Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Tells Republicans: Lose Midterms, I’m Impeached

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

donald-trump-2-gty-gmh-260106_1767713137726_hpMain_16x9.jpg

US President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Republican members of Congress: secure victory in the upcoming midterms or risk his impeachment. Speaking at a House GOP retreat held at the newly renamed Kennedy Center, Trump emphasised the potential consequences if Republicans do not maintain their majority. "You've got to win the midterms because if we don't, I'll get impeached," he stated.

During his first term, Trump faced impeachment twice. The first instance was in 2019 over allegations of abuse of power related to pressuring Ukraine's president. The second occurred in his final days following the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, for incitement to insurrection. However, he was acquitted by the Senate on both occasions. Trump highlighted these past impeachments to stress the importance of winning the midterms.

Addressing the GOP, Trump expressed confidence in Republican policies compared to Democratic platforms but acknowledged the historical trend of the president's party facing challenges in midterm elections. He claimed that while Republicans have the right policies, Democrats remain unified. Trump also criticised previous Democratic presidents and jokingly proposed cancelling elections, fully aware that such remarks would provoke media criticism.

The GOP's current slim majority in the House, down to a two-vote margin after recent events, has heightened concerns. Trump offered strong support for House Speaker Mike Johnson, praising his toughness despite the narrowing majority due to recent resignations and deaths.

On healthcare, Trump called for flexibility, particularly concerning abortion restrictions, and criticised the Affordable Care Act. He recommended paying Americans directly to purchase their health care. "Let the money go directly to the people," he urged lawmakers, advising flexibility on the Hyde Amendment, which restricts federal funding for abortion services, reported ABC News.

Key Takeaways:

  • Trump warns midterm losses could lead to his impeachment.

  • He criticises Democrats' policies and urges GOP unity.

  • He emphasises the importance of health care reform and the need for flexibility in abortion laws.

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from ABC News 2026-01-07

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Replies 69
  • Views 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • MikeandDow
    MikeandDow

    One can only hope this idoit is impeached

  • bunnydrops
    bunnydrops

    We have to thank Trump for giving the Democrats another good reason to get out and vote.

  • JimHuaHin
    JimHuaHin

    A good enough reason for Republicans to step aside, and a good enough reason not to vote Republican.

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

New White House website:

President Trump took decisive action to pardon January 6 defendants who were unfairly targeted, overcharged, and used as political examples. They were not protected by the leaders who failed them. They were punished to cover incompetence.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/j6/

  • Popular Post

One can only hope this idoit is impeached

  • Popular Post

We have to thank Trump for giving the Democrats another good reason to get out and vote.

  • Popular Post

A good enough reason for Republicans to step aside, and a good enough reason not to vote Republican.

  • Popular Post

He’s writing the Democrat mid term platform.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, MikeandDow said:

One can only hope this idoit is impeached

So tell the class, what exactly will that do for you ?

Will you eat better, sleep better ? Just what ?

Impeachment is a joke for all sides, its nothing more than a dog and pony show

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Slowhand225 said:

So tell the class, what exactly will that do for you ?

Will you eat better, sleep better ? Just what ?

Impeachment is a joke for all sides, its nothing more than a dog and pony show

as i said Impeachment will get rid of this 'imbecile ' by getting rid of him, and going back to a stable goverment in the states, only then will, america be great again!! America is going backward!!

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

One can only hope this idoit is impeached

that is just half of the equation, as he has rightfully been impeached twice with good cause but.... needs conviction by the senate.... if tried by regular 'jury of peers' he'd be convicted in no time.... Republicans wet themselves when they think they might disagree with Donnie..... but his grip seems to be loosening...

Unless the Dems win a huge majority in the Senate, he won't be convicted.

  • Popular Post
34 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Unless the Dems win a huge majority in the Senate, he won't be convicted.

I’m not so sure about that .he’s losing power he’s making folks on both sides of the aisle nervous .he’s really getting worse I’m thinking he will get canned and it would be really nice if he could occupy the same facility that Maduro is presently at.especially because today is the anniversary of his attempted coup.

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

One can only hope this idoit is impeached

Perhaps unintended, but the misspelling was fitting for your position.

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, Tug said:

I’m not so sure about that .he’s losing power he’s making folks on both sides of the aisle nervous .he’s really getting worse I’m thinking he will get canned and it would be really nice if he could occupy the same facility that Maduro is presently at.especially because today is the anniversary of his attempted coup.

Rhetoric like yours is not productive. There must be specific high crimes and misdemeanors to support an impeachment. Comparing Trump to a corrupt dictator who trafficked in drugs to destabilize the USA and to fund anti American actions is not convincing. If you believe there is a basis for impeachment, fine then what are they? To date, all of his actions have passed the legal tests. In the cases where they did not, the actions were stopped or did not take effect, e.g. deployment of National guard in Chicago.

