A village idiot. Any criticism of him will be deemed racist though. Scary to think if Starmer goes he could be PM. That would be a new low for Britain. 

 

 

Lower than Liz Truss?  Surely not.

[hotandsticky]

3 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Lower than Liz Truss?  Surely not.

 

 

I think you will find otherwise.....or hopefully you won't.

[JonnyF]

42 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Lower than Liz Truss?  Surely not.

 

Did you not see him on Mastermind?

 

Oh that's right ~ you don't watch videos that prove you wrong. 

 

Lammy thinks biological men can grow a cervix after surgery. He thinks Henry VII succeeded Henry VIII.

 

Yes, really. The only reason Starmer appointed him next in line is that it will reduce calls for him to stand aside. 

[SamSpade]

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'm surprised she hasn't blamed the Tories yet.

 

Lammy is a dunce. A village idiot. Any criticism of him will be deemed racist though. Scary to think if Starmer goes he could be PM. That would be a new low for Britain. 

 

 

 

[ChiTownEric]

7 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

She has a nickname already Angela blamer because she blaming everyone for her having to resighn.  As for Lammy he turned up at the whitehouse in a suit with Trainors on.

You must be right - because we all know that nicknames are better than facts

[shackleton]

Yes 😱

[superal]

21 hours ago, JonnyF said:

This is so poetic.

 

After all her calls for others to resign. All her cries about Tory scum. All her speeches about abiding by the same rules as everyone else.

 

And the piece de resistance? Replaced by mastermind DEI Lammy 😄.

 

Could Labour be any more pathetic?

Probably , its just a matter of time . Next Wednesdays PMQT should be interesting  . Also the latest cabinet reshuffle has not touched Reeves . I wonder why ? Could it be that there would are are no candidates who would want to pick up  the mess she has made . Or Starmers reluctance to change his endorsement of her actions ?

[JonnyF]

23 minutes ago, superal said:

Probably , its just a matter of time . Next Wednesdays PMQT should be interesting  . Also the latest cabinet reshuffle has not touched Reeves . I wonder why ? Could it be that there would are are no candidates who would want to pick up  the mess she has made . Or Starmers reluctance to change his endorsement of her actions ?

 

He's waiting for Reeves to deliver the budget raising taxes.

 

Then he will sack her because he is so shocked that she broke Labour’s promises. 😀

 

It's theatre. Or more accurately, Pantomime.

 

[BarraMarra]

It's being reported Rayner will be given a 17k pay off.

[Liverpool Lou]

On 9/5/2025 at 7:10 PM, Bannoi said:

On 9/5/2025 at 6:45 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Who has she been so excessively and unreasonably critical of?

 

The taxpayer for paying her so much she could afford to buy a flat in Hove for £800,000 to start with.

You're saying that she has been excessively critical of the taxpayer?   What?

[Liverpool Lou]

On 9/6/2025 at 1:07 PM, superal said:

She is guilty of tax evasion

No, she is not...yet.   Unless you can link to the court case that found her guilty.

[superal]

19 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, she is not...yet.   Unless you can link to the court case that found her guilty.

      Not paying the correct the correct stamp duty ( tax ) , lying by trying to put the blame on tax advisors . Tax evasion or avoidance ? there is a fine line between the 2 . For some reason she was given an easy ride by the ethics advisor Laurie Magnus .  If not guilty , why did she resign and why did Starmer let her go ? I doubt if Starmer had the balls to sack her . National papers had to tread carefully , being aware of libel .