  • Popular Post

Time to face the music Don, you've overstepped your mark on too many issues, you are NOT a dictator, even though you think you are........🥴

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, Patong2021 said:

Rhetoric like yours is not productive. There must be specific high crimes and misdemeanors to support an impeachment. Comparing Trump to a corrupt dictator who trafficked in drugs to destabilize the USA and to fund anti American actions is not convincing. If you believe there is a basis for impeachment, fine then what are they? To date, all of his actions have passed the legal tests. In the cases where they did not, the actions were stopped or did not take effect, e.g. deployment of National guard in Chicago.

Nonsense he ditcates outside the laws runs amok untle the courts stop him that’s exactly what he’s doing now…….come the midterms we will have more than just the courts holding the line and will be able to check him much much faster.

  • Popular Post
17 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Rhetoric like yours is not productive. There must be specific high crimes and misdemeanors to support an impeachment. Comparing Trump to a corrupt dictator who trafficked in drugs to destabilize the USA and to fund anti American actions is not convincing. If you believe there is a basis for impeachment, fine then what are they? To date, all of his actions have passed the legal tests. In the cases where they did not, the actions were stopped or did not take effect, e.g. deployment of National guard in Chicago.

Unconstitutionally and systemically violating the 1st Amendment and, abusing investigatory and prosecutorial powers will most likely grounds to serve as the basis for articles of impeachment. Trump know that he crossed those lines numerous times and acknowledged that in his warning to House Republicans that he will be impeached if the Republicans lose the midterms.

  • Popular Post
25 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Rhetoric like yours is not productive. There must be specific high crimes and misdemeanors to support an impeachment

AI via Gemini:

A presidential impeachment can be based on a violation of international law, but it is not because international law is "higher" than domestic law. Rather, it is because the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to define what constitutes "high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

If a president violates a treaty or an international norm, Congress can argue that this act constitutes an abuse of power or a violation of the public trust, both of which are foundational grounds for impeachment.

1. International Law as "Law of the United States"

Under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the U.S. Constitution, ratified treaties are considered "the supreme Law of the Land." Therefore, if a president violates a treaty—such as the UN Charter regarding the use of military force—they are technically violating U.S. law.

  • Popular Post
30 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Rhetoric like yours is not productive.

And your post is productive?

31 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Comparing Trump to a corrupt dictator who trafficked in drugs to destabilize the USA

His drugs, if any, did not go to the USA.

32 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

To date, all of his actions have passed the legal tests.

The consensus seems to be his latest actions were illegal to international law. Many other actions are still in the legal process. How about the release of the Epstein files, going according to the law?

  • Popular Post
36 minutes ago, transam said:

Time to face the music Don, you've overstepped your mark on too many issues, you are NOT a dictator, even though you think you are........🥴

Dont think the clown will ever be put in a jail cell, more then likely will be put in a padded cell for his own protection. Basically he is a stark raving lunatic and is only going to get worse by the day.

  • Popular Post
24 minutes ago, stevenl said:

And your post is productive?

His drugs, if any, did not go to the USA.

The consensus seems to be his latest actions were illegal to international law. Many other actions are still in the legal process. How about the release of the Epstein files, going according to the law?

You say that there drugs did not go to the USA. Sure. And the water and aircraft laden with cocaine and other materials on a direct course to theUSA that were intercepted were going where? The people arrested over the past 5 years have provided multiple statements of their intentions. With your statement, you cannot be taken seriously. The superseding indictment alleges that Maduro and other top Venezuelan public officials have, for the past two decades, worked closely with international drug trafficking organizations to ship illicit drugs into the US while enriching themselves. The USA now must prove the its charges. If the charges are shown as unsupported, you can crow, and Maduro can sue for harm inflicted.

There is no consensus that the interdiction was illegal. Multiple legal justifications were provided. The USA will have to support the basis of its actions in court.

This is not about Epstein. There are multiple open threads on the subject. Go argue your conspiracy there. The case against Maduro has been ongoing long before Epstein became a cause celebre.

39 minutes ago, JerryM said:

AI via Gemini:

A presidential impeachment can be based on a violation of international law, but it is not because international law is "higher" than domestic law. Rather, it is because the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to define what constitutes "high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

If a president violates a treaty or an international norm, Congress can argue that this act constitutes an abuse of power or a violation of the public trust, both of which are foundational grounds for impeachment.

1. International Law as "Law of the United States"

Under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the U.S. Constitution, ratified treaties are considered "the supreme Law of the Land." Therefore, if a president violates a treaty—such as the UN Charter regarding the use of military force—they are technically violating U.S. law.

AI is not a solid source for legal advice, especially for complex Constitutional Law cases. There are multiple cases in the UK, USA and Canada where lawyers have been sanctioned for relying on AI for research that was found to be unreliable. I'll stick with what the legal scholars have to say.

  • Popular Post
5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s writing the Democrat mid term platform.

I'm not a doctor but it's obvious Trump has a disease that's very hard to over come.

It's called FIMD ( Foot In Mouth Disease) The oldies here my say he's similar to Errol Flynn, in that everything he touches he f****.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, JerryM said:

1. International Law as "Law of the United States"

Under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the U.S. Constitution, ratified treaties are considered "the supreme Law of the Land." Therefore, if a president violates a treaty—such as the UN Charter regarding the use of military force—they are technically violating U.S. law.

Would seizing the territory of a fellow NATO country (Denmark/Greenland or Canada) and thus violating the NATO Treaty ratified by Congress be doing just that?

  • Popular Post
17 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

AI is not a solid source for legal advice, especially for complex Constitutional Law cases. There are multiple cases in the UK, USA and Canada where lawyers have been sanctioned for relying on AI for research that was found to be unreliable. I'll stick with what the legal scholars have to say.

Sure - the Avianca case being the most famous.

But in these instances all the AI sentences have source links such as this one *. But most people on here I think would rather read of few sentences than source data.

* The President’s actions also brazenly violate the United Nations Charter, a binding treaty which the U.S. has ratified and which prohibits the threat or use of military force against any nation except in self-defense or as authorized by the Security Council.

The Trump administration’s claim that its Venezuelan operation was merely for the purpose of arresting Maduro to face charges initially brought in 2020 and augmented in a superseding indictment unsealed on January 3, 2026 must be seen for what it plainly was—a pretense to carry out an unlawful regime change in a foreign nation and to seize its principal natural resource for commercial or strategic advantage.

.

Under the United Nations Charter, a nation may not use force on the sovereign territory of another country without its consent, a valid claim of self-defense, or authorization by the United Nations Security Council.[4] None of those conditions are satisfied here.

https://www.nycbar.org/press-releases/congress-must-act-to-halt-the-presidents-violations-of-u-s-and-international-law-in-venezuela

NB And the query put to Gemini AI:

can a presidential impeachment be based upon violation of international law

  • Popular Post
32 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

You say that there drugs did not go to the USA. Sure. And the water and aircraft laden with cocaine and other materials on a direct course to theUSA that were intercepted were going where?

So you want to claim that those speedboats had the capability of reaching US shores?

  • Popular Post

4 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

as i said Impeachment will get rid of this 'imbecile ' by getting rid of him, and going back to a stable goverment in the states, only then will, america be great again!! America is going backward!!


How do you figure that, impeachment is not removal from office. Not at all

45 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

So you want to claim that those speedboats had the capability of reaching US shores?

You are looking only at drug boats.The charges against Maduro relate to his international drug trafficking activity. The claim and description is laid out in the indictment. Perhaps you should read it, to better understand why the man was arrested.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1422326/dl

30 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:


How do you figure that, impeachment is not removal from office. Not at all

rubbish !! quote “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

do not alter original post its against forum rule 28

2 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

rubbish !! quote “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

do not alter original post its against forum rule 28


Must be a bug, I didn't alter anything.

Don't be dishonest in your attempt to defend your lie. You should have quoted all of it.
Yes, I know you didn't use what I've quoted for you


AI Overview

No,

impeachment does not automatically mean removal from office; it's the formal act of the House of Representatives bringing charges, like an indictment, while a separate Senate trial determines conviction and removal, which requires a two-thirds vote. An official can be impeached by the House but acquitted (not removed) by the Senate, as happened to Presidents Johnson and Clinton, with no U.S. President ever being removed through this process. 

Key Distinction: Impeachment vs. Removal

  • Impeachment (House Action): The House of Representatives investigates and votes on "Articles of Impeachment" (charges) for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". A simple majority vote in the House impeaches the official.

  • Removal (Senate Action): After impeachment, the Senate holds a trial. A two-thirds vote of Senators present is needed for conviction and removal from office. 

In Summary

  1. House: Impeaches (brings charges).

  2. Senate: Tries the case and votes on conviction/removal.

  3. Outcome: An official is only removed if convicted by the Senate. 

Therefore, impeachment is the first step, not the final removal, and removal itself requires a supermajority vote in the Senate after a trial, notes Wikipedia and the BBC. 

7 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:


Must be a bug, I didn't alter anything.

Don't be dishonest in you attempt to defend your lie.


AI Overview

No,

impeachment does not automatically mean removal from office; it's the formal act of the House of Representatives bringing charges, like an indictment, while a separate Senate trial determines conviction and removal, which requires a two-thirds vote. An official can be impeached by the House but acquitted (not removed) by the Senate, as happened to Presidents Johnson and Clinton, with no U.S. President ever being removed through this process. 

Key Distinction: Impeachment vs. Removal

  • Impeachment (House Action): The House of Representatives investigates and votes on "Articles of Impeachment" (charges) for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". A simple majority vote in the House impeaches the official.

  • Removal (Senate Action): After impeachment, the Senate holds a trial. A two-thirds vote of Senators present is needed for conviction and removal from office. 

In Summary

  1. House: Impeaches (brings charges).

  2. Senate: Tries the case and votes on conviction/removal.

  3. Outcome: An official is only removed if convicted by the Senate. 

Therefore, impeachment is the first step, not the final removal, and removal itself requires a supermajority vote in the Senate after a trial, notes Wikipedia and the BBC. 

need to read further, the Constitution gives Congress the authority to impeach and remove "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States" upon a determination that such officers have engaged in treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.